Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics

Regression Algorithms in Predicting the SARS-CoV-2 Replicase Polyprotein 1ab Inhibitor: A Comparative Study Sengkey, Daniel Febrian; Masengi, Angelina
Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 6 No 1 (2024): January
Publisher : Department of Electromedical Engineering, POLTEKKES KEMENKES SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jeeemi.v6i1.338

Abstract

Due to its extensive steps and trials, drug discovery is a long and expensive process. In the last decade, as also hard pressed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the screening process could be assisted with the advancement in computational technology including the application of Machine Learning. The classification task in Machine Learning has become one of the major approaches for drug discovery. Unfortunately, this practice uses discretized labels that might lead to the loss of quantitative properties that could be meaningful. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to compare various Machine Learning regression algorithms in predicting inhibitory bioactivity, specifically the IC50 value, with the SARS-CoV-2 Replicase Polyprotein 1ab as the target. With 1,138 non-duplicated data downloaded from the ChEMBL database that was engineered into four dataset variances, 42 regression algorithms were utilized for the prediction. We found that there are computational challenges to the use of regression algorithms in predicting bioactivity, for only a handful and a specific dataset variance that returned valid performance parameters upon testing. The three that yielded the highest counts of valid performance parameters are the Histogram Gradient Boosting Regressor (HGBR), Light Gradient Boosting Machine Regressor (LGBR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR). Further statistical analyses show that there is no significant difference between these three algorithms, except for the time taken for training and testing the model, where the LGBR excels. Therefore, these three algorithms should be primarily considered for the study with the same nature.
Comparative Analysis of Hepatitis C virus Genotype 1a (Isolate 1) using Multiple Regression Algorithms and Fingerprinting Techniques Nur Fiat, Daffa; Suratinoyo, Syifabela; Kolang, Indri Claudia; Ticoalu, Injilia Tirza; Purnomo, Nadira Tri Ardianti; Mawara, Reza Michelly Cantika; Sengkey, Daniel; Masengi, Angelina Stevany Regina; Sambul, Alwin Melkie
Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 6 No 4 (2024): October
Publisher : Department of Electromedical Engineering, POLTEKKES KEMENKES SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jeeemi.v6i4.506

Abstract

Approximately 70 million people worldwide have been infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV), presenting a critical global health challenge. As a member of the Flaviviridae family, HCV can cause severe liver diseases such as cirrhosis, acute hepatitis, and chronic hepatitis. The Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome encodes a single polyprotein consisting of 3010 amino acids, which when processed contains 10 polypeptides derived from cellular and viral proteases. These include structural proteins such as core protein, E1 and E2 envelope glycoproteins, and nonstructural proteins such as NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B. Nonstructural proteins will be released by HCV NS2-3 and NS3-4A proteases, however, structural proteins will be released by host ER signaling peptidases. co-translationally and post-translationally form 10 individual structural proteins: 5'-C-E1-E2-p7-NS2-NS3-NS4A-NS4B-NS5A-NS5B-3'. Despite extensive research, there are significant gaps in predictive and analytical approaches to managing HCV, particularly in understanding the polyprotein structure and its implications for drug discovery. This study addresses these gaps by employing machine learning techniques to analyze HCV polyprotein using various fingerprinting methods and regression algorithms. The data was sourced from the ChEMBL database, and fingerprinting techniques such as PubChem, MACCS, and E-State were utilized. Regression algorithms, including Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), AdaBoost Regression (ABR), and Hist Gradient Boosting Regression (HSR), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using R² and Adjusted R² metrics, comparing default models with those enhanced by hyperparameter tuning. Feature importance analysis was conducted to identify key features influencing model performance, aiding in model simplification. The results show that although hyperparameter tuning does not significantly improve the predictive power of a model, it can provide an insight into model optimization. In particular, the default model showed higher R² and Adjusted R² values across different fingerprinting techniques compared to models with hyperparameterized features. Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) consistently performed well, with GBR showing the highest R² values when using PubChem fingerprints. Although there was no significant improvement through hyperparameter tuning, this study was able to find out the features that strongly influenced the model performance by conducting a feature importance analysis. This analysis helped simplify the model and highlighted the potential of machine learning in improving the understanding of HCV polyprotein structure. This research identifies optimal regression models and fingerprinting techniques, providing a strong framework for future drug discovery efforts aimed at improving global health outcomes. The research also shows that it is important to date to advance drug discovery using machine learning.