Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Analysis of the System Thinking Ability of Junior High School Students on the Main Material of the Digestive System Aras, Julio; Jalmo, Tri; Meriza, Nadya
Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah Vol 11, No 3 (2023): Jurnal Bioterdidik
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to describe students' systems thinking abilities on the main material of the Digestive System. The subjects of this research were 60 students of Junior High School 8 Bandar Lampung for the 2022/2023 academic year who were selected from a population of 275 students using a cluster sampling technique. This research uses an ex post facto design. System thinking ability data was obtained through description tests which were analyzed descriptively. The results of the research show that students' systems thinking abilities are in the sufficient category for 60% of students and in the deficient category for 40% of students. The highest systems thinking ability is in the indicator of the ability to examine the character of elements with an average value of 34.25 in the sufficient category, while the lowest systems thinking ability is in the indicator of correlating interconnections with an average value of 16.11 in the deficient category. Based on the results of data calculations, it can be concluded that in general students' systems thinking abilities are in the sufficient category.Keywords: system thinking ability, digestive system
Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subject Using Liveworksheet Argumentative Through Discovery Learning Hasnunidah, Neni; Amanda, Dhea Olivia; Meriza, Nadya; Lengkana, Dewi; Dewi, Pramita Sylvia
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subject Using Liveworksheet Argumentative Through Discovery Learning. Objective: This research aims to analyze students HOTS on the Classification of Living Creatures material using Liveworksheet argumentative worksheets through the Discovery Learning model at SMP Negeri 1 Natar. Methods: This research is a quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The research subjects were 69 class VII students sampled from a population of 384 people using simple random sampling techniques. Cognitive tests (C4, C5, & C6) were analyzed using the Independent sample t-test. Data on student responses were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed descriptively. Findings: The results of the research show that there is a significant difference in the N-gain value (P<0.05) between learning using the Discovery Learning model and discovery-model based argumentative liveworksheet. The high scores in the experimental class were the evaluate skills (N-gain 0.63) and analyze skills (N-gain 0.62), while in the control class the three HOTS indicators were low. Based on the results of the student response questionnaire, it was found that almost all students (82.25%) gave very positive responses to the use of argumentative lifeworksheets. Conclusion: The liveworksheet effectively improve students' HOTS.        Keywords: HOTS, classification of living things, liveworksheet argumentative worksheet, discovery learning model.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp351-372
WORKSHOP KAJIAN PENTINGNYA KEBERADAAN HERITAGE UNTUK MENUMBUHKAN KEPEDULIAN PENDIDIKAN BAGI GURU BIOLOGI KABUPATEN TANGGAMUS Meriza, Nadya; Surbakti, Arwin; Pramudiyanti; Wisnu Juli Wiono
Nemui Nyimah Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Nemui Nyimah Volume 3 Nomor 1
Publisher : FT Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The results of the study on biodiversity of students in class X high school in a heritage site contained some biodiversity material that had not maximized the results regarding the content of heritage as determined by UNESCO, namely the Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (TNBBS) in the Tanggamus district. The results of this study have not been linked to learning in schools, especially in schools located around heritage. The MGMP in biology accommodates learning problems including real-world problems in the surrounding environment. Biology MGMP activities in Tanggamus Regency are still not touched by the issue of heritage biodiversity in the learning process. other than that it has not been seen working with the Ministry of Forestry. The Ministry of Forestry is a very important partner regarding biodiversity material, which this material must be studied according to the demands of the school curriculum. The MGMP workshop in the field of biology partnered with the Ministry of Forestry and the University of Lampung Research Team to produce products in the form of Learning Implementation Plans, LKPD, and learning media. The product contains topics related to biodiversity which were developed through FGDs in Tanggamus Regency at heritage sites. It is hoped that this activity will enable teachers to convey reliable biodiversity knowledge to change students' paradigms regarding the importance of developing world heritage conservation.
Pengaruh Model Argument-Driven Inquiry Terintegrasi STEM terhadap Pengembangan Argumentasi Ilmiah di Sekolah Menengah Indonesia Hasnunidah, Neni; Meriza, Nadya; Fadhila, Sherly; Rosidin, Undang
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 10 (2025): October
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12912

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of integrating Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education to improve high school students' argumentation skills on the topic of the human respiratory system. This study was conducted at MTs Negeri 2 North Lampung, using a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent group design. The population consisted of 166 students spread across five different classes. From this population, samples were taken, namely students in class VIII 1 as the experimental group and students in class VIII 3 as the control group, through a cluster random sampling technique. The research instrument was a 10-question essay test that had been validated to assess students' argumentation skills. The N-Gain data of the argumentation skills of both classes were shown to be normally distributed. Based on the homogeneity of the data obtained, both had homogeneous variances. Data were analyzed using an Independent Samples t-test and effect size calculation. The results showed that the experimental class achieved a significantly higher increase in argumentation skills compared to the control class (0.46 vs. 0.29, p < 0.05). The large effect size (1.26) confirmed the model's substantial impact. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive (82.50%). Based on the evidence, it can be concluded that the ADI-STEM learning model effectively improves students' argumentation skills and fosters 21st-century skills by aligning scientific practices with interdisciplinary learning.