Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.784
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Dakwah: Jurnal Kajian Dakwah dan Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Media Hukum
Nazah, Farida Nurun
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Esa Unggul
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ESENSI SUMPAH DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERSPEKTIF FILOSOFIS Nazah, Farida Nurun; Astutik, Eka Ayu Astri
Lex Jurnalica Vol 21, No 3 (2024): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v21i3.8721

Abstract

This research probes the essence of oaths in trials from a philosophical perspective, utilizing a normative juridical approach. The Oath by the witness in process during trials is a crucial element that cannot be omitted from the Indonesian legal system. The administration of oaths, according to individuals' respective religions and beliefs, embodies moral and ethical values as articulated by Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. Aristotle emphasized the oath as the foundation of trust in law enforcement, while Kant viewed the oath as a moral act demonstrating a commitment to truth. Legally, the oath is governed by the Civil Code and the Criminal Code. Oaths in trials are categorized into oaths as evidence and oaths for giving testimony, with the testimony itself serving as evidence. In practice, oaths function to enhance the veracity of testimony and exert psychological pressure on witnesses to ensure honesty. Breaching an oath can lead to legal repercussions, including sanctions under the perjury provisions of the Criminal Code. The findings of this research indicate that oaths administered during trials in court-room, is not only as legally binding evidence but also impose a moral obligation on individuals to uphold the truth. The study concludes that ethical values are of paramount importance in the administration of justice to ensure the attainment of genuine justice; meaning that the legal process is fair (procedural justice) and the outcomes are just and equitable (substantive justice).Keywords: Oath, Trial, Philosophical
Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum atas Pelanggaran Izin dalam Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Nazah, Farida Nurun; Renanta, Yunesia Amelia; Ramadan, Aesa Rizki; Arkananta, Rakha Purwa; Anggraini, Naswa Fiolla; Agustina, Winda; Wijaya, Friska Nova; Sahputra, Dedi; Salsabil, Aida Hanan Putri
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i5.12227

Abstract

Environmental licensing violations have become a significant factor accelerating ecosystem degradation in Indonesia. Licensing instruments, which are supposed to function as preventive and controlling tools, are often neglected by both business actors and local governments. This research aims to analyze law enforcement against environmental licensing violations based on Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, while also examining its effectiveness, challenges, and potential improvements. This study employs a normative juridical research type with a statutory and case study approach. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature review and documentation. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by interpreting applicable legal norms and comparing them with law enforcement practices in the field. Data validity was ensured through source triangulation, combining statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and empirical findings from relevant case studies. The findings reveal that licensing violations generally include neglect of Environmental Impact Assessment (Amdal), environmental permits, and business activities conducted without UKL-UPL documents. Law enforcement measures cover administrative, criminal, and civil instruments, yet their implementation remains ineffective due to weak supervision, the lack of deterrent sanctions, and conflicts of interest among stakeholders. This study concludes that law enforcement on licensing violations has not been optimal and requires strengthening in regulatory frameworks, institutional capacity, and public participation. Strengthening inter-agency coordination, enforcing strict sanctions without discrimination, and encouraging community involvement are deemed essential to enhance compliance and improve environmental governance in Indonesia.
Status Hukum Hak Kepemilikan Atas Tanah oleh WNA Akibat Perjanjian Nominee Dengan WNI (Studi Putusan Nomor 144/Pdt/2021/Pt.Dps): Legal Status of Land Ownership Rights by Foreign Nationals as a Result of Nominee Agreements with Indonesian Citizens (Study of Decision Number 144/Pdt/2021/Pt.Dps) Agustina, Ajeng Ana; Nazah, Farida Nurun
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Media Hukum (JMH)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tompotika Luwuk Banggai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59414/jmh.v13i2.1023

Abstract

Penggunaan nama pinjaman oleh warga negara asing (WNA) untuk memperoleh kepemilikan tanah di Indonesia dikenal sebagai praktik nominee agreement. Praktik ini kerap dianggap sebagai strategi untuk menghindari pembatasan hukum yang melarang WNA memiliki tanah dengan status hak milik. Keabsahan hukum dari perjanjian semacam ini menimbulkan perdebatan, terlebih dalam kaitannya dengan kasus hukum No: 144/PDT/2021/PT DPS yang turut ditelaah pada penelitian ini, termasuk konsekuensi dari kepemilikan tanah oleh WNA akibat perjanjian yang tidak sah. Penelitian ini memakai pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan menelaah kasus konkret serta ketentuan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Untuk menganalisis permasalahan, digunakan teori perjanjian dan teori kepastian hukum. Temuan dalam studi ini mengindikasikan bahwa perjanjian nominee tergolong sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hukum, karena bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UU No. 5 Tahun 1960) yang secara tegas membatasi hak milik tanah hanya bagi WNI. Selain itu, perjanjian semacam ini mengandung unsur penyimpangan tujuan yang menunjukkan adanya niat tidak baik dari para pihak. Akibat hukum dari praktik tersebut adalah pembatalan hak atas tanah yang diperoleh secara tidak sah, dan pengembalian status tanah tersebut kepada negara. Dengan demikian, perjanjian nominee dinyatakan tidak sah karena tidak memenuhi unsur sahnya perjanjian, khususnya terkait dengan tujuan yang dibenarkan oleh hukum.
Co-Authors Achmad Edi Subiyanto Ade Hari Siswanto Agustina, Ajeng Ana Ahmad, Dwi Nur Fauziah Akbar, Sachrial Alfiana, Rita Anatomi Muliawan Anggraini, Naswa Fiolla Anna Triningsih, Anna Aristi, Farra Amalia Arkananta, Rakha Purwa Astutik, Eka Ayu Astri Azis, Riska Amelia Bertha, Anna Citra, Lana Fadila Daryono, Guntur Dwi Nur Fauziah Ahmad Ernawati Ernawati Feriza, Gousta Fitria Olivia Henry Arianto Hikmawati, Elok Horadin Saragih Husnia Husnia I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan Ika Sartika Lelono, Gatot Menwih, Menwih Muslimin Muslimin Nilasari, Nur Apisha Nurhayani nurhayani Puspita, Ari Isnaeni Rahmadani, Adhining Prabawati Ramadan, Aesa Rizki Renanta, Yunesia Amelia Rizqi, Radithya Cahya Safitri, Apriyani Eka Sahputra, Dedi Saiful Bahri Salsabil, Aida Hanan Putri Sri Redjeki Slamet Suprajogi, Agus Taher, Irmanjaya Wardhani, Sri Pramudya Wasis Susetio Widiatno, Men Wih Wijaya, Friska Nova Winda Agustina Zulfikar Judge