Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : jurnal niara

Kedudukan Kuitansi Dalam Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Melalui Putusan Verstek Roza, Widya; Yasniwati; Devianty Fitri
Jurnal Niara Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : FAKULTAS ILMU ADMINISTRASI UNIVERSITAS LANCANG KUNING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/377wdk56

Abstract

The use of receipts as the primary means of evidence in land sale transactions remains prevalent due to practical considerations, low costs, and trust-based relationships, especially within familial or local community contexts. Legal complications arise when such transactions are not supported by an authentic deed from a Land Deed Official (PPAT), relying instead on a unilateral acknowledgment in the form of a private receipt. The issue becomes increasingly complex when adjudicated through a default judgment (verstek), as in Decision No. 2/Pdt.G/2022/PN Nab, in which the court accepted two receipts and the testimonies of witnesses who did not observe the transaction directly. This study examines the judicial considerations in assessing the probative value of receipts in default cases and evaluates the extent to which the principle of judicial prudence is applied. Employing a normative juridical method with a case study, statutory, and conceptual approach, the research adopts a descriptive-analytical framework based on library data. The findings indicate that a receipt, as a private unilateral document, carries limited evidentiary strength and attains full probative value only when acknowledged by the opposing party. Absent such acknowledgment, it constitutes merely preliminary evidence requiring corroboration. In default cases, the absence of the defendant cannot be interpreted as absolute admission, thus requiring the judge to rigorously and objectively evaluate all evidence presented. The study highlights the imperative of applying the principle of judicial prudence in default land sale cases to uphold legal certainty and safeguard the integrity of the evidentiary process
Konversi Utang PT Menjadi Saham Berdasarkan UU Kepailitan PKPU Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Rafi Muhammad Ave; Rembrant; Yasniwati
Jurnal Niara Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : FAKULTAS ILMU ADMINISTRASI UNIVERSITAS LANCANG KUNING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/08w4p646

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of debt-to-equity conversion in limited liability companies within the framework of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and examine the considerations of commercial court judges in ratifying peace plans through a case study of Commercial Court Decision Number: 497/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst involving PT. Waskita Beton Precast Tbk (WSBP). The research method employs a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical characteristics, utilizing secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through document study and library research. Data analysis techniques use qualitative methods through interpretation, conclusion drawing, and presentation in sentence form based on expert opinions and statutory regulations. Research results indicate that debt restructuring through debt-to-equity conversion is not specifically regulated in the Bankruptcy Law, making legal foundations rely solely on technical provisions such as Articles 222, 281 of the Bankruptcy Law, and Article 41 of the Company Law, which potentially conflict with business continuity and balance principles, particularly in the WSBP case that was under special monitoring by the Financial Services Authority yet still obtained homologation ratification that could potentially harm creditors