Articles
<![CDATA[Isu Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penerapan Deportasi terhadap Tenaga Kerja Asing di Bali ]]>
<![CDATA[Arsika, I Made Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Satyawati, Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Purwani, Sagung Putri M E]]>
<![CDATA[ Pandecta: Research Law Journal Vol 11, No 1 (2016): Pandecta : Research Law Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Semarang State University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v11i1.5961
<![CDATA[Artikel ini bermaksud untuk menganalisis penghormatan, perlindungan, dan pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dalam pengaturan hukum keimigrasian mengenai tindakan deportasi terhadap Tenaga Kerja Asing (TKA) di Indonesia. Selain itu, artikel ini juga bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek-aspek yang perlu diperhatikan untuk menjamin bahwa tindakan deportasi yang dilakukan oleh pejabat keimigrasian tidak melanggar HAM yang dimiliki oleh TKA yang bekerja di Bali. Artikel ini didesain sebagai suatu penelitian hukum normatif yang meneliti bahan-bahan hukum yang berkaitan dengan isu deportasi dan TKA yang dipadukan dengan suatu metode penelitian HAM. This article intends to analyze the respect, the protection, and the fulfillment of human rights in the regulation of immigration law on of deportation measures imposed to foreign workers in Indonesia. In addition, it aims to analyze the aspects that need to be considered to ensure that the deportation measures taken by immigration officials would not violate human rights of the foreign workers who work in Bali. This article is designed as a normative legal research that examines the legal materials relating to the issue of deportation and foreign workers, combined with a human rights research method. ]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Travel Warning dan Pembatasan Hak Berwisata ]]>
<![CDATA[Arsika, I Made Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Jaya, Ida Bagus Surya Dharma]]>;
<![CDATA[Satyawati, Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah]]>
<![CDATA[ Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 13, No 1 (2018): June ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v13i1.15115
<![CDATA[Penerbitan travel warning oleh suatu negara secara faktual berdampak pada tingkat kunjungan wisata ke negara yang dituju. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mengenai praktik negara-negara, termasuk Indonesia, dalam menerapkan kebijakan travel warning. Selain itu, juga secara spesifik akan membahas korelasi antara kebijakan travel warning dengan eksistensi hak berwisata (right to tourism) dalam kerangka hak asasi manusia (HAM). Jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis-normatif yang utamanya menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan nasional Indonesia dan instrumen internasional yang relevan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik negara-negara dalam dalam penerbitan kebijakan travel warning menunjukkan variasi yang relatif beragam, terutama berkaitan dengan identifikasi risiko dan lembaga yang berwenang untuk menyampaikan imbauan perjalanan. Berkaitan dengan eksistensi hak berwisata (right to tourism) dalam kerangka HAM, kebijakan travel warning merupakan implementasi dari kewajiban negara untuk melindungi warga negaranya ketika mereka berada di luar negeri sekaligus merefleksikan tindakan negara untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak-hak mendasar warga negaranya. Adapun pembatasan hak berwisata oleh negara sesungguhnya dilakukan dalam rangka menjamin terpenuhinya jenis HAM lain yang jauh lebih mendasar dibandingkan dengan pemenuhan hak berwisata yang justru masih dikategorikan sebagai HAM generasi ketiga dan eksistensinya masih diperdebatkan.The publication of travel warning by a country factually impacts the level of tourist visit to the destination country. This study aims to analyze the practice of countries, including Indonesia, in applying travel warning policy. In addition, also specifically will discuss the correlation between travel warning policy with the existence of rights of travel (right to tourism) within the framework of human rights (HAM). This type of research is juridical-normative which primarily analyzes Indonesian national legislation and relevant international instruments. The results of this study indicate that the practice of countries in the issuance of travel warning policy shows a relatively diverse variety, mainly related to the identification of risks and institutions authorized to deliver travel appeals. In relation to the existence of the right of tourism within the human rights framework, the travel warning policy is the implementation of the state’s obligation to protect its citizens while abroad while reflecting the state’s actions to ensure the fulfillment of the fundamental rights of its citizens. The limitation of travel rights by the state is actually done in order to guarantee the fulfillment of other types of human rights that are far more fundamental than the fulfillment of travel rights that are still categorized as third-generation human rights and its existence is still disputed.]]>
<![CDATA[Isu Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penerapan Deportasi terhadap Tenaga Kerja Asing di Bali ]]>
<![CDATA[Arsika, I Made Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Satyawati, Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Purwani, Sagung Putri M E]]>
<![CDATA[ Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 11, No 1 (2016): June ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v11i1.5961
<![CDATA[Artikel ini bermaksud untuk menganalisis penghormatan, perlindungan, dan pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dalam pengaturan hukum keimigrasian mengenai tindakan deportasi terhadap Tenaga Kerja Asing (TKA) di Indonesia. Selain itu, artikel ini juga bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek-aspek yang perlu diperhatikan untuk menjamin bahwa tindakan deportasi yang dilakukan oleh pejabat keimigrasian tidak melanggar HAM yang dimiliki oleh TKA yang bekerja di Bali. Artikel ini didesain sebagai suatu penelitian hukum normatif yang meneliti bahan-bahan hukum yang berkaitan dengan isu deportasi dan TKA yang dipadukan dengan suatu metode penelitian HAM. This article intends to analyze the respect, the protection, and the fulfillment of human rights in the regulation of immigration law on of deportation measures imposed to foreign workers in Indonesia. In addition, it aims to analyze the aspects that need to be considered to ensure that the deportation measures taken by immigration officials would not violate human rights of the foreign workers who work in Bali. This article is designed as a normative legal research that examines the legal materials relating to the issue of deportation and foreign workers, combined with a human rights research method. ]]>
<![CDATA[ADVANCING ASEAN HUMAN RIGHTS NORMS THROUGH EXTERNAL RELATIONS: CAPACITY, ADVANTAGES, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EXTERNAL INTERFERENCE ]]>
<![CDATA[Arsika, I Made Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (207.176 KB)
<![CDATA[The gradual development of human rights norms in ASEAN has been discussed until recently. As before the human rights provisions were formally enshrined in the ASEAN Charter, many experts have shared their views on how such norms should ideally be formulated and how to use the institutional approach in the promotion and protection of human rights in Southeast Asia region.This paper mainly discusses about the role of ASEAN’s external relations to advance the ASEAN human rights norms. On the more specific topic, this paper analyzes ASEAN’s capacity to bring human rights agenda in its external relations and also analyzes the advantages that can be gained from such activities. Based on the assumption that cooperation naturally opens the room for external influences, this paper also studies whether ASEAN’s external relations on human rights issues are potential for external interference.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGATURAN MENGENAI KEWAJIBAN NOTARIS DALAM MELEKATKAN SIDIK JARI PENGHADAP PADA MINUTA AKTA NOTARIS TERKAIT DENGAN PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Rengganis Dita Ragiliana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 02, No. 06, Oktober 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (197.331 KB)
<![CDATA[This paper aims to determine the obligations of a notary in client fingerprintembedding on the official document to law office amendement of notary and sanction aregiven if the notary does not perform its obligation. This paper is a normative legal researchby using statutes approach. The Amendment of Notary Act No.2 in 2014, especially inArticle 16 paragraph (1) letter c determines obligation for the notary in making a notarialminuta. The functions of reattached fingerprint in the notarial minuta is not a legal actionto determine the validity or authenticity of the minuta but only to ensure the correct identityof client. Notaries are responsible to carry out these obligations in their profession as apublic notary, otherwise they will be imposed disciplinary sanction, except in the event of adeclaration stating the reason client cannot affix signatures and fingerprints on the officialdocument.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI INVENTOR PICK UP GITAR ELEKTRIK DAN SANKSI TERHADAP PENDUPLIKASIAN INVENSINYA ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Alvian Prasetya Putera]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 02, No. 03, Juni 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (52.932 KB)
<![CDATA[Patent occurs in various fields of industry in the form of technology. One of the industries that are the music industry. The technology developed in this music industry is Pick Up Electric Guitar. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the legal protection for the inventor pick up the electric guitar itself and how the sanctions for another party or actors that attempt to duplicate pick up the electric guitar itself. Seen from the object, this paper uses the research methods of approach Normative Law legislation. The sources of law derived from the legal and law books. The conclusion, that all forms of protection against dam inventor sanctions for businesses that duplication pick up the electric guitar set in the the Patent Act.]]>
<![CDATA[PERBANDINGAN TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1995 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS ]]>
<![CDATA[Ida Ayu Ima Purnama Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 02, No. 06, Oktober 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (101.397 KB)
<![CDATA[This journal entitled "Comparison of Board of Directors Responsibilities Underthe Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company or hereinafter calledCompany Law of 2007 with the Law Number 1 of 1995 on Limited Liability Companyor hereinafter called Company Law of 1995". This journal addresses the problem ofhow the Board of Directors' responsibility reviewed based on the Company Law of 2007compared to the Company Law of 1995. It is a normative legal research that uses acomparative approach. The conclusion of the writing of this journal is that regarding tothe responsibility of Board of Directors, which now regulated by Company Law of2007, as originally stipulated on Company Law of 1995 turned out to have nosignificant differences. It is just that some of the articles provided in the Company Lawof 2007 give further clarify and expand the responsibilities of the Board of Directorsthan those mentioned in the previous Limited Liability Company Law of 1995.]]>
<![CDATA[PERANAN BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH BALI DALAM MENERAPKAN PRINSIP KERAHASIAAN BANK SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP NASABAH ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Hadi Kusuma]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (33.719 KB)
<![CDATA[Dalam penulisan karya ilmiah yang berjudul “Peranan Bank Pembangunan Daerah (BPD) Bali Dalam Menerapkan Prinsip Kerahasiaan Bank Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Nasabah”, menggunakan metode penelitian empiris. Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah bagaimana peranan BPD Bali dalam melindungi kerahasiaan nasabah terkait prinsipkerahasiaan bank dan bagaimana sanksi yang diterima terhadap bank apabila membuka rahasia mengenai nasabahnya. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, diperoleh hasil bahwa BPD Bali akan sangat merahasiakan hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan nasabah dan kegiatankegiatan di dalamnya, kecuali untuk kepentingan-kepentingan hukum. Sanksi apabila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan rahasia bank yakni sesuai dengan yang telah ditentukan undang-undang adalah sanksi pidana dan dapat pula dikenakan sanksi perdata maupun administratif.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM NASABAH PEMEGANG KARTU KREDIT TERHADAP ADANYA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DEBT COLLECTOR ]]>
<![CDATA[Amalia Kurniawan]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 02, No. 06, Oktober 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (171.306 KB)
<![CDATA[This paper discusses the consumptive use of credit card that ultimately led to theinability of credit card holders to pay the debt, that makes banks have to use debtcollector service to collect the debt. It aims to identify the legal protection of credit cardcustomers from any actions taken by debt collectors and also to analyze theresponsibility of debt collectors for their actions. It is a normative legal research thatuses statutory and analitical-conseptual approaches. It can be concluded that the creditcard holders are given legal protection from the Regulation of Bank Indonesia (CentralBank). In case loss of credit card holders, both banks and debt collectors have differentresponsibility. More specifically, the bank is responsible to provide compensation in theform of a sum of money to the customer, meanwhile, debt collectors will be imposedcriminal responsibility for their actions.]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB KREDITOR ATAS HILANGNYA BARANG GADAI ]]>
<![CDATA[Amalia Yustika Febriani]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 02, No. 06, Oktober 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (171.301 KB)
<![CDATA[The title of this article is the responsibility of creditor for the loss of pawninggoods. It is a normative legal research that uses a statutory approach. The writeranalyzed that pawning agreement arises from the legal relation of mortgage agreementthat its repayment will be guaranteed by moving objects. In this regards, creditor shallbe liable to the pawn objects that lost or damaged, as stipulated in Article 157paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Civil Code, except for the case of force majeure.]]>
