Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.866
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Asy-Syari'ah al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Cepalo JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial Jurnal Investasi Islam VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Mutsla: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Muamalat : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Khazanah Hukum
Dewi Sulastri
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
OPTIMALISASI FUNGSI WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM STRUKTUR PEMERINTAHAN: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF KONSTITUSI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Dewi Sulastri; Abu Sanmas; Muhamad Abdul Kholik
AL-MUTSLA Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Al Mutsla
Publisher : STAIN MAJENE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/jstain.v7i2.2059

Abstract

Kedudukan wakil presiden dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial selama ini masih mengalami ambiguitas, terutama di Indonesia. Meski diakui sebagai pembantu presiden dalam konstitusi, scope pekerjaan dan wewenang wakil presiden tidak dijabarkan secara konkret. Fenomena ini berbeda dengan Amerika Serikat di mana posisi wakil presiden memiliki peranan yang lebih terstruktur melalui konstitusi yang lebih detail. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi fungsi wakil presiden melalui kajian komparatif antara sistem pemerintahan Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis dokumen konstitusional dan studi perbandingan hukum tata negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan dalam pengaturan fungsi wakil presiden di kedua negara. Di Indonesia, posisi wakil presiden dibatasi pada peran pembantu dan penjaga kontinuitas pemerintahan, sementara di Amerika Serikat wakil presiden memiliki peran ganda sebagai ketua senat dan sebagai calon pengganti presiden dengan mekanisme yang lebih jelas. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya reformasi konstitusional dan operasional untuk mengoptimalkan fungsi wakil presiden di Indonesia agar sistem checks and balances dapat berjalan lebih efektif. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan hukum tata negara komparatif dan memberikan rekomendasi praktis bagi penyempurnaan struktur pemerintahan Indonesia.
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS Hazar Kusmayanti; Sonny Dewi Judiasih; Dede Kania; Dewi Sulastri
Cepalo Vol 9 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v9no1.3677

Abstract

Customary dispute resolution institutions in Indonesia and the Philippines serve to provide indigenous peoples with access to justice beyond state courts. This research, employing a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical specification, highlights key differences between the two systems. In Indonesia, customary courts derive recognition from the 1945 Constitution, while in the Philippines, they are explicitly regulated under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997, leading to greater integration with the national legal system. Indonesian customary courts handle a broader range of disputes, whereas Philippine customary courts primarily focus on land rights and natural resource management. Additionally, Indonesian customary court decisions often face dualism in the application of customary and national law when reviewed by state courts, while Philippine customary court decisions are more systematically recognized and enforced within the formal legal framework.
Diskresi Presiden dalam Pengangkatan Menteri Negara: Analisis Konstitusional Batasan dan Pertanggungjawaban dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia: Presidential Discretion in the Appointment of State Ministers: A Constitutional Analysis of Limits and Accountability in Indonesia’s Presidential System Listyani Effendi; Dewi Sulastri
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Siyasi : Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v2i2.51376

Abstract

 This article discusses the discretionary authority of the President in the appointment and dismissal of ministers within Indonesia's presidential system of government. In this system, the President holds prerogative rights guaranteed by the Constitution, as stated in Article 17 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Although the President has considerable freedom, the use of such discretion is not absolute and must adhere to the principles of the rule of law, democracy, and good governance. Using a normative approach through library research, this article analyzes the constitutional foundation, limitations, and forms of accountability of presidential discretion in appointing ministers. It also evaluates President Prabowo Subianto’s cabinet reshuffle practices in response to political dynamics and public demands. The analysis shows that while ministerial appointments fall under the President's prerogative rights, their implementation must consider aspects of competence, integrity, and public accountability. Discretion should serve as a tool to enhance the effectiveness of governance, not as a means of exercising unchecked power. Therefore, transparency, professionalism, and accountability are fundamental principles in the exercise of executive discretion in Indonesia.  
Transformasi Digital dalam Fungsi Pengawasan Ombudsman: Implementasi E-government untuk Pelayanan Publik: Digital Transformation in the Ombudsman's Oversight Function: E-government Implementation for Public Services Melinda Dina Gussela; Dewi Sulastri
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siyasi
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.51673

Abstract

Digital transformation has changed the paradigm of public services in Indonesia, however the implementation of e-government presents new challenges in the form of digital maladministration that requires adaptive supervision. This research aims to analyze digital transformation in the supervisory function of the Ombudsman regarding the implementation of e-government for public services. The research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach with case studies, collecting data through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation studies analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The research results show that the Ombudsman faces significant institutional challenges including limited human resources competent in information technology, inadequate digital infrastructure, limited budget, and non-legally binding recommendation legal force. Digital maladministration develops in the form of unresponsive systems, personal data leaks, and algorithmic discrimination. Technology-based supervision strengthening strategies include developing integrated monitoring dashboards, utilizing big data analytics and artificial intelligence, strengthening collaborative governance, increasing digital literacy, and regulatory reform. This research concludes that effective e-government supervision requires a holistic approach integrating technology, human resources, regulations, and public participation dimensions to realize digital service accountability.
Co-Authors Abu Sanmas Abu Sanmas Abu Sanmas Adinda, Nendena Rizqi Dede Kania Dhea Maulidina Rahma Dian May Syifa Firdaus, Arifin Gita Faddillah Islam Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar I Gde Pantja Astawa Ihsanul Maarif Indriya Fathni Irfan Nurhakim Jauhari, Moh. Ahsanuddin Khoirunnisa, Saskia Fazrin Listyani Effendi Listyani Effendi M Yahya Wahyudin Melinda Dina Gussela Mohd Kamarulnizam Abdullah Muhamad Abdul Kholik Muhammad Dzaky Fikhruhu Muhammad Ilham Ridho Muhammad Riefky Alfathan Mutiara Jihan Aziza Nandang Najmudin Neng Yani Nurhayani Neng Yani Nurhayani Neng Yani Nurhayani, Neng Yani Neni Nuraeni, Neni Radiyana, Aan Raihan Muhammad Farras Rena Zulfaidah Rosada, Dede Sarip Muslim Sonny Dewi Judiasih Subqi Muhamad Fadhilah Hakim Subqi Muhammad Fadhilah Hakim Syahidin, Rosyad Zulbaidah Zulbaidah Zulbaidah, Zulbaidah Zulfaidah, Rena