Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.033
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Floratek Saraswati Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA DAN SISTEM INFORMASI PITIN Siyasatuna Jurnal Ilmiyah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syariyyah Al-Fath Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Enggang: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi dan Teknologi Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Buana Pengabdian Profit: Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi Cendekia: Journal of Law, Social and Humanities Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Majority Science Journal ENCOMMUNICATION: Journal of Communication Studies
Sartika Dewi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Kewenangan Hakim dalam Menyatakan Gugatan idak Dapat di Terima Niet Ontvankelije Verklaard dalam Perkara Perdata (Putusan Nomor 82/Pdt.G/2025/Pn Kwg) Edward Japanis Ratu Dewan; Sartika Dewi; Muhamad Abas
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2570

Abstract

This research discusses the authority of judges in declaring a lawsuit inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard/NO) in civil cases based on Decision Number 82/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg. The issues examined in this study relate to the application of formal requirements of a lawsuit and the authority of judges in rendering an NO decision due to errors in determining legal subjects (error in persona). This study aims to analyze the application of civil procedural law regarding the formal requirements of a lawsuit and to examine the authority of judges in declaring a lawsuit inadmissible. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory and case approaches. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the formal requirements of a lawsuit hold a very important position in civil procedural law. Errors in determining legal subjects, particularly involving a party who has passed away without involving the heirs, result in a formally defective lawsuit and cause it to be declared inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard). In Decision Number 82/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg, the judges exercised their authority in accordance with civil procedural law to maintain legal certainty and orderly judicial proceedings. However, the application of such authority is considered to be overly formalistic because it did not provide an opportunity to amend the lawsuit, thereby giving less attention to substantive justice for the plaintiff.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ORANG YANG MEMINJAMKAN DATA PRIBADINYA UNTUK KEPERLUAN PEMBELIAN OBJEK ATAU BARANG TERTENTU Friska Sonya Yolanda; Sartika Dewi; Muhamad Abas
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 2, Juni 2026 Release
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.50257

Abstract

This study was carried out because it is still common for debtors to transfer fiduciary property to third parties without the agreement of creditors, resulting in losses and legal ambiguity for creditors. Fiduciary collateral is really governed by Law No. 42 of 1999, which gives creditors privileged status and legal protection. Examining the legal protection provided to creditors with regard to the transfer of fiduciary collateral and the possible legal remedies in the case of such a violation is the goal of this study. By examining laws, legal literature, and other pertinent legal resources, the research methodology uses normative legal research using a normative juridical perspective. The results show that both preventative and repressive techniques are used to give creditors legal protection. The formation of genuine deeds, the requirement to register fiduciary security, and the ban on moving the subject of security without the creditor's approval are preventive measures that provide protection. Repressively, creditors have access to civil legal remedies, such as claims for tort, violation of contract, and enforcement of fiduciary security, as well as criminal penalties. When a fiduciary collateral item is transferred without authorisation, creditors have a number of legal options at their disposal. These remedies include enforcing the fiduciary collateral object and civil remedies include bringing a tort and breach of contract case. Additionally, creditors may pursue criminal remedies by reporting the debtor to the authorities if the debtor is found to have committed a legal violation. These measures are taken to protect the creditor’s rights and provide legal certainty regarding the agreement that has been entered into.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Kohabitasi Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Ridho Atilla Helman; Sartika Dewi; Muhamad Abas
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i2.2514

Abstract

Cohabitation as a practice of living together between men and women without a legal marriage bond is an important issue in the reform of Indonesia's criminal law. This study aims to analyze the regulation of cohabitation as a complaint offense in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) and its implications for the protection of the moral values of the community and the limits of criminal law intervention on citizens' private spaces. The research method used is normative law with a statutory and conceptual approach, using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed juridically qualitatively. The results of the study show that Article 412 of the Criminal Code only formulates cohabitation as a criminal act with the character of an absolute complaint, which is intended to protect moral, religious, and marital values, while limiting state intervention in private life. However, this norm still raises juridical problems because it does not provide clear limits on the element of "living together as husband and wife outside of marriage", so it has the potential to cause multiple interpretations and legal uncertainty. Therefore, a clearer and proportionate interpretation is needed so that the application of cohabitation norms remains in line with the principles of legal certainty, justice, and the protection of human rights in the context of modern criminal law.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Ade Yusuf Ferudyn Amaliya, Lia Andini Sinaga Andre Annisa Wati Arafat, Zarisnov Asyhadi, Farhan Athilya Putri Christian J Siallagan Deny Guntara Dicky Indrawan Durratun Nafisah Edward Japanis Ratu Dewan Elly Kesumawati Erita Hayati Fajar Abdul Aziz Farhan Asyhadi Framesti Yustanti Cahya Friska Sonya Yolanda Gilang Wahyudin Hendrika, Yan Hisbullah Ibnu Yustiya Ramadhan Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja Irma Garwan Jihan Farisa Lia Amaliya M. Gary Gagarin Akbar Muhamad Abas Muhammad Sari Mutiara Nia Ramadhana Nirena Ade Christy Nur Fika Herlina Permatasari Diah Rahmayani Rhamadani, Fitrah Ridho Atilla Helman Rozi Thoyyiba Tampi Sandra Sept Stefani Ratu Lestariningtyas Supriatna, Yayat Suryati Suryati Susi yulyana Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Tiara Khalisna Titok Wilyanzah Umi Kaltum Wasnury Rendra Widia Fransiska Yuni Pratiwi Yusuf Rizki Zarisnov Arafat