Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.757
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Buletin Udayana Mengabdi JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Unram Law Review Jurnal Akta Jurnal Health Sains Journal of Social Research Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST) Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Pemuliaan Keadilan Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum
Ni Nengah Adiyaryani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Fundamental of Law Enforcement Authority in Marince Accidents with the Police in Indonesian Waters Ni Made Rai Sukardi; I Wayan Parsa; Ni Nengah Adiyaryani; Sagung Putri M.E.Purwani
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v3i6.9689

Abstract

The sea is the boundary between a country and another country which is determined through extradition. On December 13, 1957 the government issued a statement known as the Djuanda Declaration with the intention of uniting the fragmented land areas so that the declaration would close the existence of the open sea between mainland islands by covering the problem of the ideal concept of regulating the authority to enforce maritime accident laws in indonesian territorial waters. The approach method in this research is normative juridical based on an analysis of the law. Then it is described in a descriptive-analytical description. The problem is investigated by describing/describing the condition of the subject/object of research, finding facts thoroughly, and systematically reviewing national regulations. Conclusion maritime law enforcement can cause potential friction between one institution and another. For this reason, this research provides a concept that maritime security and law enforcement institutions will be productive and effective-efficient if they are in accordance with Pancasila.
The Legal Power of the Constitutional Court Decisions Remains Suandika, I Nyoman; Usfunan, Yohanes; Palguna, I Dewa Gede; Adiyaryani, Ni Nengah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i12.1606

Abstract

Issues relating to granting permanent legal force to decisions of the constitutional court immediately after they are pronounced in a plenary session open to the public are important to research for several reasons Firstly, it is very important for us to know the rationale for granting permanent legal force to decisions of the constitutional court given immediately after completion. pronounced in a public meeting open to the public. Second, understanding the permanent legal force of constitutional court decisions is also related to the question of why it is not possible to have legal efforts to correct constitutional court decisions if errors occur in terms of achieving legal certainty. Based on this, the question also arises as to whether the constitutional court's decision regarding this error will continue or not. Third, it is related to whether the legislator (positive legislator) can override the decision of the constitutional court. What is the rationale underlying the granting of permanent legal force to a Constitutional Court decision from the moment it is pronounced in a session open to the public? This research is normative legal research because there is a legal vacuum if the constitutional court's decision is contrary to the spirit of the 1945 Constitution. The importance of immediacy in granting permanent character to the constitutional court's decision, if viewed from the law in book aspect, is indeed the best choice. This is based on the following reasons. First, the Constitutional Court was formed to protect the purity of the Constitution with a more detailed interpretation. This interpretation will be used as a basis for resolving problems by certain authorities who are given direct authority by the Constitution. Therefore, it is appropriate that the interpretation is only carried out once, which is binding so that the decision must be placed at the first and final level where no effort can be made to cancel it. Second, apart from that, it must also be understood that the constitutional court as a constitutional court can resolve problems and provide legal certainty quickly by the principles of fast and simple justice.
BATASAN ASAS DOMINUS LITIS JAKSA DIKAITKAN DENGAN ASAS DIFERENSIASI FUNGSIONAL DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA I Dewa Gede Agung Dwi Cahyadhi; Ni Nengah Adiyaryani
Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia saat ini, asas dominus litis menempatkan Jaksa sebagai pengendali utama proses penuntutan, namun kewenangan ini sering kali bersinggungan dengan asas diferensiasi fungsional yang menuntut pembagian peran yang tegas antara Penyidik, penuntut umum, dan Hakim, sehingga penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara khusus bagaimana kewenangan yuridis Jaksa dalam menerapkan asas dominus litis, serta bagaimana batas kewenangan tersebut ketika dikaitkan dengan prinsip diferensiasi fungsional dalam sistem hukum acara pidana di Indonesia saat ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual  serta analisis terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa meskipun dominus litis diakui dalam praktik dan diperkuat melalui undang-undang serta kebijakan internal Kejaksaan, belum terdapat pengaturan yuridis yang tegas mengenai batasan fungsionalnya terhadap institusi lain dalam KUHAP saat ini, yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan tumpang tindih kewenangan, ketegangan antar lembaga penegak hukum, dan berpotensi melemahkan prinsip checks and balances, serta menimbulkan conflict of interest, sehingga diperlukan pembaruan hukum melalui revisi KUHAP atau peraturan antar lembaga guna menciptakan koordinasi horizontal yang akuntabel dan menjamin efektivitas sistem peradilan pidana yang adil. Kata Kunci : Pengendali Perkara. Diferensiasi Fungsional, Sistem Peradilan Pidana.   ABSTRACT In the current criminal justice system in Indonesia, the dominus litis principle places the prosecutor as the main controller of the prosecution process, but this authority often intersects with the principle of functional differentiation which demands a clear division of roles between investigators, prosecutors and judges, so this research aims to specifically examine how the juridical authority of the prosecutor in applying the dominus litis principle, as well as how the limits of this authority when associated with the principle of functional differentiation in the current criminal procedure law system in Indonesia. This research uses normative legal research methods through statutory and conceptual approaches and analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study found that although dominus litis is recognized in practice and strengthened through laws and internal policies of the prosecutor's office, there is no firm juridical regulation regarding its functional limits to other institutions in the current KUHAP, which ultimately leads to overlapping authority, tensions between law enforcement agencies, and has the potential to weaken the principle of checks and balances, as well as causing conflicts of interest, so that legal reform is needed through revision of the KUHAP or inter-agency regulations to create accountable horizontal coordination and ensure the effectiveness of a fair criminal justice system. Key Words: Dominus litis. Functional Differentiation, Criminal Justice System.
Co-Authors A.A. N.Y. Darmadi Adia Pratistia Aditya, I Gede Prama Ayu Diah Pradnya Swari P.J Banu, Ida Wayan Bagus Abby Dewi, Kadek Sri Wahyuni Etik Jamsianah Gomes, Florindo Cardoso I Dewa Gede Agung Dwi Cahyadhi I Dewa Gede Dana Sugama I Dewa Gede Palguna I Dewa Made Suartha I Gde Satya Adhi Wicaksana I Gede Artha I Gusti Agus Yuda Trisna Pramana I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika, I Gusti Ayu I Ketut Sudjana I Made Aryawan Saddewa I Made Dwikka Surya Pratama I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra I Wayan Bela Siki Layang I Wayan Parsa I Wayan Topik Widnyana K. A. Sudiarawan Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Tegar Wacika Komang Ayu Trisna Cahya Dewi Lusiana Bida Made Wipra Pratistita Mulia, Moto Ni Ketut Ayu Suwandewi Ni Ketut Ngetis Megi Megayani Ni Luh Ayu Widhiarcani Laksmidewi Ni Luh Diah Febriyani Teja Santi Ni Made Diah Arista Ardiyantini Ni Made Rai Sukardi Ni Putu Inten Puspitasari Nyoman Arif Budiman Nyoman Trisna Sari Indra Pratiwi Putu Ria Purnami Sagung Putri M. E. Purwani Sagung Putri M.E.Purwani Saraswastini, Luh Putu Henny Suandika, I Nyoman Tyas Yuniawati Suroto Wulandani, Made Yussyta Yohanes Usfunan