Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALISIS YURIDIS LEGALITAS CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBAYARAN DALAM TRANSAKSI BISNIS DI INDONESIA Margaretha, Selviana; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.485

Abstract

Abstract The flow of world globalization has greatly impacted technological advances, especially in the payment technology sector which can assist in a fast, safe and secure payment system. At this time we have realized that there is a named currencycryptocurrency, but in Indonesia it has not been regulated concretely regarding the use and legal protectioncryptocurrency. This study aims to examine the regulation of legality and legal protection of cryptocurrencies based on laws and regulations and policies made by the Indonesian government using normative juridical law methods and statutory regulations approaches. Regarding the legal materials used by the authors in the form of primary and secondary legal materials obtained by the authors from books, journals, literature, and data from the Indonesian Government, then the authors analyzed the data using descriptive and legal arguments to obtain systematic and comprehensive research results. Regarding the results of the research, it explains that Cryptocurrency in Indonesia has not been fully regulated, but several rules and policies have been issued by the authorities. Bank Indonesia prohibits the use of Cryptocurrency as a legal means of payment, but the use of Cryptocurrency as a digital asset is still permitted. Bappebti regulates Crypto exchanges, DGT regulates taxes on profits from Cryptocurrency transactions, and OJK warns the public about the risks of investing in the Crypto market. The Indonesian government is in the process of regulating cryptocurrencies more comprehensively through revisions to the capital market law and tax laws.
Indikasi Jual Rugi untuk Menyingkirkan Pelaku Usaha Lainnya Berdasarkan Uu No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Flora, Erica; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1052

Abstract

In buying and selling activities on the TikTok application, many business actors sell goods below market price with the aim of getting rid of their competitors or other business actors. Are the actions of business actors who reduce prices below market with the aim of eliminating their competitors permitted in Law no. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Business Competition? is the main problem of writing this research. The research method used is normative legal research, which uses secondary data and is analysed descriptively. The results of this research show that the actions of business actors who reduce prices below market with the aim of eliminating their competitors are prohibited according to the Business Competition Law, in the proof process using the approach rule of reason it is necessary to fulfil the elements of Article 20 of the Business Competition Law to be considered a selling practice at a loss. The flash sale program with the features live streaming in the TikTok application, is not necessarily a practice of selling at a loss carried out by business actors because it requires fulfilment of the elements, conditions, and validation of the sale of this practice.
Tinjauan Kasus Cyber Phising 16 Shop Berdasarkan UU ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Permata, Azzahra Ayu Nur; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1053

Abstract

This study discusses the case of cyber phishing carried out by the phishing Group 16 Shop, namely fraud by creating and selling fake website and software platforms resembling genuine electronic transaction sites for the purpose of deceiving targets. has the ITE Law Number 19 of 2016 been effectively implemented by the government to protect victims and enforce laws related to Cyber Phishing crimes? Is the principal problem of writing this study. The research method used in this study is normative legal research that connects various sources of legal material and is analyzed descriptively. This study aims to analyze the case of “Cyber Phishing 16 Shop” associated with ITE Law Number 19 of 2016 in the role of regulating and protecting cybercriminals related to electronic transactions