Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.103
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Spektrum Hukum Jurnal Hukum Respublica JOURNAL EQUITABLE Ensiklopedia of Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Pagaruyuang Law Journal Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Asian Journal of Aquatic Sciences Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Collegium Studiosum Journal Journal of Social Research Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research ANDREW Law Journal Journal of Social Science and Education Research
Harahap, Irawan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 50 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 50 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM SURAT TELEGRAM KABARESKRIM KEPOLISIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TENTANG PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA MENGENYAMPINGKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Tampubolon, Subiarto Aprido; Harahap, Irawan; Kadaryanto, Bagio
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1347

Abstract

The policy of returning state losses to drop criminal proceedings that have the potential to weaken law enforcement, damage legal certainty, create moral hazard, and be unfair to the wider community. Returning state losses is important, but the criminal law process against perpetrators of corruption must continue to maintain the principle of justice, ensure a deterrent effect, and maintain the integrity of law in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the legal position of the telegram from the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Republic of Indonesia Police regarding the return of state financial losses ignoring criminal acts of corruption in the perspective of legal certainty is that the return of state financial losses that ignore criminal acts of corruption should be reviewed so as not to conflict with the principle of legal certainty. Efforts to return state losses are indeed important, but they must not eliminate criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption. Enforcement of corruption law must be carried out firmly to provide a deterrent effect and ensure the achievement of the expected justice in the legal system. Legal certainty is an important key in maintaining the integrity of law enforcement, especially in corruption cases that harm the public interest. The legal consequences of the telegram from the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Republic of Indonesia Police regarding the return of state financial losses by ignoring corruption in the perspective of legal certainty are the legal consequences of the Telegram Letter from the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit which regulates the return of state losses by ignoring corruption in the perspective of legal certainty, creating several serious impacts on the legal system in Indonesia. This policy weakens the principle of legal certainty, reduces the deterrent effect, and damages the integrity of the function of criminal law in the context of corruption. In order to maintain public trust and ensure substantive justice, it is important for this policy to be reviewed so that it remains in line with the basic principles of law enforcement, especially in eradicating corruption that is detrimental to the state and society.
IMPLEMENTASI PENYEDIAAN RUANGAN KHUSUS TERHADAP ANAK DI POLRESTA PEKANBARU Siregar, Marito; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Harahap, Irawan
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1349

Abstract

In general, children in adult prisons are at risk of experiencing trauma and other psychological problems because the prison environment is not in accordance with their developmental needs. Children placed in adult prisons can experience great mental and emotional stress. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the implementation of the provision of special rooms for children at the Pekanbaru Police based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system has not been running well, because there are still child perpetrators who are combined in adult rooms. The provision of this special room aims to ensure that children in conflict with the law receive treatment in accordance with their rights as children. This special room is designed to separate children from adult prisoners, in order to avoid negative influences that can damage the child's psychological development. Obstacles in the implementation of the provision of special rooms for children at the Pekanbaru Police based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system are the limited facilities and infrastructure that are in accordance with the needs of children, such as separate rooms from adult detention rooms, lack of budget and facilities to build special rooms for children, and human resources related to the lack of training for officers responsible for handling children in conflict with the law. Efforts to overcome obstacles in the implementation of the provision of special rooms for children at the Pekanbaru Police based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system are to provide a budget and allocation of resources to build facilities and infrastructure that are in the provisions of laws and regulations, more intensive coordination with related agencies, such as social institutions and local governments, to provide special rooms in accordance with legal provisions, and include improving psychological and rehabilitation facilities, so that children are not only placed in separate rooms, but also receive treatment that supports social recovery and reintegration.
PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA DALAM KEBAKARAN HUTAN DAN LAHAN Hanipah; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Harahap, Irawan
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1358

Abstract

The judge decided on Article 99 in a case and chose to rule based on Article 99 paragraph (1), indicating that the judge assessed the environmental violation as being caused by negligence rather than intent. Therefore, the punishment imposed is lighter compared to the sanctions under Article 98 paragraph (1), although still severe, considering the environmental impact caused. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal considerations of judges in their decisions on forest and land fire cases and to examine the legal provisions concerning the criminal act of forest and land burning in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the research findings, it was revealed that the legal considerations of judges in decisions on forest and land fire cases involve assessing various legal aspects and evidence presented during the trial. The judges evaluate whether the defendant's actions fulfill the elements of a criminal act as stipulated in the relevant laws. Proof of intent, negligence, and the impact of the fire are crucial aspects. The verdict is also influenced by the extent of environmental damage, the impact on public health, and the economic losses incurred. Additionally, the judge considers the defendant's active role or negligence in preventing the fire. In some rulings, as in the above case, although the defendant burned the land on orders from another party, malicious intent or intent was not found. Regarding the legal provisions for forest and land burning in Indonesia, Law Number 32 of 2009 strictly prohibits such acts. Article 69 paragraph (1) letter h prohibits land clearing by burning, while Article 108 stipulates criminal sanctions for offenders with imprisonment ranging from 3 to 10 years and fines varying from IDR 3 billion to IDR 10 billion. Harsher penalties are imposed if the act causes environmental pollution or endangers human health, as regulated in Articles 98 and 99. In cases where burning causes serious injury or death, the punishment can reach 15 years in prison and fines of up to IDR 15 billion. Additionally, business entities found guilty of this crime may face additional sanctions such as license revocation.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN TEBAK ANGKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRES INDRAGIRI HULU BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA Nainggolan, Awet Lestari; Harahap, Irawan; Kadaryanto, Bagio
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1359

Abstract

Number guessing gambling in the jurisdiction of the Indragiri Hulu Police is a serious threat to public security and order. The social and economic impacts resulting from this gambling are disturbing the community and damaging family life. Reports from families and the community are important elements in taking action against gambling. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that law enforcement of the crime of number guessing gambling in the jurisdiction of the Indragiri Hulu Police based on the criminal code has not been running optimally, because there are still cases of number guessing gambling every year in the Indragiri Hulu Police. The police conducted raids and collected evidence supporting the crime of number guessing gambling. Obstacles in law enforcement of the crime of number guessing gambling in the jurisdiction of the Indragiri Hulu Police based on the criminal code are the lack of sufficient evidence due to the high level of confidentiality, limited resources available, and minimal reports from the public, because the public is often reluctant to report number guessing gambling for certain reasons, such as fear of revenge from the perpetrators or because they themselves are involved in the practice. Efforts to overcome obstacles in enforcing the criminal law on number guessing gambling in the jurisdiction of the Indragiri Hulu Police based on the criminal code are the use of more sophisticated technology and surveillance systems, the need to increase the capacity of law enforcement officers in terms of investigation and use of technology, law enforcement against perpetrators of number guessing gambling is carried out firmly and consistently without discrimination, and strengthening intelligence networks and closed investigations.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENADAHAN BARANG HASIL CURIAN DI POLRES ROKAN HILIR BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA Siregar, Anta Arief; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Harahap, Irawan
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1369

Abstract

Items such as electronics, motor vehicles, and other valuable goods are sold quickly, making stolen goods difficult to trace. This criminal network complicates law enforcement efforts. Law enforcement against theft and fencing must be carried out firmly to maintain order and a sense of security in society. Perpetrators of theft and fencing can both be subjected to criminal sanctions in accordance with the provisions of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP). The purpose of this study is to analyze law enforcement against fencing stolen goods in Rokan Hilir Police jurisdiction based on the Penal Code. The method used is sociological legal research. The results of the study reveal that law enforcement against fencing stolen goods in the Rokan Hilir Police jurisdiction, based on the Penal Code, has not been effectively implemented. This is evidenced by the increasing prevalence of fencing stolen goods, as referred to in Article 480 of the Penal Code. This article regulates the criminal act of fencing, where a person can be punished if they are proven to have knowingly received, purchased, or stored goods resulting from a criminal act such as theft. The obstacles in law enforcement against fencing stolen goods in the Rokan Hilir Police jurisdiction, based on the Penal Code, include the difficulty of proving the element of intent on the part of the fencing perpetrators, the low public awareness of reporting fencing activities or involvement in the trade of stolen goods, challenges in identifying fencing perpetrators, and limited resources and technology for tracking stolen goods transactions, which further hinder the law enforcement process. Efforts to overcome these obstacles include improving coordination among law enforcement agencies, strengthening the capacity of investigative personnel in understanding and applying the articles governing the crime of fencing, and adopting a more inclusive approach with the community.
Criminal Law Enforcement of Consumer Rights of Victims of Dangerous Cosmetics in Pekanbaru Based on Law No. 8 of 1999 Ernawaty, Beby; Harahap, Irawan; Pardede, Rudi
Journal of Social Science and Education Research Vol. 1 No. 8 (2024): Journal of Social Science and Education Research
Publisher : Raudhah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/hcnvqn02

Abstract

The enforcement of criminal law on consumer rights for victims of hazardous cosmetics in the jurisdiction of the Riau Police, particularly in Pekanbaru City, under Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, faces significant challenges. Article 4 of the Consumer Protection Law grants consumers the right to comfort, security, and safety in using products, along with accurate, clear, and honest information. However, hazardous cosmetics containing substances like mercury and hydroquinone continue to circulate freely, both in physical stores and online, indicating that law enforcement intended to protect consumers remains inadequate. Using a sociological legal approach, this research reveals a gap between the law and its implementation, as unsafe cosmetics are widely available, contradicting consumer rights as defined in the Consumer Protection Law. Key obstacles include low public awareness and participation, as many victims fail to report cases; limited inter-agency coordination, particularly with the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM); and restricted access to data on the distribution and sale of dangerous cosmetics, especially those sold online. To address these enforcement challenges, it is necessary to improve institutional coordination, create an online complaint platform for consumers to report cases directly and anonymously, strengthen legal evidence and investigative depth in cases involving hazardous cosmetics, and conduct regular market surveillance to prevent the distribution of illegal and harmful products. These measures are essential to bridging the gap between the legal framework and practical enforcement, ultimately ensuring better consumer protection against the risks posed by hazardous cosmetics.
ANALYSIS OF REGULATIONS FOR DETERMINING THE LIMITED PROTECTION STATUS OF TERUBUK FISH (TENUALOSA MACRURA) PERMEN-KP NO. 210 OF 2023 REFERRING TO NO. 58/PERMEN-KP/2020 CONCERNING CAPTURE FISHERIES BUSINESSES Thamrin, Thamrin; Harahap, Irawan; Oktapani, Silm
Asian Journal of Aquatic Sciences Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/ajoas.8.1.33-40

Abstract

This research aims to determine the form of analysis, as well as determine the obstacles and constraints in implementing the Decree of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number: PERMEN-KP No. 210 of 2023 if guided by PERMEN-KP No. 58 of 2020 concerning capture fisheries businesses. In scientific research using a qualitative approach with an interpretative normative paradigm, the available theories used for research are constructed as an imperfect building, and this research is descriptive. In implementing the Decree of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number: PERMEN-KP No. 210 of 2023 concerning Limited Protection of Terubuk Fish (Tenualosa macrura) has not been implemented in the socialization, sea patrol and monitoring activities carried out by the Government, Indonesian National Army, Police and community monitoring groups. If PERMEN-KP No. 210 of 2023 is guided by PERMEN-KP No. 58 of 2020 concerning capture fisheries businesses, there will be discrepancies between the rules made and the rules applied in the field. The effectiveness of the implementation of the Decree of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia on the availability of fish resources legally and seen from fishermen's catches has increased and is quite effective, but it is not yet significant because sanctions for violations have not been realized and the obstacles and obstacles to the implementation of the Decree when referring to PERMEN-KP No. 58 of 2020 should not be needed. Fishermen who have small boats (< 5 gross tonnage) are allowed to catch terubuk (Tenualosa macrura) in conservation areas following PERMEN – KP No. 58 of 2020.
DISPARITY OF JUDGES' DECISIONS AGAINST CLASS I NARCOTIC DISTRIBUTORS IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PEKANBARU DISTRICT COURT BASED ON LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2009 ON NARCOTICS Ariyanto, Yuli; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Harahap, Irawan
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.34380

Abstract

ABSTRACT Article 114 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, which states that it regulates sanctions for people who without rights or against the law offer for sale, sell, buy, receive, act as intermediaries in buying and selling, exchange, or hand over Class I Narcotics.” Research objectives: to analyze the disparity in judges' decisions against Class I Narcotics dealers in the Pekanbaru City area based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, to formulate the causal factors; to find efforts to overcome it. Research methods: sociological legal research, legislative approach and case approach; research location: Pekanbaru Police; population and samples from relevant sources; data sources are primary, secondary and tertiary; data collection techniques are observation, structured interviews and document/literature studies; data analysis is qualitative; the conclusion is inductive. The results of the study are that the implementation of the intended disparity has not been carried out properly. The conclusion is First, the implementation has not been good, proven by the disparity in 6 court decisions for perpetrators who are distributors of methamphetamine narcotics from 2021 to 2023 where the disparity cannot be justified. Second, the factors causing the disparity are from the legislative factors, law enforcement officers, facilities/facilities and the community. Efforts to overcome this are From the legislative factors, the disparity in judges' decisions that are not oriented towards achieving justice and legal benefits for the wider community, should not be carried out by judges so that there are no complaints; conduct socialization of the Criminal Code which regulates the Classification of Perpetrators (Dader); judges also refer to the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1386 K/Pid.Sus/2011 dated August 3, 2011 to avoid disparity in decisions that do not provide justice. From the law enforcement factor, the Public Prosecutor takes legal action; the judge also issues a verdict based on the facts of the indictment prepared by the Public Prosecutor based on the facts that occurred; splitting (splitting of case files) is done if the role or weight of the evidence is different in a case. From the facility factor, namely the advocate with the local court conducting legal socialization regarding the importance of the presence of an advocate. From the community factor, namely the community finds out about each role of the perpetrator; the community is given legal socialization regarding matters that affect the severity of the crime in the judge's verdict; the judge is really careful in analyzing the consequences caused by the perpetrator; The defendant presents mitigating witnesses at the trial; The defendant/defendant's legal advisor takes legal action.  Keywords: Dealers, Narcotics, Disparity ABSTRAK Pasal 114 ayat (1) Undang–Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, yang menyatakan bahwamengatur sanksi bagi orang yang tanpa hak atau melawan hukum menawarkan untuk dijual, menjual, membeli, menerima, menjadi perantara dalam jual beli, menukar, atau menyerahkan Narkotika Golongan I.” Tujuan penelitian: untuk menganalisis disparitas putusan hakim terhadap pelaku pengedar Narkotika Golongan I di wilayah Kota Pekanbaru berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, untuk merumuskan faktor penyebabnya; untuk menemukan upaya mengatasinya. Metode penelitiaan: penelitian hukum sosiologis, pendekatan perundang–undangan dan pendekatan kasus; lokasi penelitian: Polresta Pekanbaru; populasi dan sampel dari narasumber relevan; sumber data adalah primer, sekunder dan tersier; teknik pengumpulan data adalah observasi, wawancara terstruktur dan studi dokumen/kepustakaan; analisis data adalah kualitatif; kesimpulannya induktif. Hasil penelitian adalah Implementasi disparitas yang dimaksud belum terlaksana dengan baik. Kesimpulannya adalah Pertama, implementasinya belum baik dibuktikan terdapat disparitas terhadap 6 putusan pengadilan bagi pelaku yang merupakan pengedar dalam Narkotika jenis sabu– sabu tahun 2021 sampai 2023 dimana disparitas tidak tidak dapat dibenarkan. Kedua, Faktor penyebab disparitas dari faktor perundang-undangan, aparat penegak hukum, sarana/ fasilitas dan amsyarakat. Upaya mengatsinya ialah Dari faktor perundang-undangan, disparitas putusan hakim yang tidak berorientasi pada tercapainya keadilan dan kemanfaatan hukum bagi masyarakat luas, jangan dilakukan oleh hakim supaya tidak ada komplain; melakukan sosialisasi hukum KUHP yang mengatur mengenai Klasifikasi Pelaku (Dader); hakim juga mengacu putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 1386 K/Pid.Sus/2011 tanggal 3 Agustus 2011 untuk menghindari disparitas putusan yang tidak memberikan keadilan. Dari faktor aparat penegak hukum, Jaksa Penuntut Umum melalukan upaya hukum; hakim menjatuhkan vonis juga berdasarkan fakta dakwaan yang disusun oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum berdasarkan fakta yang terjadi; splitzing (pemecahan berkas perkara) dilakukan jika peran maupun berat barang bukti berbeda dalam suatu tindak perkara. Dari faktor sarana fasilitas yaitu yaitu advokat dengan pengadilan setempat melakukan sosialisasi hukum terkait pentingnya kehadiran advokat. Dari faktor mayarakat yaitu masyarakat mencari tahu tentang masing-masing peran pelaku; masyarakat diberikan sosialiasi hukum terkait hal-hal yang mempengaruhi berat ringannya pidana dalam vonis hakim; hakim benar-benar cermat dalam menganalisis akibat yang disebabkan oleh pelaku; Terdakwa mengadirkan saksi yang meringankan di persidangan; Terdakwa/ penasehat hukum terdakwa melakukan upaya hukum.Kata Kunci: Pengedar, Narkotika, Disparitas
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF CATEGORY I NARCOTICS CRIMES IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE ROKAN HILIR DISTRICT COURT Sinaga, Richard; Harahap, Irawan; Kadaryanto, Bagio
EKSEKUSI Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v7i1.34383

Abstract

ABSTRACT Article 112 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) Jo. Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics regulates the minimum criminal threat of 4 years and 5 years. The purpose of the study To analyze law enforcement against perpetrators of class I Narcotics crimes at the Rokan Hilir District Court based on the regulation; To analyze obstacles and efforts to overcome them. The research method is sociological legal research with a legislative, case and analytical approach; the research location is the Rokan Hilir District Court; population and samples from relevant sources; data sources are primary, secondary and tertiary; data collection techniques are observation, non-structural interviews and document/library studies; data analysis is qualitative with inductive conclusions. The results of the study are that law enforcement at the Rokan Hilir Court has not been implemented properly. The conclusion is First, law enforcement against perpetrators of Class I Narcotics crimes in the Court based on regulations has not been running well where judges impose sentences below the minimum threat provisions in the Article for perpetrators of methamphetamine narcotics crimes in 2022 and 2023. Second, obstacles come from legislative factors; law enforcement officers; and the community (defendants and mitigating witnesses). Efforts to overcome this are Legislative factors, namely the judge's decision provides justice, benefits and legal certainty for the wider community; apply the rules carefully and appropriately; judges apply them to defendants who meet the criteria in the Circular of the Supreme Court; The government amends Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics because in certain circumstances it is no longer in accordance with the needs of law enforcement; Judges apply the law based on the substance of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Law enforcement factors, namely judges are more careful and do not have certain interests and are in accordance with the examination concept in implementing Letter A number 1 of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 02 of 2015; Public Prosecutors are more careful and thorough in preparing the indictment and avoiding certain interests and then taking legal action. Community factors, namely the defendant and mitigating sanctions tell the truth in court; the judge's consideration in imposing a light sentence is truly in accordance with the conditions of the defendant when examined in court; The defendant can present mitigating witnesses.Keywords: Methamphetamine, Judge's verdict, Rokan Hilir ABSTRAK Pasal 112 ayat (1) maupun ayat (2)  Jo. Pasal 132 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika mengatur ancaman pidana minimum yaitu 4 tahun dan 5 tahun. Tujuan penelitian Untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana Narkotika golongan I di Pengadilan Negeri Rokan Hilir berdasarkan regulasi tersebut; Untuk menganalisis hambatan dan upaya mengatasinya. Metode penelitiaan ialah penelitian hukum sosiologis dengan pendekatan perundang–undangan, kasus dananalitis; lokasi penelitian ialah Pengadilan Negeri Rokan Hilir; populasi dan sampel dari narasumber relevan; sumber data ialah primer, sekunder dan tersier; teknik pengumpulan data ialah observasi, wawancara non struktural dan studi dokumen/ kepustakaan; analisis data ialah kualitatif dengan kesimpulan induktif.  Hasil penelitiannya penegakan hukumnya di Pengadilan Rokan Hilir belum terlaksana dengan baik. Kesimpulannya ialah Pertama, Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana Narkotika Golongan I di Pengadilan tersebut berdasarkan regulasi belum berjalan dengan baik dimana hakim menjatuhkan pidana dibawah ketentuan ancaman minimum dalam Pasal tersebut bagi pelaku tindak pidana narkotika jenis shabu pada tahun 2022 dan 2023. Kedua, hambatan berasal dari faktor perundang-undangan; aparat penegak hukum; dan masyarakat (terdakwa dan saksi yang meringankan). Upaya mengatasinya ialah Faktor perundang-undangan, yaitu putusan hakim memberikan, keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat luas; menerapkan aturan tersebut dengan cermat dan tepat; hakim menerapkannya terhadap terdakwa yang memenuhi kriteria dalam Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung tersebut; Pemerintah melakukan perubahan Undang–Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika karena dalam keadaan tertentu tidak sesuai lagi dengan kebutuhan penegakan hukum; Hakim menerapkan hukum berlandaskan pada substani Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Faktor aparat penegak hukum, yaitu hakim lebih cermat dan tidak punya kepentingan tertentu serta sesuai dengan konsep eksaminasi dalam menerapkan Huruf A angka 1 Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 02 Tahun 2015; Jaksa Penuntut Umum lebih cermat dan teliti menyusun surat dakwaan serta menghindari adanya kepentingan tertentu kemudian melakukan upaya hukum. Faktor masyarakat, yaitu terdakwa dan sanksi yang meringankan berkata jujur di persidangan; pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan vonis yang ringan memang benar-benar sesuai dengan kondisi-kondisi terdakwa saat dilakukan pemeriksaan di persidangan; Terdakwa dapat menghadirkan saksi yang meringankan.Kata Kunci: Metamfetamina, Putusan, Rokan Hilir
APPLICATION OF SANCTIONS FOR PERPETRATORS OF PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN COMMITTED BY PARENTS IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PEKANBARU CITY POLICE BASED ON LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2014 CONCERNING CHILD PROTECTION Bangun, Tri Suranta; Harahap, Irawan; Pardede, Rudi
EKSEKUSI Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v7i1.34957

Abstract

ABSTRACT Article 80 paragraph (1) Jo. Paragraph (4) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection Jo. Article 44 paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence Jo. Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code Jo. Article 356 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, regulates the prohibition and legal sanctions for parents who commit physical violence in the form of ordinary abuse against their children. The research method is sociological legal research, legislative and case approaches; research location Pekanbaru Police; population and samples from relevant sources; data sources are primary, secondary and tertiary; data collection techniques are observation, non-structural interviews and document studies; data analysis is qualitative; conclusion: inductive. The application of sanctions for perpetrators of physical violence against children committed by parents in the jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru Police based on the regulation has been implemented but the results have not been optimal in 2021 to 2023, as evidenced by several perpetrators not being prosecuted because there was peace between the perpetrators and victims. The obstacles are the law enforcement/government factor, the facility/facility factor and the community factor. Third, efforts to overcome these obstacles are Against the law enforcement/government factor, namely increasing the number of investigators; The police increase cooperation and coordination with the Pekanbaru City Social Service (child social workers); The police implement appropriate policies by prioritizing the interests of children (victims). Against the facility/facility factor, namely the local police increase the budget. Against the community factor, namely the victim is accompanied by a child social worker from the Pekanbaru City Social Service and involves the role of the victim's family who knows the condition of the victim and perpetrator in peace efforts; Investigators maximize separate examinations between the perpetrator and the victim; Investigators apply the right techniques in examining the perpetrator; during the examination the child is not confronted with his parents (perpetrators).Keywords: Abuse, Children, Pekanbaru
Co-Authors Afrita, Indra Agustin, Elvan ALFARISI , SALMAN Arifin, Dhani Fratama Ariyanto, Yuli Azmi, Bahrum Bagio Kadaryanto, Bagio Bangun, Tri Suranta Eno Suwarno Ernawaty, Beby Fahli, Zul Fahmi Fanny Fanny Hanipah Haq, Miftahul Hartono, Wandi Hutagaol, Hendra Dm Irwan Kadri Libra, Robert m, Tri Novita Sari Manulang, Johanes Gabe Saputra Muhammad Rizki Muhardi, Dekky Nainggolan, Awet Lestari Nugraha, Ahmad Angga Oktapani, Silm Pardede, Rudi Pratiwi, Riantika Rachman, Yusnidar ratiwi, Riantika P Samosir, Mangaratua Saputra, Dodi Ripo Sihombing, Rainer Wilona Sihotang, Tunggul Silaen, Gabriel Francius Sinaga, Richard Siregar, Anta Arief Siregar, Marito Sistha, Windy Widya Situmorang, Urbanus Sormin, Yohanes Untung Susi Susanti Suwisman, Suwisman Tampubolon, Subiarto Aprido Thamrin Thamrin Triana, Yeni Welli, Dion Winstar, Yelia Nathassa Yalid Yalid