Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.879
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL EKOLOGI BIROKRASI JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo) ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Sosial Humaniora SANGKEP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan PREPOTIF : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Academia Open CENDERAWASIH: Jurnal Antropologi Papua J-Abdimas Cenderawasih
Kadir, Akhmad
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Validated Culturally Responsive Science Assessment Using Integrated Content and Construct Analysis Ali, Aisyah; Bektiarso, Singgih; Walukow, Auldry Fransje; Narulita, Erlia; Kadir, Akhmad
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12776

Abstract

(General Background) The alignment of science assessment with students’ socio-cultural contexts is essential to ensure fairness and meaningful measurement of learning outcomes. (Specific Background) However, most contextualized assessments in science education emphasize content validity without empirically confirming their construct structure, limiting their interpretive strength. (Knowledge Gap) There remains a lack of studies that integrate content, empirical, and construct validity evidence in culturally responsive instruments, particularly those designed in parallel pre–post forms. (Aims) This study aimed to develop and validate an ethnoscience-based pre–post instrument by linking Aiken’s Content Validity Ratio (CVR, 4-point scale) with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA, CR/AVE). (Results) Findings from five expert reviews showed 22 of 40 items exceeded the conservative threshold (Aiken’s V ≥ 0.80; CVR = 1.00). Field trials (N = 50) demonstrated moderate difficulty and positive discrimination, while CFA confirmed a three-factor structure with good fit (χ² = 34.203, df = 24, p = 0.083; CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.065). Composite reliability ranged from 0.718–0.797, and AVE was adequate for two factors (0.506; 0.568) and marginal for one (0.459). (Novelty) The study presents a transparent “content–empirical–construct” decision trail rarely reported in ethnoscience assessment. (Implications) This integrative validation framework demonstrates that cultural responsiveness and psychometric rigor can coexist, guiding fair and contextual science learning evaluations. Highlights: Integrates Aiken–CVR and CFA for comprehensive validity evidence. Confirms three-factor model with strong reliability and moderate AVE. Demonstrates synergy between cultural relevance and measurement rigor. Keywords: Content Validity, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Ethnoscience, Culturally Responsive Assessment, Psychometric Validation
Co-Authors AKBAR SILO Ali, Aisyah Bahamary, Aryanti R. Erlia Narulita Fredrik Sokoy Ilham Ilham Iribaram, Suparto Lekitoo, Hanro Y. Lutfianasari, Rahma Muhamad Yusuf, SE., M.Si. Muhandy, Rachmad Surya Nawir, M. Syukri Patmasari, Eka Pawennari Hijjang Poli, Agustina Ivonne Saru, Rustan Singgih Bektiarso Sumardi, Joseph Sumawan Sunio, Safira Stepan Tokang, Maspawati Usman Idris Walukow, Auldry Fransje