Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Perempuan: Realitas dan Hukum: Realitas dan Hukum Siregar, Elizabeth; Rakhmawaty, Dessy; Siregar, Zulham Adamy
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2020): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v14i1.1778

Abstract

Violence against women is a crime that almost occurs in all cultures and countries that occur both in public and private spaces. Based on Komnas Perempuan's annual records, almost all regions of Indonesia committed these crimes. The most common violence is sexual violence. In Jambi, during the period of 2017-2019 there were several cases of rape and sexual abuse and other violence. And what's interesting is that some cases have other dimensions of action that are actually important to study how the application of the law to the event. This research is empirical, because it examines facts or legal events by then examining how the application of the law. From the results of the study showed that, the type of sexual violence decided by the judge, generally related to the crime of rape and molestation as contained in the Criminal Code. In the imposition of sanctions, none of the judges has given the maximum sentence, even though the trial proved guilty. In the case of the application of the law, law enforcers in this case prosecutors and judges guide the Criminal Code, which indeed includes rape and molestation arrangements. Although in reality the actual cases have different dimensions of action (more than one) and deserve to be given threats that are in accordance with the perpetrators' actions. In this case, there is a legal vacuum that actually results in uncertainty in fulfilling a sense of justice for women (victims). So it is important to reform the provisions regarding sexual violence by adopting the value of protecting women and accommodating the wisdom principle of the Indonesian nation namely Pancasila and accommodating the principles of gender justice
Village Financial Management in Lumban Pea Village, Toba Regency Elisabeth, Duma Megaria; Saragih, Rintan; Nadapdap, Kristanty M.N.; Napitupulu, Junika; Purba, Dimita H.P.; Rumapea, Melanthon; Simanjuntak, Wesly A.; Silitonga, Ivo Maelina; Simanjuntak, Gracesiela Y.; Marbun, Sondang; Sipayung, Saur Melianna; Pratama, Putra; Tambunan, Jesica; Siregar, Elizabeth; Mesakh, Januardi
Indonesian Journal of Advanced Social Works Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/darma.v2i6.7738

Abstract

This Community Service Activity aims to describe the extent of the changes in Permendagri Number 20 of 2018, Concerning Village Financial Management Guidelines, and is a revision of Permendagri 113 of 2014. Concerning Village Management Guidelines, and its relationship to Law Number 6 of 2014. 2014, About Villages. The source of data obtained is secondary data, by obtaining data from various literature on Village Laws, Government Regulations and Minister of Home Affairs regulations related to Village Financial and Wealth Management. The results of the description written are that Law 6 of 2014 concerning Villages is a reference for the creation and stipulation of Permendagri 113 of 2014 and revised to become Permendagri 20 of 2018 concerning Village Management Guidelines. The conclusion is that there are no very significant changes regarding the substance, Permendagri 113 of 2014, explaining the articles of the Village Law, and improvements are confirmed by Permendagri 20 of 2018, Concerning Village Financial Management Guidelines, which are strictly in accordance with the main duties and functions from the official who is responsible for managing village finances and assets.
Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak: Reformulasi Batasan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berat Simanjuntak, Goklas Christian; Siregar, Elizabeth; Monita, Yulia
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i3.48521

Abstract

The increasing frequency of crimes committed by children not only threatens public order, but will also have the potential to threaten the future of the nation if there is no preparedness in dealing with crimes committed by children. The research method used is normative juridical research with legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that the regulation of criminal sanctions against children who commit serious crimes can only be imposed with a maximum criminal sanction of 10 (ten) years in accordance with the provisions of the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The application of unstrict criminal sanctions to children who are the perpetrators of serious crimes causes the sense of justice for the victim to not be fulfilled and will open up the potential for other children to commit the same or more serious criminal acts in the future. Thus, it is necessary to implement a criminal law policy against Article 81 of the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System which is no longer relevant to the development of types of criminal acts committed by children, especially if the child commits a serious criminal act that has a social impact on society. ABSTRAK Semakin seringnya kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh anak tidak hanya mengancam ketertiban umum, tetapi juga akan berpotensi mengancam masa depan bangsa jika belum adanya kesiapan dalam menghadapi perbuatan kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normative dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, serta perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan sanksi pidana terhadap anak yang melakukan tindak pidana berat hanya bisa dijatuhkan sanksi pidana maksimum 10 (sepuluh) tahun sesuai dengan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Penerapan sanksi pidana yang tidak tegas kepada anak yang menjadi pelaku tindak pidana berat menyebabkan tidak terpenuhinya rasa keadilan bagi korban dan akan membuka potensi bagi anak-anak lain untuk melakukan tindak pidana yang sama atau lebih serius di kemudian hari. Dengan demikian, perlu dilaksanakannya kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap Pasal 81 Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yang sudah tidak relevan dengan berkembangnya jenis-jenis perbuatan tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak, terlebih lagi jika anak melakukan tindak pidana berat yang menimbulkan dampak sosial di masyarakat.
Perlindungan Hak Asasi Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Sitorus, Boris Marisi; Hafrida; Siregar, Elizabeth
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v15i1.4526

Abstract

This study examines the protection of human rights afforded to defendants in traffic crime cases throughout the stages of the Indonesian criminal justice process. The analysis focuses on the fulfillment of fundamental rights as regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Traffic Law, Supreme Court Regulation No. 12 of 2016, and the principles of fair trial. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that although the normative framework provides guarantees for defendants’ rights, implementation remains suboptimal, particularly regarding the right to legal assistance, the principle of equality of arms, procedural fairness, and proportionality in detention and evidentiary procedures. The study highlights the need for regulatory harmonization, stronger oversight mechanisms, and improved professionalism among law enforcement authorities to ensure effective protection of defendants’ rights in traffic crime cases.
Pertanggungjawaban hukum Anak Usia di Bawah 14 Tahun dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia Rizki, Khana Amalia; Hafrida, Hafrida; Siregar, Elizabeth
Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47200/awtjhpsa.v5i2.3428

Abstract

The regulation of accountability and sanctions for children aged 12–14 years in the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia raises normative issues, particularly regarding the unclear position of children as subjects of legal accountability who cannot be punished as stipulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This study aims to analyze the regulation of sanctions against children aged 12–14 years and formulate a direction for fair child accountability regulations. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach. The results of the study indicate that there is ambiguity in the norms of the SPPA Law, which requires reformulation through a tiered accountability model and harmonization with the National Criminal Code to ensure child protection, legal certainty, and proportional justice.
Pengaturan Pemusnahan Barang Bukti Digital Berupa Akun Elektronik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Purnomo, Yogi; L., Sahuri; Siregar, Elizabeth
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v15i1.4536

Abstract

The development of information technology has introduced a new form of evidence in criminal proceedings, namely electronic accounts that serve as instruments, means, or proceeds of crime. However, Indonesia’s criminal justice system still lacks clear and comprehensive legal provisions regarding the destruction of electronic accounts as digital evidence. Existing regulations in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019, and other technical provisions have not explicitly defined the concept, authority, or procedure for such destruction. This regulatory gap creates legal uncertainty, inconsistent practices among law enforcement agencies, and potential violations of privacy rights. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to analyze the adequacy and coherence of current regulations. The findings highlight the need for a reformulation of criminal law policy to establish a prudent, procedurally just, and forensically accountable mechanism for destroying electronic accounts while ensuring data protection and safeguarding citizens’ privacy rights in the digital era.