Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

Penerapan Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan Damanhury, Ardhy; Candra, Mardi; Sagala, Rotua Valentina
Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): SAINMIKUM : Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum, Februari 202
Publisher : Lumbung Pare Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60126/sainmikum.v2i1.825

Abstract

Penerapan metode Omnibus Law dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan bertujuan untuk menyederhanakan regulasi yang tumpang tindih dan meningkatkan efisiensi hukum di sektor kesehatan. Penelitian ini mengangkat dua permasalahan yakni Bagaimana Bentuk Penyederhanaan Regulasi Melalui Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan? Dan Bagaimana Konsep Penyederhanaan Regulasi Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Masa Mendatang? Dengan menggunakan Teori Negara Hukum dan Teori Perundang-undangan. Metode penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian Yuridis-normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan analitis yang diambil dari sumber bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Sedang Teknik Pengumpulan bahan-bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara mengidentifikasi dan menginventarisasi aturan hukum positif dengan Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini Penafsiran gramatikal dan sistematis. Hasil Penelitian ini bahwa dalam Penerapan Metode Omnibus Law sebagai Penyederhanaan Regulasi, Metode Omnibus Law dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan merupakan perwujudan dari konsep penyederhanaan regulasi yang sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. Metode ini memungkinkan penyusunan peraturan dengan menggabungkan, mengubah, atau mencabut beberapa regulasi dalam satu undang-undang guna menciptakan sistem hukum yang lebih terpadu dan efisien dan dalam Asas Legalitas dan Implikasi dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Penggunaan Omnibus Law dalam UU Kesehatan telah memenuhi asas legalitas yang menjadi dasar penyelenggaraan administrasi pemerintahan. Namun, penerapannya lebih umum di negara dengan sistem Common Law, sedangkan Indonesia yang menganut Civil Law lebih dikenal dengan kodifikasi dan unifikasi hukum. Oleh karena itu, Omnibus Law dapat berfungsi sebagai Undang-Undang Payung (Umbrella Act) untuk menciptakan keselarasan hukum dan mencegah tumpang tindih regulasi.
Telemedicine Regulation in Indonesia: Legal Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions Mutiah, Fifi; Sibuea, Hotma; Candra, Mardi
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jmi.v4i4.2267

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has positioned telemedicine as a transformative solution to address healthcare disparities, particularly in geographically fragmented regions like Indonesia. Despite its potential, telemedicine adoption in Indonesia faces significant challenges, including regulatory ambiguities, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data security and professional accountability. While recent legal frameworks, such as Law No. 17 of 2023 and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, aim to address these issues, their implementation remains inconsistent, risking patient safety and trust. This study fills critical gaps in existing literature by integrating the rule of law and health justice frameworks to evaluate Indonesia’s telemedicine regulations—a novel approach absent in prior works. The study addresses two key research questions: (1) How does Indonesia’s current legal framework regulate telemedicine, and what gaps exist in practice? (2) How can telemedicine regulations align with the principles of a legal state (Rechtsstaat) to ensure accountability and equity? Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research combines legislative analysis, conceptual evaluation, and case studies, including the Dr. Damar case (2021), to assess regulatory coherence. Findings reveal significant gaps, including unclear liability standards for misdiagnoses, weak enforcement of data privacy laws, and disparities in rural telemedicine access. The study highlights misalignments with international standards like the GDPR and HIPAA, particularly in AI governance and cross-border data flows. To address these issues, the study recommends: (1) strengthening operational standards by adopting WHO guidelines and mandating AI validation; (2) clarifying liability frameworks to define malpractice accountability; and (3) bridging the digital divide through subsidized internet and device programs.
Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mekanisme Hubungan antar Lembaga Negara Arifien, Bustanul; Maulana, Hedwig A.; Candra, Mardi
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Juli 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i7.1563

Abstract

The Constitutional Court was established following the reform era as part of the judiciary, playing a significant role in strengthening the constitutional system of Indonesia. Pursuant to Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court is vested with the authority to conduct judicial review of statutes to ensure their conformity with the Constitution. As the *guardian of the Constitution*, the Court is responsible for ensuring that all laws and state policies remain consistent with the fundamental principles of the 1945 Constitution and for maintaining the balance of power through the system of *checks and balances*. The theoretical framework used in this research is the theory of the rule of law and the theory of separation of powers. The type of research employed by the author is normative juridical research. The author adopts three approaches, namely the comparative approach, the statutory approach, and the conceptual approach. Legal sources collected consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, all obtained through literature study and analyzed using a deductive-analytical approach. The research findings indicate that the Constitutional Court's position within the Indonesian constitutional system after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution holds a strategic role in maintaining the balance of power among state institutions, particularly through its authority to resolve constitutional authority disputes. Prior to the amendments, there was no legitimate judicial mechanism available to settle conflicts between state institutions, which often led to institutional tension. The establishment of the Constitutional Court filled this legal vacuum and reinforced the principle of constitutional supremacy, although its authority remains limited by Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, which does not yet encompass independent state institutions established by statutory law. In response to the challenges of modern constitutional practice, various proposals have emerged suggesting that the Constitutional Court should be granted broader and more explicit authority, either through interpretation of the Law on Judicial Power or through a limited constitutional amendment. Overall, the Constitutional Court represents a significant corrective measure to the past dominance of executive power and serves as a fundamental pillar in upholding democracy, the rule of law, and a sound and functional system of checks and balances.
Kedudukan Material Transfer Agreement sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hukum dalam Menjamin Pengalihan Material Kesehatan Eka Sakti Panca Indraningsih; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Mardi Candra
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5869

Abstract

The use of materials in health research requires a binding instrument to regulate the distribution of benefits. Material Transfer Agreement (MTA) is an essential material transfer agreement, allowing the management of the transfer through negotiation until a mutually beneficial agreement is reached. In addition, MTA functions as a contract that protects the rights of the parties involved and ensures compliance with regulations, based on the theory of legal protection and authority. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The collection of legal materials is carried out through the identification of positive legal rules, as well as examining primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The data is then analyzed from the identification of legal facts to drawing conclusions. The results of the study show that MTA regulations in Indonesia are comprehensively regulated by various levels, including Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health (Article 340 paragraph 3), Law Number 11 of 2019 (Article 76 letter h and Article 77 paragraph 1), Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024 (Articles 972, 1025–1031), and Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 85 of 2020 (Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, and 16 paragraph 1). These national legal frameworks complement each other to ensure procedural certainty, biosafety, benefit sharing, protection of intellectual property rights, and sanctions for violators in the transfer of health materials. Although its implementation faces preventive and repressive challenges, MTA has proven essential in bridging national and commercial interests, increasing the capacity of science and technology, and protecting the sovereignty of Indonesia's genetic resources.
Analisis Yuridis Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara (BMN) pada Tanah Perkeretaapian dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Hartanto, Gunawan; Mau, Hedwig Adianto; Candra, Mardi
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1499

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan dan kepastian hukum pemanfaatan BMN berupa tanah perkeretaapian dalam rangka optimalisasi aset negara. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Data primer diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan, seperti UUD 1945, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2007, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2020, sedangkan data sekunder berasal dari literatur, jurnal, dan pendapat ahli. Analisis dilakukan secara deduktif untuk menilai kesesuaian norma dengan praktik di lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tanah RUMIJA dan RUMAJA telah diatur sebagai BMN dan kewenangan pengelolaannya berada pada Direktorat Jenderal Perkeretaapian (DJKA) Kementerian Perhubungan. Namun, masih terdapat aset yang bersertifikat atas nama PT Kereta Api Indonesia, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan masalah hukum dan kerugian negara. Penelitian merekomendasikan pembatalan sertifikat tersebut dan penggantian dengan sertifikat atas nama Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Temuan ini memberikan implikasi praktis bagi pembuat kebijakan dan instansi terkait dalam merumuskan strategi pengelolaan aset negara yang lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan berorientasi pada kepentingan publik.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI PASCA PERUBAHAN STATUS MENJADI APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA THE LEGAL Wijonarko, Reqi Endar; Mau, Hedwiq Adianto; Candra, Mardi
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1737

Abstract

The revision of the KPK Law caused another polemic, where Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/2017 interpreted in essence that the independence and freedom of the KPK from the influence of any power is in carrying out its duties and authorities, which may not be based on the influence or pressure of any party. But the lawmakers instead narrowed the scope of KPK employees by changing the status of KPK employees to Civil Servants (ASN). This is because as ASN employees, KPK employees must also comply with Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning Civil Servants, where the President as the holder of government power is the highest authority in the policy, professional development, and management of ASN. The problem formulation in this thesis is: What is the form of the authority of KPK investigators after the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019? What is the legal certainty regarding the independence of the authority of KPK investigators after the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019?. The research method in this thesis consists of: This type of research is normative legal research, which is a legal research approach that focuses on the study of applicable positive legal norms. This method is carried out by examining various relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrines, legal principles, and court decisions, in order to understand how the law should be applied in resolving a problem. The results of this thesis research are: 1) That the authority of KPK investigators as well as the legal certainty and independence of the KPK after the Amendments to Law Number 19 of 2019 have fundamentally shifted the paradigm of legal certainty and the independence of the authority of KPK investigators. If previously legal certainty was based on the principle of lex specialis which gave extraordinary authority and full autonomy, then after the 2019 Law, that legal certainty is no longer absolute, but is bound by a more complex bureaucratic and supervisory framework. The change in the status of investigators to Civil Servants (ASN) theoretically places the KPK in the executive power hierarchy system, which has the potential to harm the principles of institutional and functional independence. Authority that was once guaranteed by internal autonomy is now faced with the potential for intervention and conflicts of interest inherent in the state civil servant structure. Meanwhile, the licensing mechanism by the Supervisory Board (Dewas) reduces procedural legal certainty in terms of the speed and secrecy of the investigation. This is contrary to the essence of law enforcement against extraordinary crimes such as corruption, which demands swift action without bureaucratic obstacles. That the legal certainty regarding the independence of the authority of KPK investigators after the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019, if previously the KPK functioned as an independent institution with extraordinary authority that could not be intervened, now its legal certainty is no longer absolute. This change creates legal uncertainty and the potential for weakening through the granting of authority to issue SP3 (Warrant for Termination of Investigation) which has the potential to erode the principle of "zero tolerance" against corruption and open up opportunities for intervention in major cases. The formation of the Supervisory Board creates ambiguity of roles and overlapping authority, which has the potential to hinder the investigation process and institutional effectiveness. And the change in the status of KPK employees to Civil Servants (ASN) directly threatens personal independence and creates dependence on the government's bureaucratic structure. Even though the change in the law may aim for synergy and accountability, in practice it has theoretically weakened the KPK's independence and created legal uncertainty that could threaten the effectiveness of corruption eradication
MEMAHAMI LEGALITAS REMIX & PARODI DI SOSIAL MEDIA; MENGKAJI AMBIGUITAS UU HAK CIPTA TERHADAP KONTEN BERBASIS KEBEBASAN BERKARYA Salsabila, Aulia; Franciska, Wira; Candra, Mardi
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1747

Abstract

The evolution of digital culture has fostered the emergence of transformational content—such as remixes and parodies—as legitimate forms of creative expression. However, Indonesia’s copyright framework, particularly Article 44 of Law No. 28 of 2014, remains normatively ambiguous and fails to ensure legal certainty for such expressions. Employing a normative legal approach, this study identifies a structural tension between the protection of exclusive rights and freedom of expression, exacerbated by formalistic state enforcement and algorithmic content moderation by digital platforms that lack contextual assessment. This research recommends a reformulation of the “fairness” clause grounded in the fair use doctrine, along with the development of adjudicative mechanisms that safeguard substantive digital justice.
Effectiveness of Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts Through Mediation by Non-Judge Mediators Within Banten Majid, Saiful; Al Hasan, Fahadil Amin; Candra, Mardi; Saleh, Arief Isdiman
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.251-274

Abstract

Mediation is a method of resolving disputes through a negotiation process with the assistance of either a judge or a non-judge mediator. The Supreme Court of Indonesia set a nationwide aim of 25% for settling disputes by mediation in 2023. However, the actual implementation in the jurisdiction of the Banten Religious High Court is only around 20,7% of the defined target, below the national success rate for religious courts, which has reached 39.85%. One of the main factors is the over-reliance on non-judge mediators and the mediator's ability to lead the mediation. Thus, mediation management must be improved, and the capacity of mediators, particularly non-judges, must be increased. This study seeks to discuss the effectiveness of dispute resolution by non-judge mediators and how to maximize the level of success in settling disputes by non-judge mediators. This article is a descriptive qualitative study using normative juridical and empirical approaches. According to the findings of this study, the mediation process in religious court institutions, particularly in the jurisdiction of the Banten Religious High Court, has not been effective because most of the process is directed by non-judge mediators who are less qualified than judge mediators. To increase the success rate of the mediation implementation process, the court must take the following steps: Rewarding non-judge mediators, organizing coaching and training programs for non-judge mediators, determining national mediation settlement targets by involving non-judge mediators, implementing hybrid mediation (between judge mediators and non-judge mediators); and conducting regular evaluations of a non-judge mediator.
Kewenangan Kemendagri Dan Kemenkuham Dalam Pengharmonisasian Raperda Nugrahani, Ellen Lutya Putri; Mau, Hedwig Adianto; Candra, Mardi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 17, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v17i2.266

Abstract

The number of local regulations that are not harmonious with higher laws and regulations, poor public interest, decency and even human rights has attracted the attention of many parties. One of them is related to the role of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kanwil Kemenkumham) in the process of harmonizing draft regional regulations (raperda). The existence of Article 58 Paragraph (2) of Law No.15 of 2019 is expected to bring positive changes considering that every draft regulation must be harmonized through the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights before being facilitated by the Provincial Government Legal Bureau. The results showed that the implementation of Raperda harmonization by the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights is still not optimal. This is due to various obstacles, including the existence of the Circular Letter of the Director General of Legislation is considered not to be a strong basis as an implementing regulation for harmonization by the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Another problem is the conflict of harmonization authority between the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Ministry of Home Affairs (Kemendagri).  To overcome these obstacles, it is necessary to submit recommendations addressed to the Director General of Legislation to make an agreement with the Director General of Regional Autonomy of the Ministry of Home Affairs, to prepare a Joint Decree (SKB) between the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Minister of Home Affairs related to the Harmonization of Regional Draft Regulations. In addition, the Director General of Laws and Regulations of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights should immediately make implementing regulations through Amendments to Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 87 of 2014 concerning Implementation Regulations of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations. The amendment to the Presidential Regulation is adjusted to the contents of Article 58 Paragraph (2) of Law No.15 of 2019.
KONSTITUSIONALITAS PERUBAHAN USIA CALON PRESIDEN DAN CALON WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM NEGARA HUKUM DEMOKRASI. Adji, Agung Bayu; Mau, Hedwig Adianto; Candra, Mardi
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Januari 2024
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v3i1.2116

Abstract

As a state of law, Indonesia's system of government is based on the principle of the constitution. As a consequence, democracy has become a system that is implemented through the holding of general elections for president and vice president. The change in the age limit of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7/2017 has undergone changes in accordance with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XX 11/2023 which has caused controversy from various parties, namely the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XX 11/2023 has the potential to violate the principles in the exercise of judicial power, has a major impact on the good name of the Constitutional Court and Indonesian law, and there are a number of irregularities in several decisions of the Constitutional Court that test the constitutionality of Article 169 letter q. This research uses a normative juridical method. The research method in this study is the normative juridical method. The type of data used by the author is secondary data with primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques in the form of documents or library materials on secondary legal data. The data analysis method in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results showed that the age limit for presidential and vice presidential candidates is regulated in Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7/2017 on General Elections. The series of legal rules for the election of the president and vice president in accordance with the mandate of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 22E are set out in several amendments to the rules, namely Law Number 23 of 2003, the second amendment is contained in Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning General Elections of the President and Vice President and finally amended into Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The implications of changes in the age of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in a democratic legal state as outlined in Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 are essentially adding norms that should not be in accordance with the initial principles of the Constitutional Court (testing the constitutionality of existing norms), the Constitutional Court's decision cannot be separated from the political context, the Constitutional Court's decision was not taken unanimously because there were differences of opinion among the panel of judges, and there were several striking anomalies, especially in the considerations presented in the dissenting opinion and concurring opinion