Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.592
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Rechtsidee Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Akta Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jambura Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Afifah Kusumadara
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Perlindungan Program Komputer Menurut Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Kusumadara, Afifah
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 33, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Kedudukan Hukum Sebagai Alat Pembangunan Ekonomi Di Era Reformasi Kusumadara, Afifah
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 40, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Legal Pluralism and The Dual Status of Catholic Divorce in Indonesia: Reformulating an Integrative Church Mediation Model for Harmonizing Civil and Canonical Jurisdictions Diva Yulia Amanda; Afifah Kusumadara; Suhariningsih Suhariningsih
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i2.53063

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dualism of divorce status experienced by Catholics in Indonesia as a consequence of the normative conflict between national marriage law and Catholic Canon Law, as well as to formulate an integrative mediation model through Church institutions as a mechanism for harmonizing the two legal regimes. Existing studies have primarily focused on descriptive analyses of the relationship between state law and religious law, while limited attention has been devoted to procedural mechanisms capable of harmonizing conflicting civil and ecclesiastical jurisdictions. This normative legal research employs both statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis is conducted through the examination of primary legal materials, including Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, and the Code of Canon Law, supported by secondary legal materials from scholarly literature. Legal materials are analyzed using systematic and interdisciplinary interpretation methods. The findings reveal that the coexistence of civil divorce recognition under Article 38 of the Marriage Law and the principle of the absolute indissolubility of marriage under Canon 1141 generates a condition of legal dualism that reflects the characteristics of weak legal pluralism. This dualism gives rise to substantive legal uncertainty, ambiguity in personal status, restrictions on the civil right to remarry, and limitations on the exercise of religious rights within the Catholic Church. Consequently, the legal certainty provided by civil courts remains merely formal and administrative, without resolving the broader religious and social implications faced by Catholic divorcees. The novelty of this study lies in proposing an Integrative Church Mediation Model as a procedural harmonization mechanism that has not been comprehensively discussed in previous scholarship. The proposed model offers practical implications for judicial institutions, policymakers, and Church authorities in addressing legal uncertainty within Indonesia’s pluralistic legal system. The study concludes that a holistic procedural reconstruction is necessary through the adoption of an Integrative Church Mediation Model as a pre-litigation mechanism capable of harmonizing civil and ecclesiastical jurisdictions, thereby ensuring greater legal certainty, justice, and protection for Catholics in a pluralistic legal system.
Penghapusan Merek Terdaftar yang Tidak Aktif dalam Perspektif Teori Kesejahteraan Menurut Jeremy Bentham Masfufah Masfufah; Afifah Kusumadara; Yenny Eta Widyanti
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2024): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2024.V18.173-190

Abstract

Trademarks play a vital role in modern trade, but in Indonesia, there is a normative conflict in Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications between Article 74 Paragraph (1) and Article 35 Paragraph (1). How can a registered trademark be removed even though it is still within the protection period? The research method used is normative juridical with statutory, comparative, and case study approaches, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed descriptively. This research aims to analyze whether the provisions for the removal of registered trademarks in Indonesia uphold the principles of justice and legal certainty by emphasizing Jeremy Bentham’s welfare theory, in order to achieve appropriate regulations and harmonization between conflicting provisions. The results findings that the provision for removal registered trademarks are unfair and harmful to registered trademarks owners, as they disregard the principles of justice and legal certainty. Therefore, it is necessary to make a statement of the use of registered trademarks by the registered trademarks owner that is facilitated by the DJKI before the 10 year period so that there is harmonization between the conflicting provisions. The implementation of this solution is expected to provide legal certainty, encourage active use of trademarks, and support sustainable economic growth.
Co-Authors Airin Liemanto Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial AYU RAHMAWATI Devy Monica Dhia Al-Uyun Dian Ayu Nurul Muthoharoh Diva Yulia Amanda Djumikasih Dwi Budi Santoso Elmaila, Izzah Endang Sri Kawuryan Fadli, Moh. Gerry Geovant Supranata Kaban Giovani Anggasta Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Hayati, Asna Nurul I Gusti Kade Prabawa Maha Yoga M. Hamidi Masykur, M. Hamidi Masfufah Masfufah Masfufah Masfufah, Masfufah Mohamad Rivaldi Moha MUFIDAH, LAILATUL Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif Putri, Sekar Rizqi Triroosa Rachmi Sulistyarini Rahmat Sjafi’i, R. Imam Serafim, Gladysta Viola Sjafi'i, R. Imam Rahmat Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Sukarmi Sukarmi ul-Haq, Hayyan Widaqdo, Setyo Yenny Eta Widyanti Yuliati Yuliati