Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus

KORELASI HUKUM DOCUMENT ON HUMAN FRATERNITY FOR WORLD PEACE AND LIVING TOGETHER DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA Michael, Tomy
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Februari 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (168.015 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v2i2.2178

Abstract

Document on Human Fraternity menjadi sangat penting karena didalamnya mengatur secara tegas apa hakikat Tuhan. Pentingnya pemahaman akan Tuhan akan menjadikan suatu peraturan perundang-undangan mengarah pada keadilan hukum. Di dalam Undang-UndangRepublik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (UU No. 12-2011) bahwa tiap peraturan perundang-undangan wajib ada frasa “Dengan Rahmat Tuhan Yang Maha Esa”. Document on Human Fraternity dapat dijadikan sebagai bagian dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Document on Human Fraternity merupakan norma desiderata yang universal
THE INHIBITED CONDITIONS IN THE DRAFT REGULATION OF SURABAYA MAYOR ABOUT THE PROCEDURE OF CHOOSING THE MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT OF VILLAGE INSTITUTION, CITIZEN ASSOCIATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Michael, Tomy
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Agustus 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (180.735 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v2i2.2510

Abstract

A person in legal studies can be referred to as a legal subject because he commits the rights and obligations relating to certain matters. As in the early part of Surabaya mayor's draft regulation about the procedures of choosing the Board of Community Empowerment Institution of Local Village Village Institution, Citizen Association and the Neighborhood Association (draft regulation of surabaya’s mayor) that in order to regulate the relationship between Surabaya government with Community Empowerment Institution (LPMK), Citizen Association (RW and the Neighborhood Association (RT) as partners in the implementation of development in the city of Surabaya, the government of Surabaya has established the Mayor’s regulation No. 38 year 2016 on implementation of the Surabaya City Regulation number 15 year 2003 about the guidelines for forming the organization of resilience community of Kelurahan Institutions, RW and RT who are about to organize the electoral ordinances Management of LPMK, RW and RT. The draft of Surabaya’s Mayor regulation before it was confirmed was conducted socialization by the law of the secretariat of Surabaya area in Surabaya on 19 March 2019. This activity has been in accordance with Act No. 12-2011 where the socialization of the first to know the aspirations of the public in this case stakeholders related to the draft Perwali Surabaya. Article 21 of Act No. 25-2009 shows the purpose of a legal state relating to the so-called task of managing and organizing tasks. Related to the government in the modern state, Spelt and ten Berge, distinguishes them in the tasks of regulating and managing the tasks (ordenende en verzorgende taken).
PENUNTUTAN GANTI RUGI KEHILANGAN BENDA ATAU BARANG TERHADAP PENGELOLA PARKIR YANG BERLINDUNG DI BAWAH KLAUSA BAKU Ardiyanto, Fahmi; Raissa, Amanda; Michael, Tomy
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Februari 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (191.42 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v3i1.2947

Abstract

For Those who have lost their vehicles or valuables in the vehicle, they can request compensation from the parking operator, the requsted goods or the vehicle has been handed over to the parking entrepreneur. But not a few of the parking entrepreneurs who take refuge under a raw clause if there are consumers who complain about the goods or vehicles that are deposited lost. Based on the decision of the Supreme Court (MA) included in the review decision (PK) dated April 21, 2010 each service provider is obliged to replace the vehicle added with additional money for the lost vehicle. This decisión is accordance with the requested PK case PK 124 PD/PDT/2007 by secure parking. According to articles 1366 and 1367 of the Civil Code every person who is surrendered is obliged to be responsible for goods thet have been Surrendered, while standart clause is regulated in article 18 of law No. 8 of 1999 concering consumers, buyers of standard clauses benefit one party. Therefore, theresercher is interested in studying the problem of claiming compensation for goods or goods to the parking operator sheltering under a standard clause.Seseorang yang kehilangan kendaraan atau barang-barang berharga yang ada  di kendaraan dapat menuntut ganti rugi terhadap pengusaha parkir, apalagi barang atau kendaraan tersebut sudah di berikan penyerahan kekuasaan pada pengusaha parkir. Namun tidak sedikit dari pengusaha parkir yang berlindung di bawah klausa baku jika ada konsumen yang mengomplain atas barang atau kendaraan yang dititipkannya hilang. Berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Agung (MA) yang tercantum dalam putusan peninjuan kembali (PK) tertanggal 21 April 2010 bahwa setiap penyedia layanan parkir wajib mengganti kendaraan yang hilang dengan sejumlah uang senilai kendaraan yang hilang. Putusan ini berdasarkan permohonan PK perkara 124 PK/PDT/2007 yang diajukan oleh secure parking. Menurut Pasal 1366 dan 1367 KUHPerdata setiap orang yang di penyerahan kekuasaan wajib bertanggung jawab atas barang yang telah dipasrahkan, sedangkan klausa baku diatur dalam pasal 18 Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, apabila klausa baku yang tercantum dalam satu dokumen lebih menguntungkan satu pihak. Oleh karena itu penulis akan mengkaji masalah penuntutan ganti rugi benda atau barang terhadap pengusaha parkir yang berlindung di bawah paying klausa baku.
NEGARA DAN EKSISTENSINYA DALAM PRIVASI SUBJEK HUKUM Michael, Tomy; Boerhan, Soebagio
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Agustus 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (176.792 KB) | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v3i2.3414

Abstract

AbstractAs a constitutional state as stated in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945 Constitution), everything must refer to the law. But is the nature of the reference likely to lead the country to act behind the law? With the perspective of a modern legal state, where a private is separated from the state. The private sector cannot be claimed as part of the state because of its limited nature. Private is the smallest right that a human has to maintain his life.Keywords: state; subjectAbstrakSebagai negara hukum seperti yang tercantum dalam Pasal 1 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945) maka segala sesuatunya harus mengacu pada hukum. Namun sifat mengacunya apakah cenderung mengarahkan negara bertindak dibalik hukum? Dengan perspektif negara hukum modern, dimana suatu yang privat dipisahkan dari negara. Privat tidak bisa diklaim sebagai bagian dari negara karena sifatnya yang terbatas. Privat merupakan hak terkecil yang dimiliki seorang manusia untuk mempertahankan kehidupannya.Kata kunci: negara; subjek