Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Inisiatif Guru Sekolah Dasar Menyediakan Media Dan Bahan Pratikum Sains Di Tengah Keterbatasan Fasilitas Laboratorium Leha Arya Arvianti; Erwinestri Hanidar Nur Afifi; Karmin Keliata
SEARCH: Science Education Research Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): SEARCH: April 2024
Publisher : IAIN Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/search.v2i2.1469

Abstract

Inisiatif guru jika dihadapkan dengan keterbatasan fasilitas laboratorium mengunakan bahan-bahan sederhana yang ditemukan disekitar sekolah seperti memanfaatkan ruang kelas, peralatan sederhana, atau bantuan dari kolega atau komunitas lokal. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami secara mendalam inisiatif guru sekolah dasar dalam menyediakan media dan bahan praktikum sains di tengah keterbatasan fasilitas laboratorium. Populasi penelitian ini adalah tujuh guru sekolah dasar yang mengajar mata pelajaran sains. Metode pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling. Instrumen penelitian dapat mencakup panduan wawancara dan observasi untuk mengumpulkan data yang relevan, seperti jenis inisiatif guru menggunakan media dan bahan pratikum yang diambil, kendala yang dihadapi oleh guru, dan hal-hal yang digunakan guru dalam proses pratikum sains/solusi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 3 guru yang menggunakan alat peraga sederhana dengan memanfaatkan alam sebagai media pembelajaran, 2 guru yang menggunakan internet sebagai media pembelajaran, 1 guru yang memanfaatkan laboratorium unversitas dan 1 guru menggunakan fasilitas yang dapat menanamkan konsep pemahaman peserta didik. Adapun solusi yang dapat digunakan seperti memanfaatkan internet dan menggunakan bahan alam yang seadanya.
Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa MA Menggunakan MetodeThink Aloud Protocol (TAP) Afifi, Erwinestri Hanidar Nur; Diantoro, Markus; Wartono, Wartono
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Vol. 7, No. 2
Publisher : citeus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to find out the misconceptions experienced by students during the learning process using think aloud protocol (TAP) and physics multiple choice tests (TPGF) on hydrostatic pressure materials. This research design uses mixed method design with embedded experimental design. Quantitative data is obtained through N-gain calculations that show a high category with a score of 0.7. This indicates that there is a significant change in the mastery of the student's hydrostatic pressure concept after learning activities. Qualitative data analysis based on the results of the think aloud protocol also shows how students experience misconceptions by pouring their thoughts into the analysis of problems using image illustrations.
An An Exploratory Item Audit of Buoyancy Recognition and Displaced Volume Application among Prospective Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teachers Erwinestri Hanidar Nur Afifi; Oki Sandra Agnesa; Gladys Mahaut; Santi Ekawati
MISOOL: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/misool.v8i2.3371

Abstract

Correctly naming buoyancy does not establish the ability to apply displaced volume. This exploratory study integrated within-person response analysis and item auditing in archived basic science tests from 37 prospective Madrasah Ibtidaiyah teachers at IAIN Sorong. The 2024 dataset comprised 80 multiple-choice items. Analyses used archived-score summaries, conditional analytical keys, Wilson confidence intervals, and six exact McNemar comparisons with Holm adjustment. Thirty-two participants (86.49%) recognized the buoyancy label, whereas four (10.81%) correctly calculated buoyant force with 80% immersion. Twenty-eight recognized the label but failed the partial-immersion item, a paired difference of 75.68 percentage points (Holm-adjusted p < .0001). Fully versus partially submerged items differed by 35.14 percentage points (adjusted p = .001221). These differences concern specific items rather than causal format effects. Another item lacked a scientifically adequate neutral-buoyancy option and was excluded from correctness scoring. The study contributes a transparent way to distinguish response discrepancies warranting follow-up from item defects requiring revision. Findings suggest testing coordination among verbal, spatial, and mathematical representations; mental representations and misconceptions were not directly measured. Teacher education should use audited tasks with explanations and confidence ratings before assigning diagnostic labels.