Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.956
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial qolamuna : Jurnal studi islam SENTIA 2016 Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang Adbis : Jurnal Administrasi dan Bisnis Jurnal Pengabdian Polinema Kepada Masyarakat Yuridika Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Jurnal Pengabdian Mandiri Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains West Science Social and Humanities Studies Joong-Ki West Science Islamic Studies Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat J-CEKI Syaikhuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pranata Islam STAI Syaichona Moh. Cholil Bangkalan Leges Privatae Journal of Adat Recht
Shohib Muslim
Departemen Teknologi Informasi, Politeknik Negeri Malang, Malang, 65141
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Leges Privatae

 1 
Civil Law in Market Governance: Legal Instruments, Economic Policy, and State Power Shohib Muslim
Leges Privatae Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): DECEMBER-JOY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/mdad4f26

Abstract

Modern market governance is no longer shaped solely by free market mechanisms but increasingly relies on state intervention through legally institutionalized economic policies. In this context, civil law—particularly through contracts, property rights, and civil liability—has become a strategic instrument for directing market behavior. This development generates normative ambiguity in positive law concerning the boundary between civil law as private law and as a tool of market governance, the legitimacy of using private law instruments to implement economic policy, and the relationship between freedom of contract and public interest–based economic regulation. Employing normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and case approaches, this article examines the role of civil law in market governance and the juridical implications of state intervention through private law instruments. The analysis demonstrates that unstructured instrumentalization of civil law undermines legal certainty and private autonomy while obscuring the limits of state power. This article argues for a normative reconstruction that positions civil law as a limited instrument of economic policy, grounded in conditional private autonomy, proportionality, and accountability, in order to balance economic efficiency, legal certainty, and social justice within market regulation.
Civil Law and Social Inequality: A Politics of Legal Protection Perspective Shohib Muslim
Leges Privatae Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): DECEMBER-JOY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/5x64ag20

Abstract

Civil law is normatively constructed on the assumption of formal equality among legal subjects. In social reality, however, civil law relations frequently operate within conditions of structural inequality arising from disparities in economic power, access to information, and bargaining position. The state responds to such inequalities through regulatory interventions framed as legal protection. This article examines the role of civil law in addressing social inequality from a legal protection politics perspective. Employing normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and case approaches, this study identifies normative ambiguity in civil law concerning the criteria for identifying protected weak parties, the boundary between legal protection and restrictions on private autonomy, and inconsistencies between the Civil Code and social-economic protection legislation. The findings demonstrate that such ambiguity renders civil law protection selective and often ineffective in correcting social inequality. This article argues for a normative reconstruction that positions civil law as a constitutional instrument for correcting social inequality, treating private autonomy as a conditional principle subject to substantive and distributive justice considerations.
Co-Authors Abdul Chalim Abdul Muqit Akhlis Rizza, Muhammad Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial Ane Fany Novitasari Ari Murtono Arief Fahmi Lubis Asfari Hariz Santoso Asrul Ibrahim Nur Becik Gati Anjari Dina Imam Supaat Fadloli Farida Akbarina Hairus hairus hairus Hudriyah Mundzir Hudriyah Mundzir Joice Soraya Kalijunjung Hasibuan Khrisna Hadiwinata Khrisna Hadiwinata Komarudin Achmad Loso Judijanto M. Nanak Zakaria Mirin Primudyastutie Moh. Abdullah Anshori Muktar Muktar Nana Rolina Masloman Nandaru Ramadhan Nurul Hidayatinnisa' Rahman Rahman Retnawati Siregar Rizqi Khoirunnisa Rokiyah Sabil Mokodenseho Sabil Mokodenseho Sahrul Sahrul Sanita Dhakirah Shinta Hadiyantina Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sri Hudiarini Supena Diansah Tindra Manangin Yaqub Cikusin Yushintia Pramitarini