Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.757
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Ushuluddin Al-Ahkam Jaqfi : Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Al-Awqaf: Jurnal Wakaf dan Ekonomi Islam Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Citra Ilmu : Kajian Kebudayaan dan Keislaman Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies (JIOS) Jurnal Hukum Islam Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Al Jabiri: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman
Sahidin, Amir
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah Values in al-Māwardī’s Concept of the Caliphate Pramono, Muhamad Fajar; Sahidin, Amir
Al-Ahkam Volume 31, Nomor 2, Oktober 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (494.585 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2021.31.2.8612

Abstract

This article aims to reveal the values of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah in al-Māwardī's concept of the caliphate. He emphasizes the relationship between politics and maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, both of which aim to realize the benefit. Through literature study using the descriptive-analytical method, this paper finds that his basic concept of the caliphate is influenced by his understanding of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, including maqāṣid al-imāmah, wasīlah legal status, and maṣlaḥah rules. All three are criteria and conditions that a leader meets. He succeeded in formulating a series of prerequisites for a leader to realize the benefit of the people. These prerequisites are in line with the substance of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah.
أحكام سب الرسول عند القاضي عياض في كتابه "الشفا بتعريف حقوق المصطفى" (دراسة وصفية) Sahidin, Amir
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 12, No 2 (2021): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10788

Abstract

تنطلق هذه المقالة من كثرة الاستخفاف ببعض الناس فيما يتعلق بقوانين منتقدي الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم ، مع أن العلماء اتفقوا على وجوب قتل الجناة عندما لا يريدون التوبة. لذلك ، يحاول المؤلف في هذا المقال أن يبحث بعمق في قوانين منتقدي النبي محمد وفقًا لقاضي معروف في القرن السادس ، عياض بن موسى اليحسوبي ، في كتابه ، الشفابتعريف حقوق المصطفى. في كتابة هذا المقال ، يستخدم المؤلف نوعًا من الكتابة من خلال جمع البيانات المختلفة من المكتبة ، وهي طريقة البحث في المكتبة. وبناءً على هذه الدراسة يستنتج المؤلف أن لكل منتقد للنبي محمد الحق في القتل ، بينما تختلف الأسباب القانونية لقتله. وبحسب المذهبين الحنفي والشافعي فقد قتل لأنه ارتد بهذا الفعل. بينما بحسب المذهب المالكي والحنبلي قتل عقابا له على أفعاله. وأما الذمي الذي يندد بالنبي محمد فجمهور العلماء على أنه يجب قتله إلا إذا أسلم ، فإن العلماء المخالفين في الرأي يحررونه من عقوبة الإعدام ، لأن إسلامه يمحو الأخطاء التي تم إجراؤها من قبل. ثم تتعلق بالميراث وتدبير الميت والدفن ، ثم تبعًا لمكانة مقتله ، أي بسبب الردة أو الحد.This article starts from the many belittlement that some people make regarding the laws for detractors of the Prophet Muhammad, even though the scholars have agreed on the legal obligation to kill the perpetrators when they do not want to repent. So, in this article the author tries to examine more deeply regarding the laws for detractors of the Prophet Muhammad according to a well-known judge in the VI century, Iyad bin Musa al-Yahsubi, in his book, al-Syifâ fî Ta'rîf Huqûq al-Musthafâ. In writing this article, the author uses a qualitative type of writing by collecting various data from the library, namely the library research method. Based on this study, the author concludes that every detractor of the Prophet Muhammad has the right to be killed, while the legal reasons for his killing have different opinions; according to the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools he was killed because he had apostatized with this act;  whereas according to the Maliki and Hanbali schools he was killed as punishment al-had for his actions.  As for a dzimmi who denounces the Prophet Muhammad, the majority of scholars are of the opinion that he must be killed unless he converts to Islam, the scholars who differ in opinion will free him from the death penalty, because his Islam will erase the mistakes that have been made before. Then related to inheritance, management of corpses and burial, then depending on the status he was killed, namely because of apostasy or al-had.Artikel ini berangkat dari banyaknya peremehan yang dilakukan sebagian masyarakat terkait hukum-hukum bagi pencela Nabi Muhammad, padalah para ulama telah bersepakat tentang keharusan hukum bunuh bagi pelakunya ketika tidak mau bertaubat. Maka, dalam artikel ini penulis mencoba mengkaji lebih dalam berkenaan hukum-hukum bagi pencela Nabi Muhammad menurut seorang hakim terkenal abad ke-VI, Iyad bin Musa al-Yahsubi, dalam kitabnya, al-Syifâ fî Ta’rîf Huqûq al-Musthafâ. Dalam penulisan artikel ini, penulis menggunakan jenis penulisan kualitatif dengan mengumpulkan berbagai data dari perpustakaan, yaitu dengan metode library research. Berdasarkan kajian tersebut, penulis menyimpulkan bahwa setiap pencela Nabi Muhammad berhak untuk dibunuh, adapun sebab hukum bunuhnya para ulama berbeda pendapat; menurut Madzhab Hanafi dan Syafi’i ia dibunuh dikarenakan telah murtad dengan perbuatan tersebut; sedangkan menurut Madzhab Maliki dan Hanbali ia  dibunuh sebagai hukuman al-had atas tindakannya. Adapun bagi seorang dzimmi yang mencela Nabi Muhammad, maka jumhur ulama berpendapat akan keharusannya untuk dibunuh kecuali jika ia masuk ke dalam agama Islam, para ulama berselisih pendapat akan terbebasnya dari hukuman mati, tersebab dengan keislamannya akan menghapus kesalahan-kesalahan yang telah diperbuat sebelumnya. Kemudian terkait dengan warisan, pengurusan mayat dan pengkuburannya, maka tergantung dengan status ia dibunuh, yaitu karena murtad atau al-had.
Pendayagunaan Zakat dan Wakaf untuk Mencapai Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Sahidin, Amir
Al-Awqaf: Jurnal Wakaf dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 14 No 2 (2021): Al-Awqaf: Jurnal Wakaf dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Badan Wakaf Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47411/al-awqaf.v14i2.148

Abstract

Zakat is a property right that must be fulfilled by every Muslim who owns property and has fulfilled the conditions. While waqf is the main means in distributing assets or wealth of the people, as well as a substitute for public facilities. Both are Islamic Shari'a that exist for a noble purpose, bringing benefits both in the world and in the hereafter (maqashid al-syari'ah). Therefore, the study of zakat and waqf will be more important if studied with the maqashid al-syari'ah approach. This article discusses the utilization of zakat and waqf to achieve maqashid al-syari'ah. Through a library research study with a descriptive-analytical approach, it can be concluded that the utilization of zakat to achieve maqashid al-syari'ah includes three maqashid, namely: maqashid dini, maqashid ijtima'i, and maqashid iqtishadi. Meanwhile, the utilization of waqf to achieve maqashid al-syari'ah includes general and specific purposes for which wakat is prescribed. Then all should be directed to achieve al-maqashid al-khamsah, in the form of guarding religion, soul, mind, lineage and property. Keywords: zakat, waqf, maqashid al-syari'ah, maqashid al-khamsah.
Konsep Historis Al-Qur’an dalam Pandangan John Wansbrough: Sebuah Tinjauan worldview Islam Muslih, M Kholid; Muttaqin, Muhamad Shofwan; Sahidin, Amir
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5561

Abstract

In the book of Qur'anic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation, John Wansbrough gives a very sharp critique of the Qur'an. He argues, the Qur'an originates from the Judeo-Christian tradition and the intervention of the Prophet Muhammad on the contents of the Qur'an. Furthermore, it is understood in the view of the life of Muslims that the Qur'an is a holy book sourced from God without any human intervention. For this reason, This paper aims to provide a critical note on John Wansbrough's thoughts on the Qur'an with an overview of the Islamic worldview. This study is a literature study, tracing the works of John Wansbrough both from primary and secondary sources. The results of this study show the evidence: first of all, John Wansbrough's thought is not appropriate for studying and criticizing Qur'an, because he used the methods of historical criticism and literary criticism. Second, both methods have the same result, namely the questionable authenticity of the Qur'an, as in Jewish and Christian scriptures. Third, Wansbrough's fallacy is based on a wrong perspective on key concepts in Islam, i.e, the concepts of God, Prophethood, and Revelation in Islam.
Dialektika Teks dan Konteks dalam Framework Pemahaman Hadis Fata, Zahrul; Hidayat, Muhammad Sofian; Sahidin, Amir
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5002

Abstract

The Dialectics of Text and Context in the Hadith Understanding FrameworkThe position of the Prophet Muhammad as a human being on the one hand and also as a messenger who received revelations has become an important concern among ‘Ulama and Muslim scholars in understanding his hadiths. For those who see him from the human side, an understanding that is too contextual will emerge and lead to the loss of the sacredness of hadith. On the other hand, for those who put forward the Prophet side, it creates an understanding that is too textual untill leading to be more rigid and irrelevant to apply. This study is as a framework in understanding hadith proportionally, when to be textual and when to be contextual. Through a literature study with a descriptive-analytical approach, there some conclusions are derived from this study. Firstly, too contextual understanding of hadith tends to be practiced by liberals, while too textual understanding tends to be practiced by Zhahiriyah school. Secondly, there needs to be a clear separating line between hadith tasyri' and ghairu tasyri' so as not to fall into a contextual or textual understanding only. Thirdly, there must be limitations related to contextual and textual understanding. In regards to the boundaries that should not be influenced by the context, six categories are presented, namely, matters of faith, basic acts of worship, legal foundations, morals, sunnatullah, and special characteristics of the Prophet Muhammad. Meanwhile, there are four categories of text boundaries that can be changed, namely, branches of worship, the prophet's orders regarding the leader's policies, what comes from the prophet in the form of research or custom, and the acts of the prophet in the form of human habits.
Telaah Maqashid Al-Syari'ah antara Penalaran Tekstual dan Kontekstual (Studi Deskriptif Analisis) Sahidin, Amir; Kamaluddin, Imam
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 20 No 02 (2023): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v20i02.4830

Abstract

This article starts from misunderstanding of some Muslims in reasoning maqashid al-syari'ah. Some of them argue that maqashid al-syari'ah is only what appears of the text to nash, so they reason the nash textually. As a result, Islamic law becomes rigid and it is easy to blame you. Some of them reasoned too much about maqashid al-syari'ah, thus canceling the text of the nash. As a result, he was brave enough to deconstruct a permanent Islamic law. Therefore, this article will examine maqashid al-syari'ah with a fair and moderate study (wasathiyah) that is not as extreme as textual or contextual reasoning. Through a library research study with a descriptive analysis approach, it was found that wasathiyah reasoning in maqashid al-syari'ah reasoning is to distinguish between worship and muamalat matters in terms of the intentions behind them; seek maqashid al-shari'ah before determining the law; and has the principle that the shari'a which is built on the qath'i argument will not conflict with benefit and common sense.
Implementation of al-Attas’s Islamization on the Impact of Desacralization of Politics Pramono, Muhamad Fajar; Sahidin, Amir
Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies
Publisher : Center of Islamic and Occidental Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/jios.v1i2.26

Abstract

Desacralization of politics is a thought born from a Western secular perspective, aiming to separate religion from politics. It has a bad influence on human life both in epistemologically and methodologically aspects. In addition, this thought also had an impact and was adopted by Muslim scholars, one of which was Ali Abdul Raziq in his secular political theory. Ali argues that "The message of the Prophet is purely a religious message", and "Political matters are only a matter of reason and human experimentation". As an effort to diagnose and treat the negative impact of desacralization of politics on these Muslim scholars, it is necessary to implement the Islamization of knowledge initiated by al-Attas. Through library research with a descriptive analysis approach, it can be concluded that, firstly, the Islamization of knowledge can be carried out in two steps, de-westernization and integration. Secondly, as a result of this Islamization, Ali Abdul Raziq's political thought which was originally secular can be Islamized into, "The message of the Messenger of Allah is a treatise that covers the affairs of the world and the hereafter" and "Political matters must be left to revelation, reason and human experimentation which do not conflict with revelation.
The Implementation of Maqasid Al-Shariah in Shaykh Yusuf Al-Qardhawi’s Fiqh al-Aqalliyat Sahidin, Amir; Muhammad Alif Rahmadi, Muhammad Alif Rahmadi
Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 19 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi.v19i2.4724

Abstract

This article aimed to respond Muslim minorities' anxiety in the West, which deals with several dilemmatic choices of daily religious life activity. Muslim minorities are required to obey the teachings of Islam. Still, on the other hand, it contradicts with the reality of how difficult practicing Islamic teachings in Western countries according to the Islamic teachings such in Muslim-majority countries. Therefore, Shaykh Yusuf al-Qardhawi saw the need to initiate fiqh that could guide Muslim minorities in the West to continue to practice Islamic law, although in a slightly different format from prevailing teachings in Muslim-majority countries. This fiqh is popularly known as Fiqh al-Aqalliyat. As initiator, Shaykh Yusuf al-Qardhawi was very concerned about the implementation of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. This article used library research. Based on this study, it can be concluded that the implementation of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in Shaykh Yusuf al-Qardhawi's Fiqh al-Aqalliyat can be seen from the basis of his arguments, which aims such as the basis of the proposition relying on the law. It is also based on the main source of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, the principle of paying attention to universal fiqh rules, etc. Furthermore, we can also consider his fatwas, such as the problem of overseeing the implementation of Friday prayers, the law of inheritance from non-Muslims, christmas compliment to Ahlul Kitab, and establishing Islamic institutions from zakat assets.
FRAMEWORK STUDI MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH; ANTARA PENALARAN TEKSTUAL DAN KONTEKSTUAL Sahidin, Amir
Al Jabiri: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): AL-JABIRI : Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam
Publisher : DAS Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article starts from misunderstanding of some Muslims in reasoning maqashid al-syari'ah. Some of them argue that maqashid al-syari'ah is only what appears of the text to nash, so they reason the text textually. As a result, Islamic law becomes rigid and it is easy to blame you. Some of them reasoned too much about maqashid al-syari'ah, thus canceling the text of the nash. As a result, he was brave enough to deconstruct a permanent Islamic law. Therefore, this article will examine maqashid al-syari'ah with a fair and moderate study (wasathiyah) that is not as extreme as textual or contextual reasoning. Through a critical analysis study of various authoritative literature, it was found that, first: wasathiyah reasoning in maqashid al-syari'ah reasoning is to distinguish between worship and muamalat matters in terms of the intentions behind them; second: looking for maqashid al-shari'ah before determining the law; third: principled that the shari'a which is built on the qath'i argument will not conflict with benefit and common sense.
PRO-KONTRA KEMUNGKINAN MELIHAT ALLAH (RU’YATULLAH) DI AKHIRAT DENGAN MATA KEPALA Nazahah, Inayah; Sahidin, Amir
Al Jabiri: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): AL-JABIRI : Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam
Publisher : DAS Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In Islamic treasures, the discussion of the science of kalam has its own charm because it discusses typical Islamic thoughts, so that the Islamic building becomes stronger. One of the most important matters related to the science of kalam, is the possibility of seeing Allah (ru'yatullah) in the afterlife which reaps the pros and cons. For this reason, this article will examine the pros and cons of the possibility of seeing Allah in the hereafter by focusing on the study of the arguments or arguments used by both parties, then continue with the rebuttals. Based on the study of the type of library research with a critical analysis approach, it can be concluded. First, seeing Allah in the hereafter for Ahl sunnah wal jama'ah is a matter that must be believed by every human being who has many arguments and has reached the mutawatir level. Second, for the Mu'tazilah and those who agree with them, they do not believe that Allah can be seen in the hereafter, they postulate several verses of the Qur'an with their understanding of reason. Third, the arguments that negate this possibility are very weak and can be refuted by the experts of the sunnah wa jama'ah, so that the argument is weak, and vice versa, showing that the arguments of the Ahl sunnah wa jama'ah are stronger.
Co-Authors Abdurahim, Abdurahim Binte Mochamad Sandisi, Zahratur Rofiqah Harda Armayanto Hidayat, Muhammad Sofian Imam Kamaluddin Jarman Arroisi Mochamad Sandisi, Zahratur Rofiqah Binte Moh. Isom Mudin Muhamad Fajar Pramono Muhammad Alif Rahmadi, Muhammad Alif Rahmadi Muhammad Fahmi Amrullah, Muhammad Fahmi Muslih, M Kholid Muslih, Mohammad Kholid Muttaqin, Muhamad Shofwan Nazahah, Inayah Sujiat Zubaidi Zahrul Fata