Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI ANAK OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM SUATU PUTUSAN PERCERAIAN Rai Mantili
Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang Vol 20 No 2 (2022): Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37090/keadilan.v20i2.725

Abstract

Execution as a legal action taken by the court to the losing party in a case is a further rule and procedure of the case examination process. Execution or execution of a decision is an act carried out by force against the losing party in a case. Not all court decisions have executive power, not all court decisions can be executed. In a divorce case in the Religious Courts, if the judge has given a decision that one of the parties has been won as the holder of custody, then the party who must voluntarily hand over his custody rights to the winning party voluntarily. This is a lot in practice, often parties who do not want to give up custody of their children to the winning party. The results of this study indicate that the execution of child custody has two kinds of obstacles. The first obstacle is the "psychological obstacle of the child", because the child is not an object that can be executed and the second obstacle is a matter of cost, if the child is on the losing side but the losing party does not want to give up custody of the child to the winning party, who will will pay a fee if requesting the services of the police to force the child, because there is no state budget for the execution of child custody. Keywords: Divorce, religious courts, execution of children.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Melalui Mediasi Adat Dalihan Natolu Camalia, Tamarine; Kusmayanti, Hazar; Mantili, Rai
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Vol 4, No 3 (2024): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2294

Abstract

Introduction: The principle of Dalihan Natolu regulates three important aspects of vertical relationships between descendants, horizontal relationships between siblings, and relationships with the wider community. Dalihan Natolu reflects three important pillars, namely Hula-hula (in-laws), Dongan Sabutuha (brothers), and Boru (daughters).Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of this article is to the settlement of inheritance disputes can be pursued through customary mediation using the Dalihan Natolu customary principle.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research, namely legal research to examine a norm, principle and/or legal doctrine.Results of the Research: The results of the research obtained are as follows: First, the process of resolving inheritance disputes through Dalihan Natolu customary mediation emphasizes the value of deliberation and local wisdom. In practice, Dalihan Natolu functions as a mediator who creates conducive dialog conditions between the disputing parties, involving three important elements: Hula-hula, Dongan Sabutuha, and Boru. Second, the legal position of the Dalihan Natolu customary mediation decision in inheritance disputes has an important role both socially and culturally. Although this mediation decision does not have formal legal force, it is respected by indigenous people and serves as a strong moral basis.
Gugatan Pengingkaran Anak oleh Ibu dalam Putusan Nomor 549/Pdt.G/2024/Pa.Kab.Kdr Ditinjau dari Hukum Positif di Indonesia Nugraha, Janine Marieta Ajesha; Mantili, Rai; Rubiati, Betty
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15650636

Abstract

Pengingkaran Anak merupakan tindakan hukum untuk menyangkal status seorang anak sebagai anak sah dari seorang ayah karena ada dugaan bahwa anak tersebut bukan hasil hubungan biologis antara suami dan istri dalam perkawinan. Skripsi ini membahas tentang gugatan pengingkaran anak oleh ibu dalam Putusan Nomor 1549/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Kab.Kdr dan meninjau kedudukannya dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis kekuatan hukum tes DNA sebagai alat bukti dalam perkara pengingkaran anak serta menelaah kedudukan hukum ibu sebagai pihak penggugat. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kenyataan bahwa hukum di Indonesia, baik dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan maupun Kompilasi Hukum Islam, pada umumnya hanya mengatur hak pengingkaran anak oleh suami. Metode penelitian dalam skripsi ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan menganalisis putusan pengadilan, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta literatur hukum lainnya untuk mengkaji putusan yang menjadi objek penelitian. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif-analitis, dengan tujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menguraikan permasalahan berdasarkan data yang diperoleh. Selain itu, metode wawancara juga dimanfaatkan sebagai teknik pengumpulan data pendukung. Dari hasil penelitian, ditemukan bahwa hasil tes DNA memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang kuat dalam membuktikan hubungan biologis antara anak dan ayah kandung. Namun, gugatan yang diajukan oleh ibu berpotensi mengandung cacat hukum berupa error in persona karena tidak diakomodasi secara eksplisit dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai pihak yang berwenang mengajukan pengingkaran anak. Oleh karena itu, perlu ada pembaharuan hukum yang lebih responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi dan perlindungan hak anak
Batas Kewenangan Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris dalam Pengelolaan Perusahaan Berkaitan dengan Dicabutnya Izin Usaha Pertambangan: Studi Kasus Putusan No.3/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg Santika, Charisa Dwi; Suryanti, Nyulistiowati; Mantili, Rai
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v2i4.1413

Abstract

The limits of authority among the company’s organs in corporate management are expressly regulated under the UUPT, which assigns managerial and representative functions to the Board of Directors, supervisory and advisory functions to the Board of Commissioners, and control functions to the General Meeting of Shareholders. In practice, these authorities are often not implemented effectively, resulting in various violations. Such violations do not always arise from ultra vires acts but may also stem from negligence in exercising the granted authority. Improper management, administrative omissions, and passive supervision contribute to the risk of loss upon revocation of a mining business license. The absence of a valid license removes the company’s legal basis for operating and triggers potential liability for he organs that were negligent. This research employs a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical specification. Data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through literature review and case study of Decision No. 3/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Mgg. Directors must distinguish between beheer and beschikking actions when determining the scope of corporate management. Meanwhile, the Board of Commissioners is obligated to conduct supervision and provide advice proactively, whether requested or not, as a manifestation of good faith.