Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Raising Legal Awareness in MSME Trade: Protecting and Registering Trademarks Siagian, Putri Rumondang; Desiandri, Yati Sharfina; Saidin, Saidin; Shauqi, Saddam; Wau, Hilbertus Sumplisius M.; Azwar, T. Keizerina Devi
Nagari Law Review Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.9.i.1.p.101-110.2025

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) as small-scale industries tend to ignore the importance of intellectual property protection, particularly evident in the minimal registration of MSME trademarks with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property. Although the World Intellectual Property Rights (WIPO) recognizes the potential of MSMEs to drive product innovation and creativity, MSME awareness of the use of Intellectual Property Rights remains low. This study uses a normative legal research method, focusing on the study of legal provisions related to MSME trademark registration and protection. A descriptive analytical approach is used to identify and resolve existing legal issues, with reference to relevant laws and regulations. Trademark registration is considered the basis for rejecting similar trademarks filed by other parties for similar goods or services. The "first to file" principle applies in Indonesia, which grants exclusive rights to the first registrant for 10 years. Efforts to increase MSME legal awareness of the importance of trademarks, particularly through registration, are crucial. Legal counseling can be an effective means to increase public understanding, by emphasizing the legal protection and legal certainty provided by trademark registration. The importance of legal counseling as a strategy to increase legal awareness among MSMEs in registering their trademarks needs to be considered. This awareness can ensure that MSMEs understand the importance of brands to their businesses and can manage them legally to maintain their protection. This study recommends the need for further provision and understanding through legal counseling to ensure better legal awareness among MSMEs.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN NARKOTIKA JENIS GANJA UNTUK KEPERLUAN MEDIS DI INDONESIA (Studi Putusan: No.111/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Sag) Widayanti, Yuyun; Yunara, Edi; Desiandri, Yati Sharfina
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i3.4239

Abstract

Abstrack: Marijuana is a class I narcotic, which according to several expert studies is a type of narcotic that can be used for medical purposes in Indonesia. Medical purposes using marijuana can be useful in treating several diseases that are classified as dangerous. The benefits of marijuana for medical purposes still cannot be used as a basis for licensing the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Based on Article 8 of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, the use of marijuana has been clearly prohibited in Indonesia. The prohibition on the use of marijuana for medical purposes can be seen from a decision, namely Decision Number: 111 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Sag which sentenced a defendant who had used marijuana as an alternative treatment for the defendant's wife who suffered from syringomylia. Based on this, the formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal regulations related to the use of marijuana as a medical substance in Indonesia, how the process of obtaining a permit for the use of marijuana as a medical need in Indonesia, and how the judge's considerations in applying criminal sanctions to the defendant in Decision Number: 111 / Pid.Sus / 2017PN.Sag. The method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method, namely analyzing legal principles carried out by literature studies. This research is descriptive, and the data analysis method used is qualitative descriptive research. The judge considered the defendant's humanitarian goals who used marijuana to treat his wife, then sentenced him to 8 months in prison and a fine of Rp1 billion, lighter than the minimum threat, as a means of education and development. This decision reflects an effort to balance the values of justice, certainty, and legal benefits as Gustav Radbruch's theory, by considering juridical, philosophical, and sociological aspects. Keyword: Judge's Ruling, Marijuana, Medical Purposes Abstrak: Narkotika jenis ganja ialah narkotika golongan I, yang menurut beberapa penelitian oleh ahli merupakan jenis narkotika yang dapat dimanfaatkan untuk keperluan medis di Indonesia. Keperluan medis dengan menggunakan narkotika jenis ganja, dapat bermanfaat dalam mengatasi beberapa penyakit yang tergolong berbahaya. Adanya manfaat narkotika jenis ganja untuk keperluan medis masih tidak dapat dijadikan dasar perizinan pengunaan narkotika jenis ganja untuk keperluan medis. Berdasarkan Pasal 8 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang narkotika, penggunaan narkotika jenis ganja telah dengan jelas dilarang penggunaannya di Indonesia. Larangan penggunaan narkotika jenis ganja dalam hal keperluan kesehatan, dapat dilihat dari adanya suatu putusan yaitu Putusan Nomor: 111/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Sag yang menjatuhkan hukuman terhadap seorang terdakwa yang telah menggunakan narkotika jenis ganja sebagai alternatif penyembuhan terhadap istri terdakwa yang mengalami penyakit syringomylia. Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka yang menjadi rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah pengaturan hukum terkait penggunaan narkotika jenis ganja sebagai bahan medis di Indonesia, bagaimana proses untuk memperoleh izin penggunaan narkotika jenis ganja sebagai kebutuhan medis di Indonesia, serta bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam menerapkan sanksi pidana terhadap terdakwa dalam Putusan Nomor: 111/Pid.Sus/2017PN.Sag. Metode yang digunakan di dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu menganalisis asas hukum yang dilakukan dengan studi pustaka. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif, dan metode analisa data yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. hakim mempertimbangkan tujuan kemanusiaan terdakwa yang menggunakan ganja untuk mengobati istrinya, lalu menjatuhkan pidana 8 bulan penjara dan denda Rp1 miliar, lebih ringan dari ancaman minimal, sebagai sarana edukasi dan pembinaan. Putusan ini mencerminkan upaya menyeimbangkan nilai keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan hukum sebagaimana teori Gustav Radbruch, dengan mempertimbangkan aspek yuridis, filosofis, dan sosiologis. Kata Kunci:     Putusan Hakim, Narkotika Jenis Ganja, Keperluan Medis