Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Culture in Law Enforcement Related to Child Criminal Offenses Anwar*, Aulia Citra; Ratnawati, Elfrida
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 4 (2023): Educational, Historical Studies and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i4.35279

Abstract

The existence of negotiations in criminal acts involving children aged 12-18 years, as well as the legal vacuum in criminal acts involving children under 12 years old, indicates that law enforcement for juvenile offenses has not been optimal. Society seems resigned to the legal system, leaving them no choice but to follow the existing Legal Culture. By using a normative juridical approach and a descriptive-analytical method, this research will provide an overview of legal culture in the enforcement of laws related to juvenile crimes. The results of this study indicate that the Legal Culture is still very low, prompting a recommendation for legal reforms such as creating regulations regarding repeated offenses in crimes involving children under 12 years old, establishing a Child Police and a Children's Court, and using social research through the Children's Court as a stepping stone to improve the Legal Culture.
Comparison of the Legal Systems of Indonesia and Singapore Regarding the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Process Pravana, Alam; Ratnawati, Elfrida
Journal of Social Science Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jss.v5i5.908

Abstract

This study aims to identify, understand, and analyse a comparison of the legal systems of Indonesia and Singapore regarding the industrial relations dispute settlement process. Indonesia is one of the countries that adheres to the civil law legal system, while Singapore adheres to the common law legal system. There are similarities as well as differences in the legal system in the process of resolving industrial relations disputes between Indonesia and Singapore. Elements of the societal changes that have occurred have affected Malay law and legal politics because there have been changes in the social structure and political dynamics, moreover, there are many descendants of Chinese in Singapore. This study uses a normative legal method with a comparative legal approach. The results of this study show that the industrial relations settlement process in Indonesia begins with bipartite negotiations, tripartite (mediation, conciliation, arbitration), and through industrial relations courts, while in Singapore it begins with collective bargaining or negotiation (collective bargaining), tripartite (conciliation or mediation), and through an arbitration institution (the Industrial Arbitration Court). In his book, Peter de Cruz related to labor law that the main comparative objective is to discover how the legal system is with different historical and cultural backgrounds. In terms of similarities, both Indonesia and Singapore put forward an initial negotiation in the form of deliberations or negotiations, while the difference that can be analysed is that the process of resolving industrial relations disputes in Singapore is relatively faster than in Indonesia. This is also influenced by the elements of societal change that have affected Malay law and legal politics because there have been changes in political dynamics, especially with the large number of Chinese descendants in Singapore. The process of resolving industrial relations disputes, which takes a long time and is complex in nature, requires an update that aims to be more efficient and faster.
REFORMASI HUKUM DI BIDANG KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL UNTUK MENGANTISIPASI PELANGGARAN MEREK MELALUI NAMA DOMAIN (CYBERSQUATTING) Astrini, Widiya Murti; Ratnawati, Elfrida
Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Dan Pengambangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jcm.v3i2.1627

Abstract

The article was written with the purpose of examining protection for registered trademark owners who become the victims of cybersquatting crime legally. The problem is focused on the implications of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications regarding the handling of cybersquatting cases in Indonesia. To approach this problem, the legal certainty theory is used as a reference. This study uses a type of normative legal research with secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study concluded that Law Number 20 of 2016 has not clearly explained and regulated cybersquatting, so it will be difficult to ensnare the perpetrators. Therefore, the government needs to formulate special regulations governing cybersquatting so that in the future it can provide legal certainty to the public.
POLITIK HUKUM DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Putra, Adde Pramana; Ratnawati, Elfrida
Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Dan Pengambangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jcm.v3i2.1628

Abstract

The global community is becoming more aware of corruption, which has fueled the expansion of the anti-corruption movement. Given that each country has a unique pattern of corruption-causing behavior, this anti-corruption movement seeks to eliminate corruption in each of these countries. Here, we finally understand what the Anti-Corruption Agency really is, or simply the Anti-Corruption Agency. The purpose of this research is to know and analyze the Criminal Law Reform in Corruption Crimes and to know and analyze the legal politics in the Criminal Law Reform in Corruption Crimes. This research is a normative legal investigation, which examines the laws and rules that exist or are used to deal with certain legal situations. Normative studies, also known as doctrinal research, are conducted on legal and regulatory documents and library items. Research in the library, especially secondary data examination. It is clear from the explanation above that the criminal act of office in the Criminal Code is the origin of corruption in Indonesia. Subsequent developments involving standards for proving criminal defamation occurred within criminal law as a distinct penal law. Regulations governing criminal acts of corruption outside the Criminal Code are developing rapidly. This arrangement is permitted according to Article 103 of the Criminal Code. The provisions of Chapters I-VIII of the text also apply to acts that are punishable by provisions of other laws, unless the law specifically stipulates otherwise, according to Article 103 of the Criminal Code.
Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Untuk Mencegah Praktik Monopoli di Indonesia Muttaqin, Muttaqin; Ratnawati, Elfrida
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2820

Abstract

In general, the existence of government affects the economy at various levels. There are governments that rigidly or aggressively control the economy, and governments that limit themselves to supporting the economy. The purpose of this research is to find out the law against monopolistic behavior and/or unfair business competition. The methodology used is normative juridical, namely qualitative. The method used is qualitative with legal sources in the form of books, academic journals, academic opinions, and legal cases using secondary data. The results of the research show that the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition is limited to examining all forms of agreements and acts against the law in Antimonopoly. Law, then carry out administrative actions, provide advice, and give consideration. This conclusion can be reached based on the information provided earlier. In addition, the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition is tasked with enforcing the law and providing monthly reports on its actions.
Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Tindak Pidana Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa Andrian, Willy; Ratnawati, Elfrida
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (361.719 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i3.10355

Abstract

Suatu tindak pidana tidak hanya dilakukan oleh pelaku yang sempurna akalnya, tetapi dapat pula dilakukan oleh orang dengan gangguan jiwa (ODGJ). Pada praktiknya, hakim pada putusannya kerap hanya terbatas kepada menjatuhkan putusan kepada terdakwa ODGJ dengan tidak dijatuhi pidana dan lepas dari segala tuntutan karena tidak dapat mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya. Akhirnya, ODGJ dilepas begitu saja, sedangkan ia membutuhkan perawatan mental khususnya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan jenis dan sumber bahan hukum diperoleh dari data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hak asasi bagi ODGJ yang melakukan tindak pidana sama halnya dengan manusia yang akalnya sempurna sebagai warga Negara. Perlindungan hukum bagi ODGJ yang melakukan tindak pidana secara normatif adalah baginya tidak dipidana atas alasan pemaaf karena tidak dapat mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya. Pengaturan tanggung jawab negara pasca pemidanaan ODGJ tidak tercantum khususnya pada KUHP, karena pada praktiknya putusan hakim hanya terbatas kepada amar bahwa terdakwa ODGJ tidak dijatuhi pidana karena tidak dapat mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya dan lepas dari segala tuntutan atas alasan pemaaf termasuk terbatas hanya kepada apa yang dituntut Jaksa Penuntut Umum. Dalam pengaturannya kedepan, KUHP perlu direformulasi terkait subjek pelaku tindak pidana perseorangan yang menderita gangguan jiwa dan sanksi tindakan bagi ODGJ.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN KARTU FLAZZ YANG DITERBITKAN OLEH BANK BCA Ramadhan, Fauzan; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.347

Abstract

Technological developments have brought changes to payments in the form of cash in conventional metal and paper forms, which have now developed in the form of electronic payment instruments. The use of non-cash payment electronic money (FLAZZ) besides being able to facilitate transactions can also cause losses to the owner if the FLAZZ is lost or stolen. Transactions using e-money can be carried out without going through an authorization process such as a PIN (Personal Identification Number) so that e-money can be used easily by unauthorized persons. Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 20/6/PBI/2018 contains regulations related to financial compensation but are not clear and detailed, so these unclear regulations lead to different interpretations between institutions. The purpose of this paper is to find out the legal arrangements for electronic money owners in the event of a loss on an e-money card and to find out the responsibility of the bank as a provider of non-cash payment instruments for losses suffered by e-money. - the owner of the money card. The research method used in this paper is normative legal research method. Studies show that electronic money compensation can only be made if there is damage from the issuer. The bank is not responsible for losses to e-money owners due to user negligence that violates consumer protection principles. Banks as issuers of electronic money are not responsible for losses to FLAZZ owners where this rule violates the principle of consumer protection.
RESTORATIF JUSTICE TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA UJARAN KEBENCIAN Lubis, Ali Hakim; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.349

Abstract

Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan saran terhadap para penegak hukum di negara ini dalam hal ini instansi Kepolisian, Kejaksaan dan Hakim agar dalam menangani suatu permasalahan hukum dengan mengedepankan pendekatan keadilan restorasi dalam penyelesaian kasus hukum ujaran kebencian. Metode penulisan ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan memakai sumber data sekunder dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penulisan ini mebuktikan bahwa penyelesaian dengan metode pendekatan Restorative Justice dapat digunakan kepada pelaku kejahatan ujaran kebencian sebagaimana ketentuan di dalam “ UU No. 19 Tahun 2016” tentang “Perubahan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008” Tentang “Informasi dan Transasksi Elektronik ( ITE )”. Penulisan ini dibuat untuk menjawab apakah penyelesaian secara restorative justice dalam tindak pidana ujaran kebencian merupakan sebuah solusi hukum? karena, semangat dari penyelesaian restortif justice adalah pemulihan terhadap keadaan semua bukan sebagai pembalasan. Oleh sebab itu, tujuannya agar upaya pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ujaran kebencian dapat diminimalisir dan dilakukan pendekatan dengan cara mediasi atau duduk bersama antara pelaku dengan korban tindak pidana ujaran kebencian.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WHISTLEBLOWER DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Podungge, Alamsyah; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.353

Abstract

This research examines the legal protection of whistleblowers in corruption crimes in Indonesia. The role of the reporter is very necessary or important in law enforcement. The presence of whistleblowers helps law enforcement agencies and makes them more accessible in uncovering cases of corruption criminal activity. Therefore, the state must provide legal protection to the Petitioners to protect their rights by law. Second, the state must also pay tribute to the reporter. Because the award is a form of recognition from the state to the applicants for their participation in helping law enforcement and protecting our country. Like the suspected corrupt journalists in Cirebon, they should be legally protected from prosecution. Nevertheless, he is under suspicion and the LPSK must assist in every way possible to ensure that his rights are protected or fully recognized. This study answers several questions. (1) Legal protection for reporters of corruption cases in Indonesia. (2) legal mechanisms in the criminal justice system to ensure the safety of reporters in corruption cases; This study uses social laws to study with the help of social sciences. First, the research results show that there is legal protection for reporters. This means that, based on Article 10 of Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, they do not only receive physical and immaterial legal protection, but also physical and psychological protection. Second, whistleblower regulations have not been regulated clearly so that special rules and legal guarantees are needed for whistleblowers to protect them from threats.
PENYELAMATAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF YS, Masyitoh; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.359

Abstract

This research aims to explore how state financial recovery is carried out in Indonesia and analyze it using progressive law. Law enforcement against fraud in government activities is still a major problem in Indonesia. This fraud resulted in state losses, but the fines and compensation imposed were far below the value of state losses. The formulation of the problem is how is the state financial recovery carried out in Indonesia? and has the state's financial recovery considered a progressive legal approach? This research is a qualitative research, with normative research methods and carried out by means of literature studies. The data used is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This research shows that there is a disparity in sentencing that causes recovery against the impact of losses on state finances that is not optimal. The verdict of the panel of judges seems to only focus on the interests of punishing the perpetrators rather than recovering the victims. In conclusion, in law enforcement, punishment alone does not restore state losses, so it has not fulfilled the people's sense of justice. Progressive steps are needed from law enforcement officials to take action to save state finances which are the people's rights. This is in line with progressive legal theory and improves the image of law enforcement in Indonesia for the better through judge decisions that prioritize a sense of justice for the people.