Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.926
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yuridis Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Comparative Law Review Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies Jurnal Konstitusi Riau Law Journal Unisia Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Susi Dwi Harijanti
Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 30 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kelemahan Fundamental UUD 1945: Pra dan Pasca Amandemen Susi Dwi Harijanti
Unisia No. 49: Tahun XXVI Triwulan III 2003
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol26.iss49.art4

Abstract

The downfall of the New Order government in 1998 marked the 'democratic rebirth', which was conducted through a series of constitutional amendments, starting from 1999 until 2002. The radical changes, indeed, is being made. However, constitutional amendments contain many shortcomings as whole amendments took place in the 'state in transition'. One consequences of this is that amendments seem to be more spontaneously adapting to realities. This in turn creates lack of conceptual basis, illcohesiveness and poor drafting. All these fundamental defects undoubtedly will affect democratisation  process. This Article aims to examine the fundamental problems of the 1945 Constitution in the period of pre and after the amendments.
Indonesia’s Approach to International Treaties: Balancing National Interests and International Obligations Atip Latipulhayat; Susi Dwi Harijanti
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, Volume 6, Number 2, Juni 2022
Publisher : International Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/pjil.v6i2.915

Abstract

The relation and interaction between international and domestic law is one of the classic issues in international and it controversy remains in the realm of theory and practice. This is an issue of which many generations of both international and constitutional lawyers have wrestled, are wrestling and will continue to wrestle. For the Indonesian context, this issue is also still far from clear. The Indonesian Constitution of 1945 stipulates that the President of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to conclude treaties with other countries. However, it does not clearly and specifically govern the status and position of international treaties under the Constitution. As a result, the Indonesian approach to international treaty is rather pragmatic, which is susceptible to some inconsistencies. It can be seen for instance in several decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court that clearly demonstrates the ambiguity towards international treaty. The Indonesian Parliament (DPR) argues that Indonesia should put emphasize to the national interests when Indonesia concluded international treaties. For a certain extent this approach is vulnerable to disregard international obligations in the name of national interests. There are some legislation for instance in the field of trade, which contains national interests clause that potentially will put Indonesia as the party that disregards its international obligations. This paper argues that national interests and international obligations are mutually inclusive, and not mutually exclusive element. To this end, international treaties should have a clear status and position under the Indonesian constitution to ensure that national interest and international obligation are working in harmony.
Complaint Handling Systems In The Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis Between Indonesia and Australia Harijanti, Susi Dwi
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 3, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v3i1.11454

Abstract

This article deals primarily with complaint handling system with reference to an ombudsman that established by the government as opposed to the private ombudsman variety in Indonesia and Australia’s jurisdictions. In practice, group of people or persons have often arisen complaints or grievances in public service, and it requires solutions. It is widely known that the Ombudsman office has long been regarded as an effective office in resolving people complaint. This is mainly because the nature of the Ombudsman as an independent and impartial institution. This article argues that regardless of the different context of introduction of an ombudsman in Indonesia and Australia because of different political and social context, however, the performance of ombudsman in both countries has showed significant role in enhancing public services through their expanded mandates and stronger powers.
The Constitutionality of Outsourcing Job Regulation in the Law on Job Creation Sisinaru, Sostones Y; Harijanti, Susi Dwi
LAW REFORM Vol 18, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (589.331 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v18i1.44249

Abstract

Government policy to adopt the idea of “omnibus law” through the forming of Job Creation Law aims to simplify investment and to fix regulations in Indonesia. Job creation Law consists of 11 clusters. One of the clusters regulates manpower mainly concerning Outsourcing Minimum Wage and termination of employment. This policy has potential to bring disadvantages to the interest of the workers and leads to protest by workers/labors.  This study aims to investigate political direction of job Creation Law and question the constitutionality of the regulations of outsourcing work in Job Creation Law. Research method of this study was normative, meaning that by using legislation and conceptual approach to perform qualitative analysis. The result and Discussion of this study concludes that political direction of Job creation Law is still authoritarian politics so that resulting in Law that is conservative because the discussion about the Law did not involve the people participation. Moreover, the material formulation of outsourcing in Job Creation Bill has not aligned with the mandate of Supreme Court decision No 27/PUU-IX/2011.
COMPARISON OF INDEPENDENT REGIONAL INSTITUTIONS THAT CONSULTATIVE IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM Hadita, Cynthia; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Afnila, Afnila; Azwar, T. Keizerina Devi
Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies INSIS 5 (March 2023)
Publisher : Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Independent regional institutions as derivatives of independent state institutions or will be studied can regional institutions be formed on the basis of regional needs and regulated in laws and regulations, so that a comparison will be made with France and the United States regarding independent regional institutions that are consultative with those that are implemented or that have not been implemented in the local government system in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical. The results showed that Indonesia does not yet have independent regional institutions that are consultative, compared to France and America have independent regional institutions that are consultative so that local/state governments can take appropriate policies.
The Idea of Presidential Term Limit as an Implicit Unamendable Provision: Gagasan Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Presiden sebagai Implicit Unamendable Provision Hatim, Ahmad; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Giri Ahmad Taufik
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2142

Abstract

The discourse on amending Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution to extend the presidential term has surfaced on multiple occasions. The author’s hypothesis asserts that such an amendment is not only challenging but fundamentally unfeasible, as it constitutes an implicit unamendable provision. This article examines this hypothesis using a normative juridical method, which involves analyzing legal norms, principles, and doctrines through a positive legal approach. The study concludes that Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution represents an implicit unamendable provision, as evidenced by its historical context, its interrelation with other constitutional provisions, relevant court decisions, and the procedural framework of the constitutional amendment process.
Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Perspektif Demokrasi Deliberatif JAMALUDDIN, MUHAMMAD NUR; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Prasetianingsih, Rahayu
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 21, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Juni 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v21i2.1232

Abstract

Perubahan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 masih jauh dari proses demokrasi deliberatif. Padahal sejatinya keterlibatan rakyat merupakan sesuatu hal yang mutlak, agar perubahan tidak sarat akan kepentingan politik saja, tetapi seharusnya mengedepankan kepentingan rakyat sebagai wujud dari kedaulatan rakyat. Perubahan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 belum menerapkan prinsip demokrasi deliberatif karena cenderung lebih banyak mengandung politisasi MPR dan bersifat elitis daripada keterlibatan rakyat. Demokrasi deliberatif yang digagas merupakan solusi alternatif dan bermanfaat bagi negara-negara demokrasi, masih dapat menjadi pilihan terbaik bagi Indonesia. Minimnya peran MPR memberikan ruang publikkepada rakyat dalam amendemen, mengharuskan MPR memperkokoh sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia guna melibatkan rakyat melalui pemberdayaan dan penguatan kewenangan DPD dalam proses amendemen. Praktiknya dapat menerapkan sistem e-debelibarative democracy, tentunya proses ini mesti memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat dan tertuang dalam konstitusi serta beradaptasi terhadap perkembangan digitalisasi
FASILITASI PARTISIPASI BURUH DAN MAHASISWA DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH DI KOTA BANDUNG Harijanti, Susi Dwi; SUSANTO, MEI; ADHIHERNAWAN, MUHAMMAD YOPPY
Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/kumawula.v6i1.43438

Abstract

Kepercayaan terhadap lembaga perwakilan, baik di tingkat pusat maupun di tingkat daerah selalu dalam posisi yang rendah. Kepercayaan rendah tersebut disebabkan banyaknya peraturan perundang-undangan yang tidak mendapat validitas dari masyarakat. Berdasarkan perspektif teori, validitas suatu peraturan perundang-undangan bisa didapatkan melalui partisipasi publik. Maka dari itu, pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan harus dilakukan melalui partisipasi yang bermakna dalam rangka menjaga perwujudan demokrasi dan hak asasi manusia masyarakat. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, tim kami menginisiasikan program pengabdian kepada masyarakat yang memiliki dua tujuan, pertama yakni memberikan pemahaman kepada anggota dewan dan masyarakat mengenai pentingnya partisipasi yang bermakna dalam pembentukan regulasi. Maka dari itu, metode yang digunakan dalam pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah metode focus group discussion dengan melibatkan anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat, buruh di Kota Bandung, dan Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa di Universitas Padjadjaran. Alasan pemilihan buruh dan mahasiswa untuk mewakili unsur masyarakat sebab buruh merupakan kelompok masyarakat yang rentan secara ekonomi dan menjadi pihak terdampak langsung dari Rancangan Peraturan Daerah yang saat ini sedang disusun, yakni Raperda Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan. Sedangkan alasan pemilihan mahasiswa sebab dalam praktiknya mahasiswa seringkali memiliki aspirasi dalam jalannya pemerintahan. Hasil dari program pengabdian ini yakni terwujudnya forum yang dapat memfasilitasi buruh dan mahasiswa untuk menyampaikan aspirasi dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah, meskipun demikian program ini belum bisa memastikan apakah aspirasi tersebut dipertimbangkan dan diberikan penjelasan mengenai diterima ataukah tidaknya, namun kami berhadap ada kesadaran dan pemahaman yang muncul dari sosialisasi yang kami lakukan mengenai pentingnya partisipasi yang bermakna dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan.
Hakikat Otonomi Daerah Yang Luas, Nyata Dan Bertanggung Jawab Dalam Perspektif Utilitarianisme Cynthia Hadita; Susi Dwi Harijanti
Riau Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.6.2.198-211

Abstract

The problem that arises because the regions do not have absolute independence to take care of their own household affairs can be one of the factors that hinder Indonesia from becoming a welfare state through the progress of the regions. The problem of the essence of regional autonomy at the level of implementation of its system in the frame of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is still not in accordance with the nature of broad, real, and responsible regional autonomy so that this will also hinder the achievement of the greatest happines of the greatest number for as in the theory of utilitarianism in achieving the goal of the state to become a welfare state ). The research method used is normative juridical by taking a historical approach and legislation. The results showed that the urgency of implementing broad, real, and responsible regional autonomy is needed in the regional government system in order to meet regional needs with the essence of autonomy possessed in order to realize the greatest happiness of the regional community.
Constitutional Repair through Opposition Reform: Designing the Right of the Opposition and Incentive Systems to Counter Democratic Deterioration in Indonesia Susanto, Mei; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Perwira, Indra; Hernawan, Muhammad Yoppy Adhi
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.29349

Abstract

This article explores the deterioration of democracy in Indonesia attributed to the lack of effective opposition within its presidential multiparty system. The dominance of fat coalitions in the legislature has undermined the checks and balances function of the House of Representatives (DPR), reducing it to a body that merely approves government proposals including problematic legislation and controversial public programs without meaningful scrutiny. The lack of institutional support and incentives for opposition parties has contributed to this dysfunction, as coalition participation offers access to public office, funding, and legal protection, while opposition yields none. In response, this article proposes the institutionalization of the Rights of the Opposition,  which includes: the right to hold leadership positions in DPR organizational bodies; special rights in the legislative process such as the right to delay the deliberation of constitutionally significant or publicly controversial bills; the right to initiate and lead oversight mechanisms; influence budget deliberations; and participate in the appointment of public officials. It also outlines the need for specific incentives such as protocol privileges, financial resources for policy research, and eligibility for state honours. Framed within the concept of constitutional repair, the article identifies key pathways for reform based on four interrelated aspects: specificity, feasibility, temporality, and priority. These reforms aim to strengthen the DPR’s capacity for oversight and restore its role as a democratic counterbalance to executive power.
Co-Authors Adhihernawan, Muhammad Yoppy Afnila Ali Abdurahman Atip Latipulhayat Bagir Manan Bagir Manan Bayu Aryanto Cynthia Hadita Franko Johner Giri Ahmad Taufik Hadita, Cynthia Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto Hatim, Ahmad Hernawan, Muhammad Yoppy Adhi Ilham Fajar Septian Ilham Fajar Septian Indra Perwira Indra Perwira, Indra Jamaluddin, Muhammad Nur Jhoner, Franko Lailani Sungkar Manan, Firman Mei Susanto Muhammad Yoppy Adhihermawan Putrida Sihombing Rahayu Prasetianingsih Sisinaru, Sostones Y T. Keizerina Devi Azwar