Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.171
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ushuluddin Kalimah Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Jurnal Terapan Abdimas Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi DHARMASMRTI: Jurnal Pascasarjana UNHI TSAQAFAH Sutasoma : Jurnal Sastra Jawa Abrahamic Religions: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Civil Officium: Journal of Empirical Studies on Social Science SWARNA Abdimas Mandalika SWARNA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JHESS: Journal Hub for Humanities and Social Science Al Naqdu: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman
M. Kharis Majid
Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Validity of the Word of God in the Bible According to Karl Barth: An Analytical Study Awaludin, Asep; Majid, M. Kharis; Churriyah, Churriyah
Abrahamic Religions: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Studi Agama-Agama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/arj.v6i1.32196

Abstract

This study discusses the background of the theological polemic concerning the authority of the Bible, which is simultaneously viewed as the highest divinely inspired text and a human document containing internal contradictions and historical inconsistencies. This study aims to analyse the influential perspective of Swiss theologian Karl Barth as a resolution to this tension. Its main objectives are to investigate Barth's conceptualisation of the polemic surrounding biblical truth and to examine his critique of biblical inerrancy. This study uses a qualitative method with a theological approach, conducting a systematic literature review of Barth's major works, academic journals, and related documentation. The results show that Barth affirms the Bible not as the perfect and direct Word of God, but as a fallible human ‘witness’ to the true Word, Jesus Christ. This study concludes that Barth's position avoids rejecting the Bible by affirming that the text becomes the Word of God dynamically through divine-human encounters, rather than having static inerrancy. The specific theological contribution of this research, in addition to the existing scholarship, is the articulation of Barth's dialectical framework as a powerful ‘third way’ that transcends the impasse between fundamentalist literalism and liberal revisionism, thereby promoting a coherent understanding of the sacredness of scripture in contemporary Christianity
Co-Authors Abdullah Muslich Rizal Maulana Adi Purnomo Afiyatin Nur Izzah Asep Awaludin Asep Awaludin, Asep Az Zuhroh, Talia Azmi Putri Ayu Wardani Churriyah, Churriyah Farhah, Farhah Hasbi Arijal Hasbi Arijal, Hasbi Hifdzi Syahril Mawardi Hubbana Ya Muji Bassailin Izzah, Afiyatin Nur Junana, Olivia Fiestha Karina Salwa Fawnia Kholid Karomi Kurnia, Farhana Ovista M. Adib Fuadi Nuriz M. Adib Fuadi Nuriz M. Nurrosyid Huda Setiawan Maulida Hasyyah Sabrina Muhammad Nurrosyid Huda Setiawan Muttaqin Muttaqin * Muttaqin Muttaqin Nasywadina, Nyiar Nugraheni, Arfita Maula Nur Ainuzzhuro Nurmala Indah Prayogo, Tonny Ilham Rahmat Kausar Salamah Noorhidayati Salsabila Setyo, Dito Sujiat Zubaidi Tamara Ajwa Salsabila Tistigar Sansayto Tonny Ilham Prayogo Umi Mahmudah Winda Roini Yahya, Yuangga Kurnia Yusril, Raden