p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.276
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Unprotected Land Ownership Rights in Corporate Land Acquisition Lego Karjoko; Nabila Rahma Safitri; Ravi Danendra
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.261

Abstract

Land ownership conflicts in Indonesia frequently emerge in plantation regions when local communities cultivate land in fact while corporations assert formal legal control over the same land. This situation generates agrarian disputes that expose structural tensions between the formal land certification regime and long-established patterns of community land use. This study examines the philosophical orientation underlying judicial reasoning in adjudicating disputes concerning Land Use Rights held by PT Perkebunan Nusantara Persero and evaluates the degree of legal protection granted to communities that cultivate land without formal certificates. The research applies a normative legal method through statutory and case approaches. The study relies on primary and secondary legal materials gathered through systematic literature review and analyzes them using deductive reasoning and interpretative analysis. The findings demonstrate that judicial panels in five cases placed primary emphasis on formal legal certainty by prioritizing documentary evidence of title and by disregarding factual realities related to community cultivation. This approach directs adjudication toward procedural compliance and limits consideration of substantive justice and social utility. The analysis further shows that the legal system has not provided adequate protection for affected communities. Effective preventive protection requires clearer regulatory arrangements governing land control by communities and state-owned enterprises. Effective repressive protection requires judges to assess both formal documentation and material evidence in a balanced manner. The study concludes that current judicial practice has not achieved equitable legal protection for communities engaged in cultivated land use.
Analisis Dasar Kebijakan Menteri ATR/BPN dalam Penetapan Hak Pengelolaan Atas Tanah Ulayat Yolva Febreight Arthania; Lego Karjoko; Sapto Hermawan
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 14, No 1: April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v14i1.116189

Abstract

Important resources Management rights over customary landnare a resource for human life and community welfare. Human life and community welfare are management rights over customary land. This study looks atnthe role of the state innland management, relevant laws, and land management rights, over land and natural resources. relevant laws, and constitutional rights to landnand natural resources. The aim is to evaluate how well the current laws in place and support the interests ofnthe community. Protect andnrealize the interestsnof the community. Collected through literature studies and using a socio-legal research approach along with a conceptual and legal framework. The results of the study emphasize then need for the government to establish a complete and clear legislative framework for land management, as well as the recognition and defense of 'indigenous peoples' land rights. To address land inequality and ensure equitable and sustainable use and distribution of land resources, this study suggests agrarian reform.
AGRARIAN REFORM POLICY AS A TOOL FOR RESOLVING LAND TENURE CONFLICTS INVOLVING FORMER BUSINESS USE RIGHTS OF PT GUCI SARI TEGAL Yuniar Sabdaningtyas; Lego Karjoko; Anti Mayastuti
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 15 No 2 (2026): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8128

Abstract

This study aims to formulate agrarian reform policy as an instrument for resolving land tenure conflicts on the former Right to Cultivate (HGU) land of PT Guci Sari in Tegal Regency. This research employs an empirical legal method with a qualitative approach. Research data sources were obtained through primary data in the form of interviews and observations, while secondary data were gathered from other legal sources. The results indicate that Agrarian Reform has served as tangible evidence of an effective conflict resolution instrument through a coordinative mediation mechanism. Based on Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR Law), the two-phase conflict resolution on the former HGU land of PT Guci Sari was carried out through non-litigation channels emphasizing the principle of deliberation (musyawarah). The first phase involved mediation by the National Land Agency (BPN) to unravel the company's historical claims, whose rights had expired since 2016. The second phase was resolved through mediation by the Agrarian Reform Task Force (GTRA) along with cross-sectoral agencies, including the Forest Management Unit (KPH), the Housing and Settlement Areas Agency (Perkim), and the Pemalang Regency Government, to mediate land disputes between tenant farmers from Tegal and Pemalang Regencies. This implementation aligns with the problem-solving strategy theory to achieve a fair agreement. Ultimately, this policy produced concrete results in the form of determining the subjects and objects of asset redistribution, providing legal certainty through the issuance of Land Ownership Certificates (Sertifikat Hak Milik) for the tenant farmers.
Legal Policy of Old Wells Petroleum Mining Management Based on Social Justice in Realising Energy Sovereignty Lego Karjoko; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Willy Naresta Hanum
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 2, July 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.1745.pp286-303

Abstract

Indonesia has the potential for oil from old wells of 10,000 barrels per day, but this potential is not optimally regulated. Hence, its management cannot realise social justice. This research aims to provide a prescription for the distribution of benefits and public participation in managing petroleum in old wells because all provisions for old wells do not accommodate the public interest. This research uses normative legal research utilising a statutory, conceptual, and case approach to analyse the regulation policy related to old wells management. Data were collected by investigating primer and seconder legal material. The results show that the distribution of benefits related to profit-sharing for oil management services at old wells did not reflect justice. Thus, it is causing a lot of illegal mining activities. Moreover, public participation in determining policies is still at the pseudo participation (informing level). Therefore the actual participation has not been accommodated in related regulations of old wells management.
Kajian Yuridis Pengaturan Perizinan Pertambangan Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Transendental Guna Mewujudkan Ekokrasi di Indonesia Lucky Putri Selomitha; Lego Karjoko; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2024: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaturan mengenai perizinan pertambangan di indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif hukum transendental, serta untuk mengkaji keoptimalan penegakan hukum pengaturan perizinan pertambangan dalam mewujudkan ekokrasi di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik analisis data menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini, pertama dengan disahkannya UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2020, pemerintah pusat memperoleh kendali eksklusif atas penyelenggaraan IUP, sehingga menghapuskan kewenangan pemerintah daerah. Pengaturan tersebut mempercepat proses perizininan. Akan tetapi, dengan menurunnya kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah, dengan sendirinya kesejahteraan masyarakat dan lingkungan disekitar wilayah pertambangan tidak mendapat perhatian maksimal. Apabila pengaturan tersebut dianalisis dari hukum transendental, maka sebaiknya peran daripada Pemerintah Provinsi dan Pemerintah Daerah dalam perizinan pertambangan jangan dihilangkan sama sekali, demi mewujudkan keselamatan dan keberlangsungan ekosistem alam yang merupakan ciptaan Sang Khalik dan kemaslahatan masyarakat. Kedua, pengaturan perizinan pertambangan dalam UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2020, meskipun menghapus kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah, akan tetapi juga mulai membuka cakrawala baru tentang aspek yuridis tentang pengelolaan pertambangan dan aspek lingkungannya guna mewujudkan ekokrasi di Indonesia. Dari aspek lingkungan, UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 mulai mengakomodir secara lebih maksimal beberapa permasalahan lingkungan, walaupun secara prinsip lingkungan masih banyak terlewati.
Konsep Keadilan Agraria dalam Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam Rizqiaranti Salsabila; Lego Karjoko; Rahayu Subekti
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2025: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria 1960 merupakan aturan dasar dalam pengelolaan dan pemanfaatan sumber daya alam di Indonesia dengan salah satu tujuannya ingin menciptakan keadilan bagi negara dan rakyat. Walaupun telah ditetapkan sebagai tujuannya, keadilan sebagaimana yang dimaksud oleh Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria 1960 tersebut masih saja terasa belum jelas pengertian, kedudukan, lingkup serta liku-liku mengenainya. Ketidakjelasan konsep keadilan ini berimplikasi berbagai hal, termasuk kepada ketidakjelasan tujuan akhir yang diinginkan undang-undang tersebut. Namun demikian, jika dikaji secara teoritik, konsep keadilan yang dimaksudkan oleh Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria 1960 lebih dekat dekat dengan konsep dalam teori utilitarianisme, yakni ingin menciptakan kebahagiaan bagi sebagian besar masyarakat Indonesia. Akhirnya berdasarkan konsep dalam utilatianisme kebahagiaan selayaknya dapat dinikmati oleh setiap orang/individu, tetapi bila tidak dapat dicapai, maka diupayakan agar kebahagiaan itu dapat dinikmati oleh sebanyak mungkin individu dalam masyarakat (the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people).
Implementasi Kebijakan Reforma Agraria di Kelurahan Mojo, Kecamatan Pasar Kliwon Aldo Putra Yudhistira; Lego Karjoko; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2025: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Reforma Agraria di Indonesia merupakan sebuah pilar krusial untuk mewujudkan keadilan sosial dan pemerataan ekonomi, khususnya di Kelurahan Mojo, Surakarta. Sejak proklamasi kemerdekaan, Reforma Agraria telah diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) Tahun 1960 sebagai landasan hukum utama. Sinkronisasi Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) dan Rencana Detail Tata Ruang (RDTR) dengan kebutuhan agraria masyarakat Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah hukum normatif peraturan perundang-undangan. Meskipun dihadapkan pada hambatan, program Reforma Agraria didukung oleh kesadaran kolektif masyarakat, inisiatif digitalisasi data oleh pemerintah daerah, dan komitmen politik pusat melalui pendekatan "Reforma Agraria Plus." Keberhasilan program ini menuntut pendekatan holistik dan partisipatif, yang mencakup pembaruan sistem hukum, penguatan Gugus Tugas Reforma Agraria (GTRA), pemberdayaan ekonomi berkelanjutan, transformasi sosial yang inklusif, pertimbangan ekologis, dan sistem monitoring yang transparan. Sinergi kuat antar aspek legal, kelembagaan, ekonomi, sosial, dan lingkungan, didukung oleh komitmen semua pihak di Kelurahan Mojo.
Legal Aspects of The Elimination of Agricultural Land use in Regional Spatial Planning Irene Vera Purba; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Spatial planning is crucial in regulating land use and utilization for sustainable development. However, in practice, there are still discrepancies between spatial planning and development implementation in various regions, which result in regional development imbalances, environmental degradation, and resource constraints. This research analyzes the factors causing the mismatch between spatial planning and actual development, particularly in the context of the removal of agricultural land use in the spatial planning of Surakarta City, and examines the impact of these issues. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a conceptual approach and analysis of the applicable laws and regulations. The research results indicate that inconsistencies in satial planning occur due to overlapping policies, inconsistent planning revisions, and weak supervision in implementing regulations. The conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural areas threatens food security and negatively impacts ecosystem balance and environmental carrying capacity. Therefore, synergy between the government, society, and the private sector is needed in formulating and implementing spatial planning based on sustainability principles. Strengthening regulations, providing incentives for the preservation of agricultural land, and utilizing digital mapping technology can address this issue to achieve development that is in harmony with environmental carrying capacity.
Penegakan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Pertambangan Minerba di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Progresif Amien Fajar Khuzaeni; Lego Karjoko; Anita Zulfiani
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i5.9681

Abstract

Penegakan hukum tindak pidana di sektor pertambangan mineral dan batubara (minerba) di Indonesia hingga saat ini masih didominasi oleh paradigma positivisme hukum yang kaku dan prosedural. Pendekatan formalistik tersebut terbukti gagal mengatasi kejahatan pertambangan terorganisasi, cenderung tajam ke bawah terhadap penambang rakyat, serta mengabaikan kerusakan ekologis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keterbatasan pendekatan positivistik serta merumuskan konstruksi implementasi Hukum Progresif dalam penegakan hukum pidana minerba yang berkeadilan dan berwawasan lingkungan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa Hukum Progresif memberikan landasan doktrinal untuk menggeser paradigma penegakan hukum dari sekadar keadilan prosedural (procedural justice) menuju keadilan ekologis dan substantif. Implementasi Hukum Progresif dilakukan melalui: 1) penerapan Corporate Criminal Responsibility dan doktrin strict liability untuk menjangkau beneficial owner; 2) pergeseran sanksi pemulihan ekologis dari ultimum remedium menjadi primum remedium; 3) pembedaan respons pidana melalui mekanisme restorative justice bagi Penambangan Tanpa Izin (PETI) skala subsisten rakyat; serta 4) penguatan sinergi integratif antar-penegak hukum dengan pendekatan multi-door approach. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Hukum Progresif menuntut keberanian moral dan diskresi positif dari aparat penegak hukum.
Implementation of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of the Prohibition on Giving Money and Goods to Vagrants and Beggars in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Muhammad Yusrizal; Lego Karjoko
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3073

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of administrative sanctions in law enforcement against violations of the prohibition on giving money and goods to homeless people and beggars in the Special Region of Yogyakarta from the perspective of state administrative law. This study uses a normative legal research method (juridical normative) with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the application of administrative sanctions against violations of the prohibition on giving money and goods is an instrument of social control that falls under the authority of the regional government as a form of government coercion (bestuursdwang). The applied administrative sanctions, such as verbal warnings, written warnings, and other administrative actions, aim to foster public legal compliance and support the effectiveness of social development and rehabilitation programs. However, the effectiveness of the implementation of these sanctions still faces various obstacles, including low public legal awareness, strong social empathy values ​​that encourage violations, limited apparatus resources, and weak coordination between related agencies. In addition, the validity of administrative actions is highly dependent on the apparatus' compliance with the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), especially the principles of legal certainty, proportionality, and accuracy.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Jaelani Abdul Wahid Adi Sulistiyono Aida Fatma Airlangga Surya Nagara Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Aldo Putra Yudhistira Alvin Devote Azaria Ardana Amalia Nurul Hanifah Amien Fajar Khuzaeni An Nissa Ayu Mutia Andi adinda Asty Maharaja Anis H Bajrektarevic Anita Zulfiani Annisa Fianni Sisma Annisa Hartami Anti Mayastuti Anurat Anantanatorn Arifin Ma’aruf Aristo Lanang Langgeng Asmoro Arvin Asta Nugraha Asih Wastuti Asih Wastuti Bambang Manumayoso Bima Setya Aji Clarisa Mutia Huda Dian Furqani Tenrilawa Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih Ditya Metta Ayu Fernanda Dyah Ayu Sri Wilujeng Eka Rismawati Elin Setiawati Era Fortuna Istanlama Farida Patittingi Fatma Ulfatun Najicha Fatma Ulfatun Najicha Fatma Ulfatun Najicha Fitria Rahmawati Hari Purwadi Hayat, Muhammad Jihadul Hendra Wasaraka Henning Glaser Henning Glaser Hilaire Tegnan Hilaire Tegnan I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rahmi Handayani I Gusti Ketut Rachmi Handayani Ida Nurlinda Intan Hanisa Intan Hanisa Irene Vera Purba Isharyanto Isharyanto Jaco Barkhuizen Jaco Barkhuizen Jadmiko Anom Husudo Jaelani, Abdul Kadir Jalu Ario Setyo Utomo Jelang Fajar Putra Perdana Jonathan Chandra Suryajaya Josephine Santosa King Faisal Sulaiman Lucky Putri Selomitha M. Hudi Asrori S. Mawar Mumtaza MG. Thesa Deta Murbasari Mohd Rizal Palil Muhammad Arya Ansar Muhammad Reza Fadhil Pratama Muhammad Rizky Akbar Ismail Muhammad Yusrizal Nabila Rahma Safitri Nadila Maysila Herdarezki Nasrullah Nasrullah Ninna Ghonia Noventasya Nidya Megasafitri Nurul Satria Abdi Obed Robbani ponco Edi ahmad ponco Praninditya Estri Fauzia Rachma Indriyani Raden Rara Mutiara Wijaya Rahayu Subekti Ravi Danendra Ravi Danendra Reza Amirul Hatman Rizky Adi Nugraha Rizqiaranti Salsabila Robby Bagus Indrawan Rosita Chandrakirana Sapto Hermawan Sapto Hermawan Shania Lorusso Silvester Anang Prananto Timur Supriyonohadi Supriyonohadi Virtha Dwi Oktavianny Lomboan Waluyo Waluyo Waluyo Waluyo Willy Naresta Hanum Willy Naresta Hanum Yazid Fatoni Yolva Febreight Arthania Yudistira Yudistira Yuniar Sabdaningtyas Zaidah Nur Rosidah