Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Validitas dan Realibilitas Instrumen Teori Pilihan Karir Holland di Indonesia Anggraini, Weni; Kurniawan, Fandy; Susilawati, Susilawati; Hasna, Afra
Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy
Publisher : Kuras Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51214/bocp.v2i2.34

Abstract

Validity and reliability are the main topics in every research instruments. It is important how to create research instrument that is connected to the construct being measured. In this article, the authors tested the validity and reliability of Holland's career instrument Indonesian version. The participants involved are in the period of career preparation and choice, within an educational institution or a job, but has not yet had satisfaction with their career. The participants' age range from 15 to 27 years. The validity test is carried out using the conventional validity type, where the item is declared valid if the correlation coefficient is ≥ 0.3. The results showed 43 items were declared valid and 5 items were declared invalid while the reliability coefficient found is 0.906. Based on the results, Holland's career instrument Indonesian version in a good instrument to measure career preparation and career choice.
APLIKASI STRATEGI PROBLEM SOLVING GURU BK DALAM IMPLEMENTASI MERDEKA BELAJAR Hananto, Ipung; Anggraini, Weni; Moh. Irma Ari Irawan, Tb.
Indonesian Journal of Education and Learning Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Oktober 2023
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31002/ijel.v7i1.954

Abstract

Perubahan era revolusi industri 4.0 terlihat signifikan di semua lini kehidupan. Hal ini memiliki tantangan sekaligus peluang. Dalam dunia pendidikan, kita dituntut untuk mampu dalam menyeimbangkan antara sistem pendidikan dengan perkembangan zaman. Di samping itu, tidak sedikit pula peserta didik yang mengalami berbagai kesulitan dalam mencapai hasil belajar. Hal ini diperlukan upaya untuk menyikapi kondisi tersebut melalui pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling (BK). Strategi problem solving dapat digunakan oleh Guru BK untuk membimbing peserta didik pada proses berpikir kritis, analitis, dan reflektif, pada pemecahan masalah yang efektif serta mampu mengambil keputusan secara tepat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui aplikasi strategi problem solving dalam implementasi merdeka belajar. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kualitatif analisis deskriptif yang menggunakan metode studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil yang didapat dari penelitian ini yaitu beberapa hal yang sudah diaplikasikan dalam strategi teknik problem solving yaitu membuat kelompok-kelompok belajar, dengan melakukan bimbingan kelompok antar peserta didik, berupaya membantu memberikan solusi permasalahan yang dialami peserta didik, serta ditunjang dengan dilakukan layanan konseling untuk mendukung strategi problem solving supaya terlaksana dengan baik. Rekomendasi pada penelitian ini adalah strategi problem solving, dapat dikembangkan dengan tahapan melakukan identifikasi masalah, melakukan perumusan masalah, menentukan alternatif pemecahan masalah, melakukan identifikasi konsekuensi dari pengambilan keputusan setiap alternatif, memilih alternatif yang efektif, dan melakukan pengujian dari pengambilan keputusan.
Differences in academic achievement and psychological well-being based on major selection status Anggraini, Weni; Suwidagdho, Dhanang; Sari, Arlina; Kurniawan, Fandy; Hananto, Ipung
Counsenesia Indonesian Journal Of Guidance and Counseling Vol 7 No 1 (2026): COUNSENESIA 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Universitas Tunas Pembangunan Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36728/cijgc.v7i1.6689

Abstract

Choosing a college major is one of the most important decisions in a student's educational journey. In reality, however, many Indonesian students enter their study programs not based on personal interest, but due to exam-score requirements, family expectations, or limited options. A mismatch between interests and major is related to students' psychological well-being. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in psychological well-being (PWB) and academic achievement (GPA) between Biology students who chose their major based on interest and those who did not, in terms of psychological well-being (PWB) and academic achievement (GPA). Using a quantitative comparative design, data were collected from 90 Biology students. PWB was measured with Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being, and GPA was obtained from official university records. After confirming normality and homogeneity of variance, an independent samples t-test was applied for PWB and a Mann-Whitney U test for GPA. The independent samples t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, t(88) = 4.361, p < .001. And the Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference in GPA between the two groups, U = 1003, z = ?0.077, p >.001. These findings indicate that major selection driven by personal interest is meaningfully linked to students' psychological well-being, though not to their academic grades. The implications for academic guidance and counseling practice are discussed.