Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

TINJAUAN HUKUM PERSEPSI KONSUMEN TERHADAP LOGO HALAL YANG DITAMPILKAN PADA PRODUK MAKANAN BERMEREK Svinarky, Irene; Mashdurohatun, Anis; Endah Wahyuningsih, Sri; Latifah, Latifah
ANDREW Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): JUNI 2025
Publisher : ANDREW Law Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61876/alj.v4i1.68

Abstract

Penelitian ini memberikan gambaran pencantuman logo halal pada produk makanan terutama pada produk makanan yang telah terkenal mereknya. Presepsi masayarakat mengenai logo halal masih kurang, sehingga kedepannya juga memberikan pencerahan bagi pengusaha yang belum memahami mengenai aturan yang berkaitan pencantuman logo halal ini semakin tahu tujuannya untuk mendaftarkan produknya ke BPJPH. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yang melibatkan analisis terhadap peraturan-peraturan hukum dan konseptual. Sifat penelitian yang digunakan adalah Deskriptif yang mana mendeskripsikan aturan hukum yang diikuti dalam logo halal yang dicantumkan pada produk makanan bermerek. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, penelitian ini bermaksud untuk membahas mengenai yaitu Pertama, Di Indonesia karena mayoritas penduduk beragama Islam, maka diperlukan pendaftaran produk yang mau diedarkan ke masyarakat, tetapi produk yang mau didaftarkan memang tidak ada kandungan non halal di dalam produk tersebut maka si pengusaha silahkan mendaftarkan produknya ke BPJPH. Sebaliknya jika produk yang dijual pengusaha mengandung salah satu bahan atau semua bahan non halal, maka tidak perlu mendaftarkan makanannya ke BPJPH, tetapi cantumkan logo non halal di produknya. Kedua, Implikasi strategi pemasaran produk makanan di Indonesia diharapkan agar Prosedur pendaftaran logo halal di Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Produk Halal (BPJPH) di Indonesia pada tahun 2024 bagi produsen makanan melibatkan dapat memberikan kesadaran bagi para produsen atas kebutuhan konsumen terhadap kehalalan suatu produk yang mayoritas masyarakatnya beragama islam.
JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIJADIKAN JAMINAN KEMBALI DENGAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PENGHAPUSAN FIDUSIA MENURUT PRESPEKTIF HUKUM DI INDONESIA Situmeang, Rinal Efries; Svinarky, Irene; Simamora, Lisa
UNES Law Review Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v2i3.122

Abstract

Fiduciary is shift that did by fiduciary owner to fiduciary receiver, while for up object ability that present on object owner. Number law 42 Years 1999 about Fiduciary Surety or more recognized with UUJF is attributed to make and gives protection of the parties so fiduciary transactions to the fore also expected to qualify law on fiduciary. Fiduciary will erase if object that made by indemnity being paid off by its loan, while is fiduciary was placed to an object really being prohibited for fiduciary giver for vouch in as indemnity is back but a long cry intention of Section 17 UUJF with Section 23 sentences (2) UU JF . In Section 23 sentences (2 ) bear out one of rule it that object that becomes fiduciary indemnity can be shifted if get agreement in writing of fiduciary receiver but variably its thing with what does he meant on Section 25 sentences (1) UUJH. Section 25 sentences (1) UUJH where terminological its formulation that fiduciary indemnity delete because of that fiduciary indemnity is alone was demolish; then indemnity that is used for fiduciary was end its book debt; then fiduciary giver to fiduciary receiver; rights release on fiduciary indemnity by fiduciary receiver; and if goods that becomes fiduciary indemnity disappear therefore fiduciary will erase. Observational type that is used in this research is jurisdictional observational type normative. Fiduciary indemnity terminological UUJF bases Section 17 be borne out that: Information hits indemnity object as object that stills in fiduciary indemnity and still enrolled therefore fiduciary giver is prohibited to do fiduciary and Section 17 not if fiduciary receiver accept therefore get to make that indemnity as back indemnity without ask for fiduciary indemnity deletions as royal. To the effect to list that fiduciary back as surety of giving afters fiduciary fiduciary pays off that goods is subject to be not remove prefentif's rights divides fiduciary receiver.