Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK ANAK DALAM SENGKETA HARTA BERSAMA Deni Kamaludin Yusup; Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 15, No 3 (2022): BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v15i3.536

ABSTRAK Harta bersama adalah harta yang diperoleh sepanjang perkawinan, dimulai sejak awal perkawinan hingga berakhirnya perkawinan. Proses pembagian harta bersama tersebut dilakukan sejak perkawinan berakhir, apakah disebabkan perceraian ataupun kematian salah satu pasangan. Aspek utama yang dipertimbangkan dalam pemeriksaan sengketa harta bersama hanya terkait waktu perolehan harta tanpa aspek lain di luar harta, seperti aspek kepentingan terbaik untuk anak. Hal ini berbeda dengan pemeriksaan harta bersama dalam Putusan Nomor 159 K/Ag/2018 jo. Putusan Nomor 6 PK/Ag/2019 yang juga mempertimbangkan aspek kepentingan anak. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara kualitatif literer menggunakan pendekatan kepustakaan, dengan merujuk kepada dokumen-dokumen atau literatur lain terkait perkara harta bersama dikonjungsikan dengan putusan yang dibahas. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa majelis hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 159 K/Ag/2018 jo. Putusan Nomor 6 PK/Ag/2019 telah melakukan ijtihad progresif dengan melakukan rechtsvinding perihal waktu pembagian harta bersama, dengan mempertimbangkan kepentingan terbaik untuk anak dan menunda proses pembagian harta bersama hingga mereka beranjak dewasa. Maka, gugatan harta bersama yang diajukannya harus dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Putusan ini merupakan salah satu putusan yang memberikan jaminan terhadap hak anak untuk mendapatkan perlindungan atas tempat tinggal layak. Putusan ini melahirkan kaidah hukum bahwa apabila gugatan harta bersama berpotensi menghalangi terwujudnya kepentingan terbaik bagi anak maka gugatan tersebut dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Kata kunci: harta bersama; gugatan; hak-hak anak; kepentingan terbaik anak. ABSTRACT Marital property refers to the property that a couple acquires during the course of marriage. The process of dividing the joint assets is carried out after the marriage is terminated, whether due to divorce or one of the spouses’ death. The main aspects considered in the examination of marital property disputes are only related to the time of acquiring the assets, without external aspects such as the best interests of the child. This is in contrast to the examination of joint assets in Decision Number 159 K/Ag/2018 and Decision Number 6 PK/Ag/2019, which takes into account aspects of the child’s interests. This analysis is a qualitative literary research approach, reviewing and exploring documents relevant to the decision in question. This study concluded that the panel of judges in Decision Number 159 K/Ag/2018 jo. Decision Number 6 PK/Ag/2019 has done a progressive ijtihad by carrying out rechtsvinding regarding the timing of sharing joint assets. The judge considers the best interests of the child by delaying the distribution of joint assets until they reach adulthood. Therefore, the marital property lawsuit has to be declared unacceptable. This was one of the decisions that ensured the child’s right to live in safety. This decision put forward the rule of law that if a marital property lawsuit has the potential to hinder the best interests of the child, it is declared unacceptable. Keywords: marital property; lawsuit; children’s rights; best interest of the child.

STANDARISASI KEBIJAKAN UPAH DAN PEMENUHAN HAK PEKERJA PEREMPUAN: TELAAH PERBANDINGAN HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF Ziaharah, Lena Ishelmiany; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin; Nasrudin, Nasrudin
VARIA HUKUM Vol 6, No 2 (2024): VARIA HUKUM
Publisher : Ilmu Hukum, Sharia and Law Faculty, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/vh.v6i2.41265

Abstract This study aims to analyze the review of Islamic Law and Positive Law on the standardization of wage policies and the fulfillment of women workers' rights based on two different legal frameworks. Under Islamic Law, women and men have equal rights and obligations before the law and emphasize the need for wages sufficient to meet the basic needs of workers and their families, regardless of gender. Whereas Positive Law focuses on protection and equality, the principle of equality between men and women, the prohibition against discrimination, and the establishment of minimum wage standards are positive legal efforts in protecting both male and female workers. This research is a type of qualitative research with a normative juridical approach. The technique used is library research. The results of the study show that, first, equality to obtain a similar level of wages is the right of all workers, including women workers, according to both Islamic Law and Positive Law; second, an understanding of the two different legal frameworks can contribute to the development of an inclusive and fair working environment for women workers. The novelty of this research lies in identifying specific elements of Islamic Law that can be integrated into favorable law regulations to create a more comprehensive and equitable wage policy and fulfillment of women workers' rights. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif terhadap standarisasi kebijakan upah dan pemenuhan hak pekerja perempuan berdasarkan dua kerangka hukum yang berbeda. Berdasarkan Hukum Islam, perempuan dan laki-laki memiliki hak dan kewajiban yang sama di hadapan hukum dan menekankan perlunya upah yang cukup untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dasar pekerja dan keluarganya, tanpa membedakan jenis kelamin. Sedangkan Hukum Positif berfokus pada perlindungan dan kesetaraan, di mana prinsip kesetaraan antara laki-laki dan perempuan, larangan terhadap diskriminasi dan penetapan standar upah minimum merupakan upaya hukum positif dalam melindungi pekerja baik laki-laki maupun perempuan. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Teknik yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan (library research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama: kesetaraan untuk mendapatkan tingkat upah yang serupa adalah hak semua pekerja, termasuk pekerja perempuan baik menurut Hukum Islam maupun Hukum Positif; kedua, pemahaman tentang kedua kerangka hukum yang berbeda dapat berkontribusi terhadap pembangunan lingkungan kerja yang inklusif dan adil bagi pekerja perempuan. Kebaharuan penelitian ini terletak pada identifikasi elemen-elemen spesifik dari Hukum Islam yang dapat diintegrasikan ke dalam regulasi hukum positif untuk menciptakan kebijakan upah dan pemenuhan hak pekerja perempuan yang lebih komprehensif dan berkeadilan.

The Implementation of the Principle of Profit Sharing of Mudharabah and Musyarakah in The Realm of Community Economic Development Suherli, Ian Rakhmawan; Ridwan, Ahmad Hasan; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin; Hakim, Sofyan Al; Muharni, Yusraini
Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah UNISBA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/amwaluna.v9i1.3357

This study investigates the implementation of the profit-sharing concept through mudharabah and musharakah contracts within the context of community economic growth in general. Library research methods are utilized to collect and analyze relevant literature, emphasising how these two contracts might help Muslims avoid the usury trap. The study's findings reveal that mudharabah and musharakah have become an important feature of Indonesia's Islamic financial system, helping to finance productive enterprises. Although there are obstacles to its adoption, such as a lack of public comprehension and insufficient rules, both contracts have the potential to boost economic welfare significantly. This study also emphasizes the role of Islamic scholars and financial organizations in creating and overseeing this practice to ensure that Sharia principles are not breached

Sharia Economic Law Criticism on Muhammad Syahrûr’s Hudûd Theory Regarding Bank Interes Eka Rahayu, Annisa; Kamaludin Yusup, Deni; Athoillah, Mohamad Anton; Hakim, Sofyan Al
Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah UNISBA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/amwaluna.v8i2.3949

n modern economics applied by conventional financial institutions, the interest system is inseparable. Economic system based on sharia principles emerged as a solution to riba-based (usury-based) transactional activities, which in sharia economic law is in the khilafiyyah (dissent) territory amongst scholars regarding whether the conventional bank interest is riba which is prohibited by Islamic law. A figure named Muhammad Syahrûr came up and offered his theory of limits (nazhariyyah al-hudûd) in providing riba limitations in the Quran. This research aims to describe M. Syahrûr's thoughts on bank interest based on his theory of limits, and to analyze it based on the review of sharia economic law (fiqh muamalah mâliyyah). this reseach is understood as a literary study research which is a research on secondary materials. The type of data used in this research is secondary data, which is literature focusing on the thoughts of a figure, which is Muhammad Syahrûr.The result of the research shows that Muhammad Syahrûr's opininion that allows the practice of bank interest based on his theory of limits (nazhariyyah al-hudûd) is a marjûh (weak) opinion, since it is not supported by valid arguments and it also contradicts the opinions of the jumhur ulama (the majority of the scholars).

STANDARISASI KEBIJAKAN UPAH DAN PEMENUHAN HAK PEKERJA PEREMPUAN: TELAAH PERBANDINGAN HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF Ziaharah, Lena Ishelmiany; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin; Nasrudin, Nasrudin
VARIA HUKUM Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan
Publisher : Ilmu Hukum, Sharia and Law Faculty, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/vh.v6i2.41265

Abstract This study aims to analyze the review of Islamic Law and Positive Law on the standardization of wage policies and the fulfillment of women workers' rights based on two different legal frameworks. Under Islamic Law, women and men have equal rights and obligations before the law and emphasize the need for wages sufficient to meet the basic needs of workers and their families, regardless of gender. Whereas Positive Law focuses on protection and equality, the principle of equality between men and women, the prohibition against discrimination, and the establishment of minimum wage standards are positive legal efforts in protecting both male and female workers. This research is a type of qualitative research with a normative juridical approach. The technique used is library research. The results of the study show that, first, equality to obtain a similar level of wages is the right of all workers, including women workers, according to both Islamic Law and Positive Law; second, an understanding of the two different legal frameworks can contribute to the development of an inclusive and fair working environment for women workers. The novelty of this research lies in identifying specific elements of Islamic Law that can be integrated into favorable law regulations to create a more comprehensive and equitable wage policy and fulfillment of women workers' rights. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif terhadap standarisasi kebijakan upah dan pemenuhan hak pekerja perempuan berdasarkan dua kerangka hukum yang berbeda. Berdasarkan Hukum Islam, perempuan dan laki-laki memiliki hak dan kewajiban yang sama di hadapan hukum dan menekankan perlunya upah yang cukup untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dasar pekerja dan keluarganya, tanpa membedakan jenis kelamin. Sedangkan Hukum Positif berfokus pada perlindungan dan kesetaraan, di mana prinsip kesetaraan antara laki-laki dan perempuan, larangan terhadap diskriminasi dan penetapan standar upah minimum merupakan upaya hukum positif dalam melindungi pekerja baik laki-laki maupun perempuan. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Teknik yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan (library research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama: kesetaraan untuk mendapatkan tingkat upah yang serupa adalah hak semua pekerja, termasuk pekerja perempuan baik menurut Hukum Islam maupun Hukum Positif; kedua, pemahaman tentang kedua kerangka hukum yang berbeda dapat berkontribusi terhadap pembangunan lingkungan kerja yang inklusif dan adil bagi pekerja perempuan. Kebaharuan penelitian ini terletak pada identifikasi elemen-elemen spesifik dari Hukum Islam yang dapat diintegrasikan ke dalam regulasi hukum positif untuk menciptakan kebijakan upah dan pemenuhan hak pekerja perempuan yang lebih komprehensif dan berkeadilan.

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA GUGATAN WAKAF MENURUT HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ISLAM Prayogi, Prayogi; Astarudin, Tatang; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i2.659

This research is motivated by the increasing number of waqf lawsuit dispute cases in Indonesia which shows that there is an insynchronization between positive legal practices and Islamic law principles, especially in terms of the status of waqf property and the rights of the parties. The purpose of this research is to analyze the mechanism of dispute resolution of waqf lawsuits according to the perspective of civil law and Islamic law and evaluate its effectiveness in providing justice and legal certainty. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive analysis method. Data was collected through a literature study that included laws and regulations related to waqf, MUI fatwas, legal literature, and relevant court decisions. The analysis is carried out qualitatively through content analysis to identify the basic principles and implementation of dispute resolution. The results of the study show that civil law provides litigation space through district courts, while Islamic law prioritizes non-litigation approaches such as deliberation-based mediation (sulh), settlement by nadzir, and settlement through religious courts. This study recommends the need for harmonization between the civil law system and Islamic law as well as strengthening the role of nadzir institutions and the Indonesian Waqf Agency (BWI) in resolving disputes fairly and efficiently.

Pengaturan Pengelolaan Tanah Sempadan Pantai Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam Suprihatno, Andri; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin; Astarudin, Tatang
Qanuniya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Qanuniya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/qanuniya.v2i1.1618

Tanah sempadan pantai memiliki nilai strategis dari aspek ekologis, sosial, dan ekonomi, namun pengelolaannya di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai persoalan hukum akibat tumpang tindih regulasi dan konflik kepentingan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara komparatif pengaturan tanah sempadan pantai dalam hukum positif Indonesia dan hukum Islam guna merumuskan model tata kelola yang berkeadilan dan berkelanjutan. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif terhadap literatur hukum nasional dan fikih kepemilikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum positif belum mampu memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum secara optimal, sedangkan hukum Islam menawarkan kerangka normatif berbasis keadilan kolektif dan perlindungan lingkungan. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi hukum positif dan prinsip-prinsip syariah dalam konteks pengelolaan kawasan pesisir. Kontribusi riset ini diharapkan dapat memperkaya wacana hukum agraria pesisir serta menjadi rujukan bagi pembuat kebijakan dalam menyusun regulasi yang inklusif dan partisipatif.

Penyelesaian Sengketa Gugatan Pembatalan Akad Pembiayaan Mudharabah Menurut Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam Pumieda, Reyna Amalia; Astarudin, Tatang; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 18 No 02 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 18 No 02 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v18i02.1334

This research examines the dispute resolution mechanism for mudharabah contract cancellation by integrating civil law and Islamic law perspectives in Indonesia. Mudharabah contract as a sharia financial instrument requires a clear dispute resolution mechanism when cancellation occurs due to breach of contract or violation of sharia principles. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with case analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 272 K/Ag/2015 between PT. Permodalan BV and Koperasi BS. The dispute resolution mechanism is regulated in Article 55 of Law No. 21 of 2008 with a hierarchy: deliberation, banking mediation, BASYARNAS, and religious courts. In civil law, contract cancellation is based on breach of contract (Articles 1243, 1266, 1267 of the Civil Code), while in Islamic law it occurs when the mudharib deviates from the principle of trust (KHES Articles 244, 251). The research results show legal uncertainty regarding the authority of courts versus sharia arbitration. The Supreme Court affirms the absolute competence of Religious Courts in sharia economics. Regulatory improvement and development of an effective sharia economic mediation system are needed to provide legal certainty.

Problematika Eksekusi Jaminan Gadai terhadap Objek yang Tidak Berada dalam Penguasaan Kreditur menurut Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan MA Nomor: 600/PK/pdt/2021): Problematika Eksekusi Jaminan Gadai terhadap Objek yang Tidak Berada dalam Penguasaan Kreditur menurut Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan MA Nomor: 600/PK/pdt/2021) Fitria Rahmat, Agnis; Astarudin, Tatang; Kamaludin Yusup, Deni
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 18 No 02 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 18 No 02 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v18i02.1335

Under civil law, the execution of a pledge requires physical possession of the pledged object by the creditor. However, in practice, it is not uncommon for the pledged object to be outside the creditor's control when the debtor defaults. This raises legal issues regarding execution and creditor protection. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of executing a pledge guarantee when the object is not in the creditor's possession, from the perspective of civil law and Islamic law. The method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach, based on literature review and analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number: 600/PK/Pdt/2021. The study finds that the absence of possession weakens the executorial power of the pledge, diminishes the creditor’s legal standing, and opens up the potential for disputes with third parties. In Islamic law, possession is also required for a valid rahn contract. Thus, possession is a key element in determining the legitimacy of pledge execution and ensuring legal certainty and protection for creditors.

Exploration of Islamic Economic Principles on Collateral in Legislation in Indonesia: Penelusuran Prinsip-Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah Tentang Jaminan dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia Sumiati, Sumiati; Janwari, Yadi; Yusup, Deni Kamaludin; Astarudin, Tatang
Asy-Syari'ah Vol. 26 No. 2 (2024): Asy-Syari'ah
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/as.v26i2.37523

Abstract: This research aims to examine and analyse the regulatory concept and legal position of guarantees in statutory regulations, and also seeks to explore the Harmonization of Sharia Economic Principles regarding Guarantees in statutory provisions. Analytical descriptive methods were used in this research, and a juridical-normative approach was used with qualitative research data types. Primary, secondary and tertiary data sources were obtained from several relevant literature. This research indicates that the concept of regulation and the legal position of guarantees in statutory provisions is contained in legislation that is made and ratified in writing. Conceptually, the legal regulation of guarantees can be divided into three, namely, the first concept of legal regulation of guarantees, which originates in Book II of the Civil Code, the second is the law of guarantees, which is regulated outside Book II of the Civil Code, the third is the legal regulation of guarantees according to law. sharia economics. Guarantee law acts as a subsidiary or complementary agreement. In connection with the harmonisation of Sharia economic principles, guarantees in statutory regulations can be understood through various principles of Sharia economic law reflected in legislation. These principles consist of the principle of worship (al-tauhid), the principle of justice (al-adl), the principle of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar, the principle of freedom (al-hurriyah), the principle of equality (al-musawah), the principle of helping each other (al -ta'awun), and the principle of tolerance (al-tasamuh), which is substantially contained in the legislation. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis pengaturan dan kedudukan hukum jaminan pada peraturan perundang-undangan, dan juga untuk menggali Prinsip-prinsip Ekonomi Syariah tentang Jaminan dalam ketentuan undang-undang. Metode deskriptif analitis digunakan pada penelitian ini, dan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif, dengan jenis data penelitian kualitatif. Sumber data primer, sekunder, dan tersier didapatkan dari beberapa literatur yang relevan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Konsep pengaturan hukum jaminan pada peraturan perundang-undangan dibedakan menjadi tiga yakni pertama konsep pengaturan hukum jaminan yang bersumber di dalam Buku II Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPdt), kedua pengaturan hukum jaminan yang terdapat di luar Buku II Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata ketiga pengaturan hukum jaminan menurut hukum ekonomi syariah. Hukum Jaminan berkedudukan sebagai perjanjian ikutan/pelengkap (Assecoir). Adapun alasan dibolehkannya objek yang dijaminkan pada akad pembiayaan di perbankan syariah didasarkan adanya kesadaran akan resiko terhadap munculnya moral hazard. Adapun Prinsip-prinsip ekonomi syariah tentang jaminan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dapat difahami melalui berbagai prinsip hukum ekonomi syariah pada berbagai perundang-undangan jaminan yang terdiri atas prinsip ibadah (al-tauhid), prinsip amar maâ€™ruf nahi munkar, prinsip keadilan (al-adl), prinsip kebebasan (al-hurriyah), prinsip persamaan/al musawah, prinsip saling tolong menolong (al-taâ€™awun), dan prinsip toleransi (al-tasamuh), yang secara substansial sudah terdapat di dalam perundang-undang tersebut, hanya saja keberadaan prinsip tersebut belum sepenuhnya terimplementasikan dalam peraturan jaminan.

Title

Found 27 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 27 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 27 Documents
Search