Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

HAK DESAIN PAKAIAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 2000 TENTANG DESAIN INDUSTRI Haq, Miftahul; Harahap, Irawan
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 4 (2025): Vol. 7 No. 4 Edisi 3 Juli 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i4.3364

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to: (1) analyze the form of legal protection for clothing design rights holders under Law Number 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design; (2) identify obstacles in the legal protection process; and (3) formulate efforts to overcome these obstacles. This research employs a normative legal method, with secondary data sources consisting of literature related to intellectual property, industrial design, and statutory regulations. The results indicate that legal protection is provided through preventive measures-by registering industrial designs with novelty elements-and repressive measures-by enforcing laws against infringements, either through litigation or alternative dispute resolution. Major obstacles include low public awareness, limited government socialization efforts, complicated registration bureaucracy, and relatively high registration fees. Improvement efforts involve revising the law, utilizing information technology for online registration, enhancing law enforcement capacity, and strengthening the role of both government and society in protecting industrial design rights.Keywords: Legal Protection, Industrial Design, Exclusive Right.
IMPLEMENTASI LARANGAN PEMBUKAAN LAHAN DENGAN CARA MEMBAKAR Sihombing, Rainer Wilona; Harahap, Irawan; Pardede, Rudi
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i1.1704

Abstract

This provision is reinforced in Article 108, which stipulates that any person who carries out land burning as referred to in Article 69 paragraph (1) letter h shall be subject to imprisonment for a minimum of 3 (three) years and a maximum of 10 (ten) years, and a fine of at least IDR 3,000,000,000 (three billion rupiah) and at most IDR 10,000,000,000 (ten billion rupiah). This behavior not only disrupts public comfort due to the smoke produced but also causes environmental damage and air pollution, even though regulations prohibit such practices. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of the prohibition on land clearing by burning based on Law Number 32 of 2009 in the jurisdiction of the Rokan Hulu Police, to examine the obstacles in its implementation, and to identify efforts to overcome these obstacles. The research method used is sociological juridical research. Based on the findings, the implementation of the prohibition has been carried out but not optimally. Communities continue to engage in small-scale burning in secret, especially at the beginning of the dry season. Although warning signs and banners prohibiting burning have been installed in several locations, supervision and patrols remain uneven. The main obstacles include the low awareness and understanding of the community regarding the environmental and legal impacts of burning, limited human resources and environmental investigation equipment, as well as difficulties in obtaining sufficient evidence and witnesses in the criminal process. Efforts to overcome these obstacles include enhancing environmental education and awareness programs for communities—particularly among farmers in fire-prone areas increasing the technical capacity of investigators through training on environmental law and fire forensics, and strengthening evidence collection using aerial monitoring technologies such as drones and GPS-based surveillance cameras to document burning locations as part of legal evidence.
Implementation of Supervision on the Sale of Hard Drugs in Dumai City: Normative Analysis and Preventive Strategies Based on Law No. 17 of 2023 Suwisman, Suwisman; Harahap, Irawan; Oktapani, Silm
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 17 No 2 (2025): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.12339

Abstract

Ideally, the sale of prescription-only medicines should be strictly regulated by requiring a doctor’s prescription to ensure patient safety and prevent drug misuse. However, the reality in Dumai City shows that the sale of prescription-only medicines without prescriptions remains prevalent, reflecting weak supervisory functions and low legal awareness within society. This study aims to analyze the implementation of supervision over the sale of prescription-only medicines in Dumai City from a normative perspective based on Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, while also identifying the factors influencing weak supervision and formulating effective preventive strategies. This article falls under the category of sociological legal research with a qualitative approach. The research method applied is empirical legal study, combining statutory analysis with field data obtained through observations and interviews with pharmacists, BPOM (Food and Drug Supervisory Agency), and the community. The findings conclude that weak supervision is caused by limited supervisory resources, low legal awareness, and lack of inter-agency coordination. Therefore, the necessary preventive strategies include strengthening the role of pharmacists, optimizing the functions of supervisory institutions, increasing community participation, and ensuring consistent law enforcement to achieve public health protection.
IMPLEMENTASI BIMBINGAN KEAGAMAAN BAGI NARAPIDANA BERAGAMA ALIRAN KEPERCAYAAN TRIDHARMA Manulang, Johanes Gabe Saputra; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Harahap, Irawan
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i1.1263

Abstract

The observance of religious practices for inmates adhering to the Tridharma faith in Bagansiapiapi City based on Law No. 6 of 2013 has not been properly implemented, as the facilities for religious practices of other faiths are not equal to those already existing. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of religious guidance for inmates adhering to the Tridharma faith in Bagansiapiapi City based on Government Regulation Number 32 of 1999 on terms and procedures for the implementation of the rights of correctional inmates, and to analyze the obstacles and efforts to overcome these obstacles in the implementation of religious guidance for inmates adhering to the Tridharma faith in Bagansiapiapi City. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research results, it is known that the implementation of religious guidance for inmates adhering to the Tridharma faith in Bagansiapiapi City has not been fully realized, as some inmates have not fully received the necessary religious guidance. This results in some inmates not receiving the spiritual support they need. Government Regulation Number 32 of 1999 on terms and procedures for the implementation of the rights of correctional inmates emphasizes the importance of fulfilling the rights of inmates, including the right to receive religious guidance.
PENYELESAIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS Kadri; Fahmi; Harahap, Irawan
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1384

Abstract

Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation, specifically Article 310 paragraph (4), states that accidents causing the death of a person due to the negligence of the perpetrator can result in criminal sanctions. This article specifies that anyone who, due to their negligence, causes a traffic accident that results in the death of another person can be sentenced to a maximum of 6 (six) years in prison and/or a fine of up to IDR 12,000,000.00 (twelve million rupiah). The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research findings, it is known that the rights of the perpetrator and the victim in a traffic accident include that the perpetrator has the right to be treated in accordance with applicable legal principles, including the right to legal defense, the right to fair treatment in legal proceedings, and the right to amend their wrongdoing through rehabilitation or mediation if necessary. On the other hand, the victim of a traffic accident also has the right to compensation for the losses they have suffered, including medical expenses, property damage, and other losses. These rights must be guaranteed and fulfilled with full responsibility by the parties involved, whether the perpetrator, law enforcement officials, or other relevant parties. Legal resolution of traffic accident perpetrators based on Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation in the jurisdiction of Polresta Pekanbaru indicates that this law provides a clear framework regarding the procedures for law enforcement against traffic accident perpetrators. The law emphasizes that perpetrators who violate traffic regulations and cause accidents must be held accountable for their actions. The legal process is expected not only to focus on imposing sanctions but also to provide space for the perpetrators to correct their mistakes through appropriate mechanisms, such as fines, imprisonment, or administrative sanctions.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGENDARA KENDARAAN BERMOTOR ANAK Susanti, Susi; Fahmi; Harahap, Irawan
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1385

Abstract

Traffic law enforcement is one of the important components in maintaining safety and order on the road. In Indonesia, traffic regulations are governed by Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation (UU LLAJ). This phenomenon not only endangers the safety of the children riders themselves but also other road users. Law No. 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation provides a legal basis to regulate this phenomenon to create order, security, and safety in traffic. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research findings, it is known that the regulation on the ownership of a driver's license (SIM) for child motor vehicle riders is regulated in Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation. The requirement for someone to have a driver's license is to be 17 (seventeen) years old for SIM A, C, and D, while 20 years old for SIM B1, and 21 years old for SIM B II. The regulation regarding the ownership of a driver's license (SIM) for child motor vehicle riders is an important preventive measure to ensure safety on the road. Law enforcement against child motor vehicle riders in the jurisdiction of Polresta Pekanbaru is still faced with the issue of motor vehicles being ridden by children, which could trigger traffic accidents. Efforts to address this have been implemented through various measures, including traffic raids and vehicle administrative checks.
PENYELESAIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA UJARAN KEBENCIAN DARI PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG ITE, UNDANG-UNDANG HAM, DAN UNDANG-UNDANG KEBEBASAN MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DI MUKA UMUM Hutagaol, Hendra DM; Fahmi; Harahap, Irawan
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1434

Abstract

Aturan hukum yang harus dikedepankan, peneliti harus mempertimbangkan konteks hukum yang paling relevan dengan esensi ujaran kebencian. Undang-Undang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik cenderung digunakan dalam kasus ini karena secara spesifik mengatur ujaran kebencian di ruang digital, yang sering menjadi medium utama untuk penyebaran ujaran kebencian di era modern. Pasal-pasal dalam Undang-Undang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik, seperti Pasal 28 ayat (2), mengatur larangan menyebarkan informasi yang menimbulkan kebencian atau permusuhan berbasis SARA. Namun, Undang-undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia memberikan kerangka yang lebih luas, yakni memastikan bahwa hak atas kebebasan berekspresi tetap dijaga, selama tidak melanggar hak orang lain. Sementara itu, Undang-undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum memberikan jaminan terhadap ekspresi di ruang publik, dengan beberapa pembatasan demi menjaga ketertiban umum. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum sosiologis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Pengaturan hukum Sanksi terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ujaran kebencian ditinjau dari perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, Dan Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum bahwa g-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, memberikan landasan hukum bagi penindakan ujaran kebencian yang disampaikan melalui media elektronik. Pasal 28 ayat (2) g-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, melarang tindakan penyebaran informasi yang menimbulkan kebencian atau permusuhan berdasarkan suku, agama, ras, dan antar-golongan (SARA). Pelanggaran ini dapat dikenai sanksi pidana berupa hukuman penjara maksimal 6 tahun dan/atau denda maksimal Rp1 miliar. Ketentuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah berupaya memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi masyarakat dari dampak negatif penyebaran ujaran kebencian di dunia maya. Di sisi lain, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia memberikan perspektif bahwa setiap individu memiliki hak untuk tidak didiskriminasi dan untuk hidup damai tanpa adanya ancaman. Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia menegaskan pentingnya penghormatan terhadap martabat manusia, yang menjadi landasan perlindungan terhadap korban ujaran kebencian. Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia mengimbau agar penegakan hukum dilakukan dengan tetap menghormati hak asasi manusia, termasuk hak terdakwa untuk diperlakukan secara adil. Sementara itu, Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum memberikan jaminan konstitusional terhadap kebebasan berekspresi. Namun, kebebasan ini tidak bersifat absolut, karena Pasal 6 Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum tersebut mengatur bahwa hak menyampaikan pendapat harus dilaksanakan dengan memperhatikan hak asasi manusia orang lain, moral, dan ketertiban umum. Dengan demikian, ujaran kebencian yang melanggar batas ini tidak dapat dibenarkan. Penyelesaian Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, Dan Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum bahwa penyelesaian hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ujaran kebencian mengacu pada asas keadilan, efektivitas, dan penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia. Dalam praktiknya, pendekatan ini melibatkan beberapa mekanisme, termasuk langkah preventif, mediasi, hingga proses hukum formal. Langkah preventif dapat dilakukan melalui edukasi masyarakat terkait dampak ujaran kebencian serta peningkatan literasi digital untuk mencegah penyebaran konten yang melanggar hukum. Pendekatan ini bertujuan menciptakan kesadaran kolektif bahwa ujaran kebencian dapat merusak harmoni sosial. Ketika ujaran kebencian telah terjadi, mekanisme mediasi dapat menjadi alternatif penyelesaian untuk menghindari eskalasi konflik. Mediasi ini, jika memungkinkan, dapat menyelesaikan masalah tanpa harus melalui proses peradilan. Namun, untuk kasus-kasus dengan dampak serius atau melibatkan kepentingan publik, proses hukum formal menjadi langkah yang tidak dapat dihindari. Dalam proses hukum formal, aparat penegak hukum diharapkan menerapkan ketentuan UU ITE dengan tetap memperhatikan prinsip keadilan. Selain itu, penting untuk memastikan bahwa korban mendapatkan perlindungan yang memadai, baik secara fisik maupun psikologis, selama proses hukum berlangsung.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELUDUPAN MANUSIA DARI DAN LUAR INDONESIA Saputra, Dodi Ripo; Harahap, Irawan; Triana, Yeni
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1448

Abstract

Immigration in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 6 of 2011 on Immigration, which replaced the previous immigration law, Law Number 9 of 1992. The law states that anyone who enters or exits Indonesia without undergoing immigration inspection, or without valid travel documents or visas, will be subject to criminal sanctions. The legal foundation for human trafficking offenses is also outlined in Law Number 18 of 2017 on the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers. Immigration matters are closely related to the movement of people across international borders, which has increased in the era of globalization and free trade, and has now become a concern for countries around the world, including Indonesia. Smuggling, which involves trafficking people for exploitation or physical and psychological abuse, is a violation of human dignity. The method used in this research is sociological legal research. Based on the results, it is known that law enforcement at the Bengkalis Immigration Checkpoint Office (TPI) is in accordance with the provisions set out in the Immigration Law. However, challenges remain, such as limited human resources, inadequate infrastructure, and suboptimal coordination between agencies. Handling human trafficking requires active involvement from various parties, including the police, customs, and other related agencies, to strengthen oversight and prevent this transnational crime. This research concludes that to improve the effectiveness of law enforcement, there needs to be enhanced training for officers, improvement of inspection facilities and infrastructure, and strengthened cooperation between agencies involved in the prevention and prosecution of human trafficking. Additionally, a broader socialization to the public regarding the dangers and impacts of human trafficking should also be conducted to strengthen preventive efforts.
IMPLEMENTASI PENYITAAN TERHADAP ASET PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRES INDRAGIRI HILIR Alfarisi , Salman; Afrita, Indra; Harahap, Irawan
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 10 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v10i1.8487

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan danPemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang merupakan peraturan terbaru. undang-undang ini ditemukan penggunaan pendekatan-pendekatan danasas-asas dalam hukum pidana yang penerapan kurang sesuai . Selain ketidaksamaan antara pemberian wewenang institusi dalam penanganan tindak pidana pencucianuang.Permasalahan yang diangkat Bagaimana Implementasi penyitaan terhadap seluruh aset pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang berdasarkan,Apa saja Hambatan yang dihadapi aparat penegak hukum dalam pelaksanaan penyitaan aset Adapun Objek Penelitian Untuk Mengkaji dan mengetahui Bagaimana bentuk pengaturan Hukum terhadap Tindak pidana Pencucian Uang di Indonesia. dan juga Untuk mengetahui bagaimana bentuk implementasi hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencucian uang tersebut.Berdasarkan peneletian ini Dengan adanya Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang merupakan peraturan terbaru. undang-undang ini ditemukan penggunaan pendekatan-pendekatan danasas-asas dalam hukum pidana yang penerapan sesuai . pemberian wewenang institusi dalam penanganan tindak pidana pencucian uang.Saran yang dapat diberikan dalam penelitian ini adalah:Dalam mengoptimalisasi penyidikan TPPU perlu penambahan personil penyidik yang memiliki kualifikasi penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di setiap lembaga/instansi.Bagi aparat penegak hukum, sebagai sumbangan pemikiran dalam upaya penegakan hukum nya Kata kunci: Penyitaan Aset Pelaku, Tindak pidana pencucian uang, Penyidik.
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM SURAT TELEGRAM KABARESKRIM KEPOLISIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA TENTANG PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA MENGENYAMPINGKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Tampubolon, Subiarto Aprido; Harahap, Irawan; Kadaryanto, Bagio
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1347

Abstract

The policy of returning state losses to drop criminal proceedings that have the potential to weaken law enforcement, damage legal certainty, create moral hazard, and be unfair to the wider community. Returning state losses is important, but the criminal law process against perpetrators of corruption must continue to maintain the principle of justice, ensure a deterrent effect, and maintain the integrity of law in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the legal position of the telegram from the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Republic of Indonesia Police regarding the return of state financial losses ignoring criminal acts of corruption in the perspective of legal certainty is that the return of state financial losses that ignore criminal acts of corruption should be reviewed so as not to conflict with the principle of legal certainty. Efforts to return state losses are indeed important, but they must not eliminate criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption. Enforcement of corruption law must be carried out firmly to provide a deterrent effect and ensure the achievement of the expected justice in the legal system. Legal certainty is an important key in maintaining the integrity of law enforcement, especially in corruption cases that harm the public interest. The legal consequences of the telegram from the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Republic of Indonesia Police regarding the return of state financial losses by ignoring corruption in the perspective of legal certainty are the legal consequences of the Telegram Letter from the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit which regulates the return of state losses by ignoring corruption in the perspective of legal certainty, creating several serious impacts on the legal system in Indonesia. This policy weakens the principle of legal certainty, reduces the deterrent effect, and damages the integrity of the function of criminal law in the context of corruption. In order to maintain public trust and ensure substantive justice, it is important for this policy to be reviewed so that it remains in line with the basic principles of law enforcement, especially in eradicating corruption that is detrimental to the state and society.