Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.176
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Al-Iqtishad : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah (Journal of Islamic Economics) Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum El-Mashlahah JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Jurnal HAM J-MPI (Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam) Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Al Huquq : Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues (IJSEI) These proceedings represent the work of researchers participating in The International Conference on Elementary Education (ICEE) which is being hosted by the Elementary Education Study Programme School of Postgraduate Studies, Universitas Pendidikan MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Journal of Islamic Business Law JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian
Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Integrating Good Governance and Digitalisation: A New Breakthrough in the Special Economic Zone of Singhasari Cahyandari, Dewi; Susilo, Edi; Hadiyantina, Shinta; Prasetyo, Ngesti D.; Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian; Liemanto, Airin; Arifien, Zainal; Supriyadi, Rizki Febrianto; Lestari, Diah Charisma
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): October
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2022.12.2.238-268

Abstract

Special Economic Zones (SEZs) aim to boost the economy of a region or even a country. In Indonesia, as of 2022, eighteen regions belonged to SEZs, and Singhasari is among those regions—the only SEZ with a digital economic concept. In its implementation, a Good Governance concept is needed to allow for the organisation of management and the achievement of the goals of the development of the SEZ. Concepts such as Community Participation, Stakeholder Involvement, and Local Ownership will be discussed in this research. On the other hand, technology can be utilised to give value to SEZ. The digitalisation of the SEZ can be used in the implementation of Good Governance concepts as well as attracting people and investors to participate. The concept of digitizing the SEZ Singhasari area utilising Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality can be used to introduce the SEZ of Singhasari. Besides, there are also other features such as legal materials underpinning the development of SEZ Singhasari. This study used the principle of Good Governance that underlies SEZ governance. Meanwhile, the concept of digitalisation with the addition of augmented and virtual reality will be used as one of the breakthroughs to harmonize development in the current technological era. Keywords: Special Economic Zone, Singhasari, Digitalisation, Good Governance.
Productive Waqf Law Reform: A Solution to Support Indonesian Local Economy amid Contemporary Global Recession Miftahul Huda; Aditya Prastian Supriyadi; Ramadhita
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i2.10210

Abstract

Productive waqf potential supports sustainable local economic resilience in the face of a global recession. However, its management in Indonesia remains suboptimal, considering that waqf assets are more dominantly distributed to non-productive sectors. This happens because the legal framework of waqf is not ideal for regulating the management of cash waqf assets productively for the economic empowerment of the community amid a global recession. This study analyses the urgency of legal reform in the cash waqf asset sector to support local economic empowerment while exploring the synergy between Islamic law and positive law in designing a more adaptive basis for productive waqf law to address modern economic challenges. The method employed in this study is normative legal research, incorporating both conceptual and statutory approaches. The data analysis technique was conducted using the content analysis method to explore legal doctrines and related literature to formulate the ideal concept of productive waqf legal reform. The research results show that the urgency of waqf law reform is based on weak regulations that hinder the optimisation of cash waqf assets for economic empowerment. Legal uncertainty, inequality of access to waqf benefits, and regulatory compliance with the needs of the modern economy are the main challenges that require responses. The second area of research on the synergy between Islamic law and positive law can serve as the basis for regulatory renewal through the accommodation of sharia maqashid principles, economic empowerment based on productive waqf, and collaboration among the government, the private sector, and the community. Proper legal reform will encourage more structured and systematic management of cash waqf assets, making it a strategic legal instrument for strengthening local economic resilience amid the threat of a global recession.  
Legal Positivism and Fiqh Muamalah Paradigm’s on Indonesian Sharia Fintech Legal Framework Saifullah, Saifullah; Al Munawar, Faishal Agil; Bahagiati, Kurniasih; Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v16i1.39237

Abstract

Sharia Financial Technology in Indonesia is regulated in OJK Regulation No. 10/POJK.05/2022 Concerning Information Technology-Based Joint Funding Services. According to researchers, enacting these regulations still needs improvement because they are disproportionate to the basic rules for implementing Sharia Fintech in Indonesia. A Fiqh Muamalah study needs to be conducted to reconstruct these rules into proportional rules. This research uses normative legal research methods. This research uses a statutory regulatory approach related to Fintech and DSN MUI Fatwa, as well as the Fiqh Muamalah conceptual approach. The results show that based on the Fiqh Muamalah indicator, OJK Regulation No. 10/POJK.05/2022 still needs to be in harmony with Fiqh Muamalah. The OJK Regulations have no concrete rules regarding what contracts can be used for Sharia Fintech schemes.  Abstrak:Financial Technology Syariah di Indonesia saat ini diatur dalam Peraturan OJK No. 10/POJK.05/2022 Tentang Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Keberlakuan Peraturan tersebut masih perlu di perbaiki karena tidak proporsional sebagai aturan dasar penyelenggaraan. Perlu ada kajian Fikih Muamalah untuk Merekonstruksi aturan tersebut menjadi aturan yang proporsional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan Pendekatan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan Fintech dan Fatwa DSN MUI, serta pendekatan Konseptual Fikih Muamalah. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan, berdasarkan indikator Fikih Muamalah, Peraturan OJK No. 10/POJK.05/2022 masih tidak harmonis dengan Fikih Muamalah. Dalam Peraturan OJK tidak ada aturan konkret mengenai akad apa yang dapat digunakan untuk skema Fintech Syariah.
THE EVALUATION OF THE INDONESIAN FINTECH LAW FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF REGULATORY TECHNOLOGY PARADIGMS TO MITIGATE ILLEGAL FINTECH Saifullah, Saifullah; Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian; Bahagiati, Kurniasih; Al Munawar, Faishal Agil
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 14, No 2 (2023): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v14i2.24025

Abstract

Illegal fintech is one of the main issues not fully addressed in the digital finance sector in Indonesia despite various legal regulations. This condition shows that the fintech legal framework in Indonesia still needs to be entirely relevant to the concept of Regulatory Technology (regtech). This study aims to analyze the position of the fintech legal framework in Indonesia in overcoming illegal fintech with a regtech approach chosen as an analytical instrument—a basic concept that combines law and digital financial technology to create an orderly platform and comply with all applicable laws. This article uses normative-legal research methods and a conceptual approach, indicating that the legal framework governing fintech in Indonesia fragments, with rules spreading across the civil, administrative, and criminal sectors. This legal framework still needs to be reinforced as a legal tool to overcome the problem. Based on the regtech approach, increased transparency and accountability in fintech implementation are essential as legal support for dynamic supervision and law enforcement and to allow for wider access to cooperation between stakeholders in handling illegal fintech. Such measures will help create a more effective legal environment and align with the regtech paradigm in addressing illegal fintech practices in Indonesia. Fintech ilegal merupakan salah satu isu utama yang belum sepenuhnya tertangani di sektor keuangan digital di Indonesia, meskipun telah diterbitkan berbagai peraturan hukum. Kondisi ini menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum fintech di Indonesia memerlukan evaluasi berdasarkan paradigma Regulatory Technology (RegTech). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis posisi kerangka hukum fintech di Indonesia dalam mengatasi permasalahan fintech ilegal dengan pendekatan RegTech. RegTech dipilih sebagai instrumen analisis karena merupakan konsep dasar yang menggabungkan hukum dan teknologi keuangan digital untuk menciptakan platform yang tertib dan mematuhi semua hukum yang berlaku. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum yang mengatur fintech di Indonesia masih terfragmentasi dengan aturan yang tersebar di sektor perdata, administrasi, dan pidana. Kerangka hukum ini masih perlu diperkuat sebagai alat hukum untuk mengatasi masalah fintech ilegal. Berdasarkan pendekatan RegTech, diperlukan peningkatan transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam implementasi fintech, sebagai dukungan hukum atas pengawasan dan penegakan hukum yang dinamis serta dukungan hukum untuk membuka saluran kerja sama antar pemangku kepentingan dalam penanganan fintech ilegal. Langkah-langkah tersebut akan membantu menciptakan lingkungan hukum yang lebih efektif dan selaras dengan paradigma RegTech dalam menangani praktik fintech ilegal di Indonesia.
STRENGTHENING INDONESIA’S GREEN INVESTMENT LAW: Legal Reconceptualisation toward Net-Zero Emissions under Green Constitution and Maslahah Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian; Lutfi, Mustafa; Bahagiati, Kurniasih
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 16, No 2 (2025): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v16i2.35169

Abstract

Indonesia’s green investment legal framework continues to exhibit substantive and institutional deficiencies, directly impeding the achievement of Net Zero Emissions targets and the broader national sustainable development agenda. This study employs a normative legal research method, utilising conceptual and statutory approaches, reinforced by doctrinal analysis of Green Constitution principles, the Islamic legal doctrine of maslahah, and Indonesia’s green investment and environmental governance policies. The findings reveal that the green investment legal framework has not ensured legal certainty, effective enforcement, or measurable environmental benefits due to regulatory fragmentation, weak integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance principles, and the absence of operationalisation of maslahah as a foundation for public policy; consequently, a reformulation of the legal paradigm is required, emphasising transparency, institutional accountability, and risk-based regulatory approaches to strengthen environmental protection and climate justice, support the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 13, enhance cross-sectoral green investment instruments, improve inter-institutional coordination, and align national policies with commitments under the Paris Agreement and the global sustainable development agenda in a consistent, measurable, adaptive, and socio-ecologically just manner. This research helps formulate a more climate-responsive and public welfare-oriented green investment legal model as a foundational framework for sustainable environmental policy-making in Indonesia, with implications for global environmental sustainability. Kerangka hukum investasi hijau di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai kelemahan substantif dan institusional yang berimplikasi langsung pada terhambatnya pencapaian target Net Zero Emissions dan agenda pembangunan berkelanjutan nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan peraturan perundang-undangan, yang diperkaya melalui analisis doktrinal terhadap prinsip Green Constitution, doktrin maslahah dalam hukum Islam, serta kerangka kebijakan investasi hijau dan tata kelola lingkungan di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum investasi hijau yang berlaku belum memberikan kepastian hukum, efektivitas penegakan, maupun manfaat lingkungan yang terukur akibat fragmentasi regulasi, lemahnya integrasi prinsip Environmental, Social, and Governance, serta belum teroperasionalisasinya nilai maslahah sebagai dasar kebijakan publik, sehingga diperlukan reformulasi paradigma hukum yang menekankan transparansi, akuntabilitas kelembagaan, dan pendekatan regulasi berbasis risiko dalam rangka memperkuat perlindungan lingkungan dan keadilan iklim, guna mendukung pencapaian Sustainable Development Goal 13 melalui penguatan instrumen investasi hijau lintas sektor, peningkatan koordinasi antar lembaga, penyelarasan kebijakan nasional dengan komitmen Paris Agreement dan agenda pembangunan berkelanjutan global secara konsisten, terukur, adaptif, dan berkeadilan sosial ekologis nasional berkelanjutan Indonesia. Kontribusi penelitian adalah perumusan model konseptual hukum investasi hijau yang proporsional, responsif terhadap perubahan iklim, berorientasi pada kesejahteraan umum sebagai fondasi kebijakan lingkungan berkelanjutan di Indonesia dan berimplikasi pada keberlanjutan lingkungan global.
Advocacy-Based Consumer Protection for Online Game Account Sabotage Victims: A Positive Law and Maqashid Sharia Perspective Wahyu; Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian; Fakhruddin; Miftahul Huda
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): December 2025 (on progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v16i3.15844

Abstract

The proliferation of digital commerce in Indonesia has generated new forms of consumer vulnerability, most notably the deliberate sabotage of online game accounts following completed transactions a phenomenon that inflicts both material and psychological harm upon consumers yet remains institutionally unaddressed. This study examines advocacy-based consumer protection for victims of online game account sabotage in Malang City, analyzed through the dual normative lenses of positive law and Maqashid Sharia. Employing an empirical legal research design with a socio-legal approach, the study draws on in-depth interviews with the Consumer Protection Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) of Malang City and five victim-informants, supplemented by normative analysis of applicable statutory instruments. The findings reveal that while Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions provide a sufficient normative basis for institutional advocacy, the UPT has not operationalized this mandate in digital consumer disputes. From the Maqashid Sharia perspective, account sabotage constitutes a simultaneous violation of hifz al-mal, hifz al-nafs, and hifz al-'aql, rendering institutional advocacy a legal and moral imperative. This study proposes a five-stage advocacy model and recommends the establishment of a dedicated digital consumer division within the UPT, supported by targeted regulatory reform governing virtual digital asset transactions.
Co-Authors A'la, Muhammad Amiril Achmad Zaenal Abidin Adelia Rachmaniar Airin Liemanto Arifien, Zainal Aris Mustriadhi Badruddin Hsubky Dewi Cahyandari, Dewi Dwi Fidhayanti Edi Susilo Faishal Agil Al Munawar Fakhruddin Feriska Nurjanah finda salimah Hasyimi Pradana Ikhsan Maksum Jafar Maulana Kurniasih Bahagiati Lestari, Diah Charisma Miftahul Huda Miftahul Huda Mustafa Lutfi Nasyi'ah, Iffaty Noh, Mohd Shahid bin Mohd Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Prasetyo, Ngesti D. Pratama, Agus Guna Ramadhita Ramadhita Ramadhita, Ramadhita Riaziz, Muhammad Ardani Ryan Basith Fasih Khan Saifullah Saifullah Saputra, Zaeniko Sheehan, Muhammad Yusuf Saladin Sheila Kusuma Wardani Amnesti Shinta Hadiyantina Suhala, Ahmad Wildan Supriyadi, Rizki Febrianto Wahyu Zulaicha, Siti