Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Spektrum Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Rechtsidee Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Kosmik Hukum Al-Syakhsiyyah : Journal of Law and Family Studies JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Suara Hukum Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Batulis Civil Law Review PATTIMURA Legal Journal Jurnal Legisia RechtIdee SASI Journal of Law and Legal Reform Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)
Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)

 1 
PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN BERMARTABAT DALAM PARADOKS ETIKA DAN HUKUM Disantara, Fradhana Putra
LITIGASI Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4211

Abstract

The law and ethics have a relationship between the two. However, there are often conflicts between law and ethics. This phenomenon is as happened in the case of cancellation by the State Administrative Court (PTUN) of the Presidential Decree as a follow-up to the ethical decision that is final and binding from the Election Organizing Honorary Council (DKPP). This study uses a statutory and conceptual approach by using primary and secondary legal materials. The two legal materials are inventoried to obtain a prescriptive legal analysis and provide a holistic conceptual study of the legal issues discussed. This legal research aims to analyze the position of ethics in legal instruments in Indonesia concerning infrastructure and ethical decisions and to investigate the enigma between law and ethics in one case in the perspective of a dignified justice theory. The study results show that the DKPP decision's position is equivalent to a legal court decision. On the other hand, the role of ethics in legal instruments in Indonesia is equal; and is based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the perspective of the theory of dignified justice, the cancellation of the Presidential Decree as a follow-up to the ethical judgment of the DKPP has ‘abused’ the three legal functions. Thus, it is necessary to distinguish between Presidential Decrees, which are products of administrative law and the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the decision of the DKPP ethical court. Keywords: Law and Ethics, Dignified Justice, DKPP, Ethics Court.
EKSTENTIFIKASI KEWENANGAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMPERKUAT GAGASAN CONSTITUTIONAL ETHICS Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Putri, Febri Falisa; Mufarrochah, Sylvia; Assari, Elsa
LITIGASI Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7232

Abstract

This research has an urgency to construct the extension of MKMK's authority to be required to provide information in its capacity as an examiner of code of ethics violations committed by MK judges to law enforcement officials if MK judges become suspects or defendants of a crime. This research is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The urgency of idea  constitutional ethics in maintaining the code of ethics of MK judges  which can actually be optimized with  formation of MKMK based on MK Regulation No. 1 of 2023. The extension of MKMK's authority as the implementation of  idea of constitutional ethics in optimizing efforts to safeguard the code of ethics of MK judges can actually be carried out by revising Article 3 of MK Regulation No. 1 of 2023 to extend or expand the authority of MKMK in providing information if MK judges are caught in a crime, in particular giving considerations from an ethical perspective is actually aimed at strengthening  relationship between ethical norms and legal norms. Also that the phenomenon in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 103/PUU-XX/2022 will not be repeated in the future. Keywords: Constitutional Ethics, Authority, Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Abdunayimova, Dinara Assari, Elsa Bayu Dwi Anggono Budiana, I Nyoman Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip Disantara, Geraldha Islami Putra Dwi Edi Wibowo Efendi, Aan ENY SULISTYOWATI Firmansyah, Jaka Geraldha Islami Putra Disantara HANANTO WIDODO I Gede Agus Kurniawan Irmayanti, Dwi Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Kadir, M. Yakub Aiyub Masnun, Muh. Ali Mau Lulo, Lourenco de Deus Miftah Arifin Muchamad Taufiq Mufarrochah, Sylvia Naftali, Septina Andriani neny, Neny rahmawati Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Niken Larasati Nurhidayat, Tri Nutako, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Prasetio, Dicky Eko Putra, R. Yuri Andina Putri, Febri Falisa Putu Aras Samsithawrati Radityo, Eka Rahmawati, Galih Sulaksono, Sulaksono Suyitno, Didik Thuong , Mac Thi Hoai Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai Valentino, Widhi Wildani, Sahril