Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Business, Law, and Education

Analysis of the Legal Status of Joint Office in Notary Civil Partnership: Perspective of Article 20 of UUJN-P Annisa, Yusifa Nur; Dewantara, Reka; Jauharoh, Arini
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v5i1.529

Abstract

This article focuses on the Analysis of the Legal Status of Joint Offices in Notary Civil Partnerships: Perspective of Article 20 of the Law Concerning Notary Positions (from now on UUJN-P), which focuses on the legal status of joint offices by notary civil partnerships. The research in this article uses normative juridical research. Aims to describe and analyze the legal status of establishing a joint office by a civil partnership of notaries. Notaries can enter into civil partnerships to form a joint office as regulated in Article 20 of Law Number 02 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 concerning Notary Positions. Establishing a joint office can be convenient for notaries when opening a notary office, which requires expensive costs. However, there is legal ambiguity regarding the regulation of the legal status of the establishment of a joint office by a notary civil association, where there is a synonym for terms in article 20 UUJN, which equates notary civil partnerships with notary joint offices and civil partnerships in the Civil Code.
Can Smart Contracts Have a Legality Valid in Indonesia? Berliana, Dina; Dewantara, Reka; Widyanti, Yenny Eta
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1079

Abstract

The development of digital technology has encouraged the use of smart contracts as an instrument for automating agreements in Blockchain-based electronic transactions. In the context of Indonesian law, the validity of a smart contract must meet the legal requirements for an agreement, as regulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, which includes the agreement between the parties, legal capacity, a transparent object of the agreement, and lawful causes. Additionally, data verification in smart contracts is a key element in guaranteeing the security, authenticity, and transparency of e-commerce transactions, which is related to the provisions in the ITE Law and the PDP Law. This verification aims to prevent data manipulation, reduce the risk of fraud, and increase trust in transactions by using encryption technology, digital signatures, and Blockchain-based identity. Smart contracts can be considered valid if they fulfill the terms of the agreement and data security principles, making their use in e-commerce more effective and reliable.
Legal Protection for Customers Related to the Minimum Transaction Limit for Gold Bullion Business Santoso, Ike Cyntia Putri; Dewantara, Reka; Widhiawati, Dyah
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (On Progress July-Desembe
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1156

Abstract

Gold is currently considered a profitable investment asset, and Indonesia is one of the countries with high gold production, contributing 4.15% of the world's gold supply. The government has responded to this potential by establishing bullion businesses as regulated in Law No. 4 of 2023 on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector and Financial Services Authority (OJK) Regulation No. 17 of 2024 on the Implementation of Bullion Business Activities. However, a legal issue has arisen in the form of a legal vacuum (rechtvacuum) regarding the minimum transaction threshold for gold in Gold Financing activities, which, according to Article 9(2) of the aforementioned POJK, is set at a minimum of 500 grams for the first transaction. This provision is deemed to not reflect proportional justice and hinder the principle of public benefit. This study employs a normative legal method with a legislative and conceptual approach to examine and formulate a more fair and beneficial minimum threshold for gold transactions, as well as address two research questions: (1) how the minimum threshold for gold transactions in bullion business activities is regulated based on POJK No. 17 of 2024, and (2) how legal protection for customers related to this provision is reviewed from the perspective of the Theory of Proportional Justice