Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.21
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal of Governance and Policy Innovation (JGPI) Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Hukum Indonesia JURNAL RETENTUM Legalis : Journal of Law Review Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae
Sara, Rineke
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL RETENTUM

 1 
Reformasi Hukum Mengenai Penguatan Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Oleh Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha Sara, Rineke; Pratama Sarwono, Aditya; Nandang, Asep; Samuel Wuisan, Ronald
JURNAL RETENTUM Vol 5 No 2 (2023): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Pascasarjana UDA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/retentum.v7i1.5390

Abstract

This study discusses the obstacles faced by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in enforcing competition law, with a focus on the difficulty in obtaining adequate evidence, the lack of authority to force related parties, and the unclear procedures that can harm the reporter and the reported. The research method used is a normative legal approach with an analysis of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The main findings show that the KPPU faces serious obstacles in enforcing the law due to the lack of direct execution authority, non-transparent procedures, and the lack of legal protection for reporters. This study recommends several steps, including synchronizing Law No. 5 of 1999 with civil procedural law, granting direct execution authority to the KPPU, adding more stringent and effective sanctions, and increasing coordination between law enforcement agencies to accelerate the implementation of decisions and create a healthier and fairer business competition system.
Pembaharuan Hukum Perlindungan Jurnalistik Dalam Rangka Kebebasan Pers Berdasarkan Nilai Keadilan Sara, Rineke; Lineker, Tyson; Daton, Febianus Seran; Batubara, Muhamad Iqbal Zein
JURNAL RETENTUM Vol 5 No 2 (2023): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Pascasarjana UDA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/retentum.v7i1.5388

Abstract

Freedom of the press as a pillar of democracy often faces threats from regulations that are open to multiple interpretations, such as articles in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) that can be used to criminalize journalists and limit the public's right to information. This study aims to reconstruct ideal regulations based on the value of justice by placing press freedom as the main priority, as well as guaranteeing the public's right to obtain correct and transparent information. The study uses a normative legal method with a legislative and conceptual approach to evaluate the weaknesses of existing regulations, especially the ITE Law and the Press Law, and to provide concrete recommendations. The results of the study underline the importance of revising the multi-interpretable articles in the ITE Law, strengthening the Press Law as a legal umbrella for press freedom, and developing a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism to protect journalists from legal or physical intimidation. The main conclusion shows that collaboration between the government, supervisory institutions, and the community is needed to ensure a safe environment for journalists, so that press freedom can be realized optimally as the main link between the public and information.
Co-Authors Alfiani, Francisca Romana Nanik Amrizal Amrizal Ariansyah, Ruli Barthos, Megawati Batubara, Muhamad Iqbal Zein Daton, Febianus Seran Defry Yusdanial, Raden Ferdiandra Diatmika, Komang Trisna Dwi Prakoso, Agung Effendi, Lutfi Erikha, Annisa Fani, Veranika Santiani Hutagalung, Tiur Hasmida K., Andriansyah Tiawarman Kune, Medeleine Antoneta Lorohama Kurniawan, Dicki Agri Lineker, Tyson Mulya, Ratna Pristiana Nandang, Asep Nasution, Emmi Rahmiwita Prastyanto, Yanwiyatono Pratama Sarwono, Aditya Purnama, Bastoni Ramadan, Tubagus Ahmad Riyandra, Reza Rosyadi, Safriansyah Yanwar Rozikin, Imam Samuel Wuisan, Ronald Sebastian, Rommy Siska Siska St. Laksanto Utomo Supangat, Ajis Suryawan, I Nengah Pasek Suseno, Wahyu Hanggoro Tampubolon, John Piter Taufan, Ridwan Anthony Taufiqurokhman Trisnaning, Theresia Wibisono, Sonny Yuliana Kemalasari, Ni Putu Yuwono, M. Sunandar Zakaria, Ricky Muhamad