Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science

Collaborative Governance Process in Supporting Public Private Partnership in Singkawang Airport Development in 2023-2024 Novita Sari, Maya; Alamsah Deliarnoor, Nandang; Indrawati Sagita, Novie
Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (Febru
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3946

Abstract

This research is driven by the inadequacies in the collaborative process within the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme, which has hindered the operationalization of Singkawang Airport, despite its inauguration by the President of Indonesia on March 20, 2024. The collaboration involves key actors, including the Central Government through the Ministry of Transportation, the Singkawang City Government, PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia, CSR Team and the local community surrounding the airport construction site. Adopting the cross-sector collaboration framework proposed by Bryson, Crosby, and Stone, this study aims to analyze and elucidate the Collaborative Governance process in the development of Singkawang Airport by examining six dimensions: forging initial agreements, building leadership, building legitimacy, building trust, managing conflict, and planning. This study employs a qualitative research method, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Informants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. The findings reveal that the Collaborative Governance process in the PPP scheme for Singkawang Airport is partially evident across the six dimensions. The first dimension, forging initial agreements, highlights the absence of formal agreements underpinning the collaboration. The second dimension, building leadership, demonstrates the presence of both formal and informal leadership structures. In the third dimension, building legitimacy, both internal and external legitimacy have been established. The fourth dimension, building trust, reveals that trust-building efforts are limited to periodic meetings conducted several months apart. The fifth dimension, managing conflict, shows a lack of preventive measures necessary to sustain trust. Finally, the sixth dimension, planning, indicates that while initial plans were formulated, they required dynamic adjustments to address emergent challenges during implementation. In conclusion, this study underscores that relying solely on the PPP scheme poses significant challenges to the realization of the airport project. Cross-sector collaboration has accelerated the development process but remains suboptimal, as it does not fully address the six dimensions of effective collaboration.
Evaluation of Innovation Ideas Competition in an Efforts to Improve Regional Innovation Index in Singkawang City Br Barus, Lidya Yuninda; Sagita, Novie Indrawati
Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (Augus
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.5049

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the extent to which the Innovation Idea Competition Program has effectively generated curated, feasible, and impactful ideas that address strategic regional issues, leverage local potential, meet community needs, and contribute meaningfully to the assessment of the Regional Innovation Index. The evaluation employs William N. Dunn’s six policy evaluation criteria as the analytical framework to provide insights for future program enhancement. A descriptive qualitative research method was employed, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Informants were selected using purposive sampling techniques to ensure relevance and depth. The findings reveal that, in terms of effectiveness, the program has had limited success in contributing to Regional Innovation Index reporting, with only 38.2% of implemented ideas being reflected in the index, although it has successfully fostered idea generation across various sectors (188 ideas over four years). Budgetary efficiency remains suboptimal, although human resource utilization is deemed adequate due to the commitment of the Regional Development Planning Agency team. Adequacy is also lacking, as the majority of ideas do not sufficiently address core strategic issues. Equity needs to be reinforced, as public engagement in the evaluation process remains minimal despite open access. The program's responsiveness is categorized as "developing," indicating that while many ideas have emerged, they are not yet fully integrated into formal planning processes. Conversely, the accuracy of the program is considered relatively strong in terms of conceptual design, implementation, and policy alignment.