Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.937
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam J-MKLI (Jurnal Manajemen dan Kearifan Lokal Indonesia) Eksekusi : Journal Of Law JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Hikmatuna International Journal of Islamic Business and Economics (IJIBEC)
Rozikin, Opik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
THE TRADITION OF CAROK IN MADURA ACCORDING TO POSITIVE LAW AND ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW Hidayatulloh, Rizki Bagus; Najmudin, Deden; Rozikin, Opik
EKSEKUSI Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v7i2.38548

Abstract

Carok is a cultural tradition in Madura, involving a fight or duel using a cerulit knife to restore one's pride and honor that has been trampled on by others. This tradition involves abuse and murder, and the perpetrators are not punished because there is a customary agreement. This is not in accordance with Islamic law and positive law. In Islamic Criminal Law, carok is categorized as a qishash-diyat crime. Meanwhile, according to Indonesian positive law, carok is a criminal act of murder as regulated in Articles 338-340 of the Criminal Code. This study aims to analyze the tradition of carok from the perspective of positive law and Islamic criminal law, including examining the sanctions for perpetrators of carok, the elements and stages of carok, and the customary agreements involved. This study uses a descriptive analysis method with a normative juridical approach. The type of data used in this research is qualitative, using secondary data sources with library research data collection techniques and deductive data analysis techniques. The results of this study show that the tradition of carok violates Positive Law and Islamic Criminal Law. In Islamic Criminal Law, perpetrators are subject to qishash-diyat, and in Positive Law, carok is a criminal act and violates the law. Therefore, carok as a tradition needs to be re-examined. 
Contextualizing Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah in Indigenous Legal Practices: A Comparative Study of Family Resilience in Kasepuhan Ciptagelar and Kampung Naga Rozikin, Opik; Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas; Aden Rosadi; Ine Fauzia; Muharir, Muharir; Ahyani, Hisam; Nurul Ilyana Muhd Adnan
Nurani Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v25i2.27760

Abstract

Strengthening the normative foundation and maqāṣid orientation of Indonesia’s religious court system allows it to render fair judgments for the parties while safeguarding the future of children. While Islamic family law is often studied normatively, limited attention is given to its lived application in plural legal settings. Using a descriptive qualitative approach with socio-legal and phenomenological methods, data were collected through purposive sampling of 20 participants, including traditional leaders, religious figures, and village officials. Field observations and the analysis of local documents, including customary manuscripts, sermons, and marriage records, serve to complement the data. The findings reveal that family resilience emerges from a dynamic interplay between Islamic and customary norms, particularly in areas like inheritance, marriage, and gender roles. Integration of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah occurs through contextual reinterpretation aligned with communal structures and values. Differences between the communities are notable in the role of traditional authority, the interpretation of qiwāmah, and dispute resolution mechanisms. This study contributes to the discourse on Islamic legal pluralism by presenting a contextual model of normative integration. It highlights the potential of a culturally grounded and adaptive Islamic legal framework to strengthen sustainable family systems across diverse local contexts.
Co-Authors Aden Rosadi Ahmad Suganda Ahmad, Md Yazid Awaliyah, Iysatul Hazar Azazy, Yusup bin Hussin, Hanafi Dunur'aeni, M. A. E. Encep Taufik Rahman Ending Solehudin Erma Rusdiana Hidayatulloh, Rizki Bagus Hisam Ahyani Imron Rosyadi Ine Fauzia Irfan Fadil, Muhammad Lousada, Sérgio António Neves Mauluddin, Agus Miftakhul Huda Muharir, Muharir Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Najmudin, Deden Niska Shofia, Niska Nurul Ilyana Muhd Adnan Saebani, Beni Ahmad Sonjaya, Adang Suganda, Ahmad Susilawati, Cucu Syamsul Fatoni