Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Community Legal Education for Post-Covid-19: Economic Recovery and Crime Prevention Awareness (Case of Mokoau, Kendari Indonesia) Herman, Herman; Dewa, Muhammad Jufri; Tatawu, Guasman; Rizky, Ali; Sulihin, La Ode Muhamad; Fikri, Hamdan
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v6i1.61370

Abstract

Crime prevention is an effort to provide protection to the community and realize the welfare of the community. The phenomenon that occurs in the people of Kendari City is not only the high number of street crimes, but also the potential for conflict in society. The high level of crime will greatly affect economic recovery efforts, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic. This community service aims to increase people's knowledge and understanding of the importance of preventing and overcoming crimes that occur in society. This service is carried out in two stages. First, identify legal problems that occur in the community, namely in Mokoau Village. As a result, the crime of theft and the behavior of consuming alcohol are crimes that often occur. Second, direct socialization to the community and conduct legal counseling related to crime prevention policies. At this stage, the public is given an understanding of the modus operandi of theft crime, strategies to prevent theft crime and the impact of alcohol consumption behavior in particular and the impact of crime in society in general. The results of this service show an increase in public knowledge and awareness of responsibility in preventing and overcoming crime. Residents who have very high understanding increased from 13% to 65%. Meanwhile, residents' low understanding of obligations and responsibilities in crime prevention and overcoming decreased from 47% to 13%. That all communities have the same roles and responsibilities in realizing peace and comfort in the community environment.
Carry Over Mechanism As An Efficient Legislative Instrument For Strategic Bills Guasman Tatawu; Fareed Mohd Hassan; Wahyu Aliansa; Muhammad Awaluddin Rasake
APHTN-HAN Vol 5 No 1 (2026): JAPHTN-HAN, January 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55292/japhtnhan.v5i1.206

Abstract

This study explores the carryover mechanism in the legislative process of the Indonesian House of Representatives. It discusses the carryover mechanism in the legislative process in the Indonesian House of Representatives as an instrument of efficiency that allows a bill to be discussed across different periods without starting over from the beginning. This mechanism is assessed as capable of overcoming legislative stagnation, which is a consequence of changing members of the DPR, as seen in the successful passage of the Criminal Code Bill and the TPKS Bill, both approved after experiencing the carryover mechanism. Carryover is present as an innovation in law aimed at solving classic legislative problems, such as many priority bills failing to be approved within one period due to limitations of time, political dynamics, and the complexity of discussions. From the perspective of efficiency, carryover can prevent waste of resources and strengthen the principle of value for money in public administration, while also ensuring legislative continuity across periods, as evidenced by the ratification of the Criminal Code Bill and the TPKS Bill. However, from the legitimacy perspective, this mechanism raises constitutional concerns because it can cause a legitimacy deficit when new members of the DPR continue discussions without proper validation, repetition, or public participation. An analysis using constitutional law shows that carryover can be viewed as legitimate if it is balanced with procedures that guarantee principles of political representation, transparency, and accountability. Meanwhile, a review through progressive legal theory confirms that law must adapt to societal needs and substantive justice, so carryover can only be effective if managed transparently, participatorily, and responsibly.
Court Constitution Delete Nomination Threshold President and Vice President Guasman Tatawu; Wahyu Aliansa
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.50601

Abstract

Thresholds in elections are often considered an obstacle for parties with small political bases to submit candidates for state leaders. Research this aim for the study base, focusing on the law used by the Constitutional Court in the provision of the nomination threshold, as well as its impact on the principles of democracy and representation politics in Indonesia, as outlined in Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024. With a normative study, which focuses on the approach to legislation, concepts, and case studies, the research is conducted. This identifies the reasons behind the law's decisions. The results of the survey indicate that tests of the norms in Article 222 of the Election Law, related to the engineering constitution, may lead to weakening the principles of democracy and a decline in public trust in the government. Therefore, it is necessary to prioritize the interests of the people in the legislative and policy process. Additionally, the decision to introduce this potential change in national politics will enable smaller parties to nominate a State leader. However, there is nothing. This threshold also opens up the possibility for an oligarchy to establish a party for personal gain, which ultimately can weaken the mechanism of checks and balances within the state administration system.