Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Administrasi Publik Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam Struktur Birokrasi Desentralisasi dan Pelayanan Publik Imam Haromain; Aminullah Aminullah
Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/komunikasi.v3i1.900

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare public administration systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on bureaucratic structure, decentralization mechanisms, and public service delivery. Using a qualitative approach through literature review, this research examines scholarly articles, policy documents, and relevant regulations published in recent years. The findings show that Indonesia adopts a hierarchical and relatively centralized bureaucratic structure within a decentralized unitary state framework, while the United States applies a federal system that grants constitutionally guaranteed autonomy to state governments. Decentralization in Indonesia emphasizes administrative and political authority transfer to local governments to improve service responsiveness, although challenges such as overlapping authority and uneven institutional capacity persist. In contrast, federalism in the United States enables flexible and innovative public service provision but also creates disparities among states. The study further reveals that public service effectiveness and responsiveness in both countries are influenced by bureaucratic capacity, coordination mechanisms, and digital governance implementation. This comparative analysis provides insights for policymakers to strengthen bureaucratic reform, improve intergovernmental coordination, and enhance public service quality in accordance with national governance contexts.
Perbandingan PerekembanganAdministrasi Publik di Australia dan Indonesia dalam E-Goverment Eka Prastyo; Aminullah Aminullah
Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/komunikasi.v3i1.901

Abstract

The development of e-Government has become a key strategy in modernizing public administration in various countries, including Australia and Indonesia. The application of information and communication technology in government administration aims to improve bureaucratic efficiency, the quality of public services, and realize the principles of good governance. This study aims to analyze and compare the development of public administration in the implementation of e-Government in Australia and Indonesia. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a literature review of relevant and accessible scientific journals, academic books, and policy documents. The results show that Australia has a higher level of e-Government maturity, characterized by good digital service integration, infrastructure readiness, and adequate human resource capacity. Meanwhile, Indonesia has shown significant progress through the implementation of the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE), but still faces challenges such as infrastructure gaps, limited apparatus competency, and fragmented service systems. This research is expected to contribute concepts to the development of e-Government policies and public administration reform in Indonesia.  
PERSEPSI AWAL MAHASISWA TERKAIT MATA KULIAH MATEMATIKA: Students' Initial Perception Regarding Mathematics Courses Aminullah Aminullah; Siti Solihun
PESOLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Amin Qalbu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59896/pesolah.v1i1.154

Abstract

Mathematics is one of the courses that is identical to numbers or calculations, so it is a concern for government science students whose background is social sciences and humanities. The purpose of this study is to describe the perceptions of students of the Government Science Study Program regarding mathematics courses. The research method used in this study is a survey with a quantitative descriptive approach and data analysis using descriptive statistics. The results of the study show that the initial perception of students of the government science study program regarding mathematics courses predominantly states that mathematics is not easy or difficult with a percentage of 49.58%. The initial perception that states it is very not easy or very difficult is 30.83%. While no one has an initial perception that mathematics is very easy. Only 5.42% have the perception that mathematics is easy and 14.17% have the perception that the level of ease of mathematics courses is moderate.