Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.247
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika dan Matematika Terapan saintis Humanis : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora INSPIRAMATIKA MIDA : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Postulat : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Jurnal Riset Rumpun Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JURRIMIPA) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bhinneka Polinomial : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE) J-ABDIPAMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) SABAJAYA Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa Riemann : Research of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Luluk Faridah
Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : INSPIRAMATIKA

 1 
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HOTS BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI SOLO Auliyau Rohman; Luluk Faridah; Khafidhoh Nurul Aini
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Inspiramatika, December 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/inspiramatika.v6i2.2137

Abstract

This study discusses students' understanding of the completion of HOTS based on the SOLO taxonomy. When understanding the concepts of students being analyzed namely (1) restate the concept, (2) classify objects based on certain traits, (3) use and utilize and choose certain procedures or operations, (4) 5) provide examples and not examples of an concept, (6) developing the necessary or sufficient requirements of a concept, (7) applying a concept or logarithm in problem solving. The subjects of this study were 15 students of MTs Model A'isyatul Wahidah class VIII which were divided into 3 levels: unistructural, multistructural and relational. The questions given consist of 2 essay questions (descriptions) that meet HOTS indicators and concept understanding. From this test can be seen indicators of understanding the concept. Each data obtained was analyzed in a descriptive form.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA Luluk Faridah; Heny Ekawati Haryono; Alifatun Ni’mah
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 6 No 1 (2020): Inspiramatika, June 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 8 grade VII-A students of SMP NU SIMO for the 2019/2020 academic year. The determination of the subject was based on the results of a questionnaire on the characteristics of the way of thinking. The data used are test results and recorded interview results. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete sequential type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the SK1 subject is at the level of only fulfilling 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Whereas in the SK2 subject only fulfills 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 3, 4, 5, and 7. (2) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of students' abstract sequential type of thinking in solving problems on the subject of SA1 and SA2 is at a level that meets all indicators of concept understanding. (3) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on AK1 subjects is at a level that only meets 5 indicators of conceptual understanding, namely 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7. While the AK2 subject is at a level that is meet all indicators of concept understanding. (4) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of abstract random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the AA1 subject is at a level that only meets 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely 3, 4, 5, 7. Whereas in AA2 subject only meets 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HOTS BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI SOLO Auliyau Rohman; Luluk Faridah; Khafidhoh Nurul Aini
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Inspiramatika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, December 20
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/inspiramatika.v6i2.2137

Abstract

This study discusses students' understanding of the completion of HOTS based on the SOLO taxonomy. When understanding the concepts of students being analyzed namely (1) restate the concept, (2) classify objects based on certain traits, (3) use and utilize and choose certain procedures or operations, (4) 5) provide examples and not examples of an concept, (6) developing the necessary or sufficient requirements of a concept, (7) applying a concept or logarithm in problem solving. The subjects of this study were 15 students of MTs Model A'isyatul Wahidah class VIII which were divided into 3 levels: unistructural, multistructural and relational. The questions given consist of 2 essay questions (descriptions) that meet HOTS indicators and concept understanding. From this test can be seen indicators of understanding the concept. Each data obtained was analyzed in a descriptive form.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA Luluk Faridah; Heny Ekawati Haryono; Alifatun Ni’mah
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 6 No 1 (2020): Inspiramatika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, June 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 8 grade VII-A students of SMP NU SIMO for the 2019/2020 academic year. The determination of the subject was based on the results of a questionnaire on the characteristics of the way of thinking. The data used are test results and recorded interview results. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete sequential type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the SK1 subject is at the level of only fulfilling 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Whereas in the SK2 subject only fulfills 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 3, 4, 5, and 7. (2) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of students' abstract sequential type of thinking in solving problems on the subject of SA1 and SA2 is at a level that meets all indicators of concept understanding. (3) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of concrete random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on AK1 subjects is at a level that only meets 5 indicators of conceptual understanding, namely 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7. While the AK2 subject is at a level that is meet all indicators of concept understanding. (4) The ability to understand concepts with the characteristics of abstract random type students' way of thinking in solving problems on the AA1 subject is at a level that only meets 4 indicators of concept understanding, namely 3, 4, 5, 7. Whereas in AA2 subject only meets 6 indicators of concept understanding, namely indicators 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
ANALISIS BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS Aulia, Defi Putri; Faridah, Luluk; Rohim, Abdur
INSPIRAMATIKA Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Inspiramatika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, December 20
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/inspiramatika.v9i2.4790

Abstract

The ability of students in Indonesia in terms of critical thinking is not yet high enough. Possible solutions include giving open ended questions to students. This research aims to determine whether students with various mathematical logical intelligences can use critical thinking to solve problems. The research methodology applied is descriptive qualitative. A total of 6 students were used as study subjects who were class VII-B students at SMPN 2 Sukodadi. As a tool, a logical-mathematical intelligence questionnaire was provided which was followed by a test to see the ability to solve problems. The resulting data is in the form of test results and interview results. The research results identified that: (1) Subjects who have high mathematical logical intelligence can go through 4 stages of critical thinking, including interpretation, analysis, evaluation and inference, and are classified as TKBK 4 (very critical); (2) Subjects who have moderate mathematical logical intelligence can go through 3 stages of critical thinking including interpretation, analysis and evaluation, and are classified as TKBK 3 (critical); (3) Subjects who have low mathematical logical intelligence can only go through 1 stage of critical thinking, namely interpretation, and are classified as TKBK 1 (less critical).
Co-Authors A. Fitriani Abdur Rohim, Abdur Ahmad Ubaidillah Alifatun Ni’mah Almubarokah, Nurul Hidayah Antonius Rino Vanchapo Aulia, Defi Putri Auliyau Rohman Bilqisthi, Nadaina Budi Sasomo, Budi Dian Kusmaharti Dian Kusmaharti Dinita Rahmalia, Dinita Elin Rias Tuti Emmy Hamidah Ernaningsih Ernaningsih Ernaningsih Ernaningsih Faisatun Nasihah, Faisatun Fathul Fuad Attamini Hafidh, Muhammad Abdullah Henny Ekawati Haryono Heny Ekawati Haryono Irawan Irawan Jemmy Jemmy* Khafidhoh Nurul Aini, Khafidhoh Nurul Kurnia, Heri Kushariyadi Kushariyadi Loso Judijanto Lukmanul Khakim M. Faris Naufal Hamdani Melia Anggraini Mohammad Naufal Abdi Muhammad Suwarsono, Muhammad Mustofa Mustofa Mustofa Mustofa Nenden Hasanah Robiatul Awaliah Nur Kurniasari Permatasari, Armita Petrus Jacob Pattiasina Puspa, Eka Septariana Rahim, Abd Safarudin, Muhamad Sigid Siti Mutmainnah Varissa Sarahma Murti Via Yustitia Yamin , Muhammad Zainal Abidin