Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

DESAIN PENGEMBANGAN MODEL CR2C (CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSIVE READING COMPREHENSION) BERBASIS LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM MEMBACA PEMAHAMAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI Ida Hamidah; Andoyo Sastromiharjo; Yeti Mulyati; Vismaia Sabariah Damaianti
Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 20 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/ssdg1043

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Indonesia termasuk salah satu negara yang memiliki kemampuan membaca yang rendah. Keterampilan abad 21 berorientasi pada segala hal yang bersifat digital, begitupun dalam hal membaca di kalangan mahasiswa. Model CR2C (Constructive Responsive Reading Comprehension) merupakan suatu model membaca interaktif yang diselaraskan dengan strategi membaca pemahaman responsif konstruktif dalam teks digital. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Research and Development (R&D) dengan model pengembangan model 4D (Define, Design, Develop, dan Disseminate). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah Model Miles dan Huberman dengan (collection, reduction, display, dan conclusion drawing/ veryfiying). Penelitian ini menghasilkan suatu analisis kebutuhan yaitu kebutuhan/keperluan (necessities), kekurangan (lacks), dan keinginan (Wants). Hasil yang diproleh dari penelitian ini adalah kemampuan memahami teks digital mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Kuningan yang berada pada kategori sangat rendah (5.48). Kompetensi pemahaman tertinggi terletak pada pemahaman literal pemahaman terendah terletak pada pemahaman apresiasi. Berdasarkan data yang diproleh, belum ada model yang mengarahkan mahasiswa untuk menjelajahi ruang informasi dan hyperlink di internet , begitupun dengan panduan menemukan dan menentukan suatu sumber yang relevan dan terpercaya. Dari hasil tersebut disusunlah suatu sintaks model beserta deskripsi langkah-langkahnya sebagai produk yang nanti bisa dikembangkan lagi oleh peneliti lain.
A systematic review on design thinking in science education research (DTiSER) on 21st century skills Mukhammad Aji Fatkhurrohman; Ida Hamidah; Andi Suhandi; Achmad Samsudin
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education
Publisher : CV. FOUNDAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/jasme.v5i1.517

Abstract

Background: Design thinking is essential for developing 21st-century competencies, and there is a growing need and interest in introducing design thinking to science education students.Aim: The purpose of this study was to review high-quality empirical research on design thinking in science education research (DTiSER) and explore future research perspectives.Method: A literature review based on a five-stage methodology comprising of (1) research article collection from the databases, (2) research article inclusion/exclusion norms, (3) reviewing the processed research articles, (4) analyzing the research articles to extract the information, and (5) inferring the extracted information to derive at the future research direction. The paper contributes to reviewing 31 research articles, specifically on design thinking in science education research (DTiSER).Results: The results indicate that: (1) Research trends on design thinking in science education research (DTiSER) between 2015 and 2023 increased. (2) The United States is a country that mainly conducts research on design thinking in science education research (DTiSER) between 2015 and 2023 (3) Research trends of highly cited papers published in academic journals between 2015 and 2023, i.e., articles written by Smith et al. (4)  The science materials that have been applied to design thinking from 2015 to 2023 are electricity, magnetism, mechanics, climate, planets, earth science,  conservation biology, environment, thermodynamics, disaster mitigation, soil classification,  microba and organisms.Conclusion: The implementation of design thinking in science education research refers to science materials applied in real-life contexts. Therefore, the implementation of design thinking can pave the way for broader innovations in contexts relevant to science content and also in science learning innovations.