Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.052
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Jurnal Usia Dini Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Diponegoro Law Review PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Technomedia Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Al-Dustur DIFFRACTION: Journal for Physics Education and Applied Physics Petitum JURNAL MANAJEMEN MODAL INSANI DAN BISNIS (JMMIB) Information Technology Education Journal Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pedagogic Research - Applied Literacy Journal SASI Neraca: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS
Rizki Ramadani
Mahasiswa Program Studi Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS

 1 
Legal Analysis Of Telephone Conversation Recordings As Evidence In Civil Disputes Pratama, Yoga; Arsy, Muhammad; Ramadani, Rizki
ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): ADVANCES PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS (APRIL)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/6k76ny02

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the validity of telephone conversation recordings as evidence in civil disputes. This research was conducted using the Normative research method, also called doctrinal legal research, which is often conceptualized as what is written in laws and regulations or law is conceptualized as a rule or norm that is a benchmark for human behavior that is considered appropriate. The results of this study are that telephone conversation recordings can be strong evidence in civil disputes as long as they are obtained legally, do not violate privacy rights, and are accountable for their authenticity. The legal force of electronic evidence in civil cases basically depends on how the evidence can be verified and proven authentic in court. If the validity of electronic evidence can be proven, for example through expert witnesses or digital devices that can confirm its validity, then it can be considered with almost the same strength as written evidence in this case. However, in practice, electronic evidence often has a weaker position compared to letters in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code, especially because electronic evidence can be more susceptible to forgery or manipulation.
Artificial Intelligence Is Not an Author: The Limits of Human Creative Contribution in Copyright Protection rasyid, cindyramadani; Abbas, Ilham; Ramadani, Rizki
ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): ADVANCES PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS (APRIL)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/zpqxsw59

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis status hukum karya yang dihasilkan dengan bantuan kecerdasan buatan dalam sistem hak kekayaan intelektual Indonesia serta merumuskan mekanisme perlindungan hukumnya. Ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan hak cipta dianalisis melalui penafsiran sistematis, ekstensif, dan teleologis guna menjawab permasalahan terkait originalitas dan subjek pencipta.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, dan sejarah. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan metode interpretasi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa status hukum karya berbasis kecerdasan buatan ditentukan oleh adanya kontribusi kreatif manusia. Berdasarkan penafsiran Pasal 1 angka 2 jo. Pasal 1 angka 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, karya yang dihasilkan dengan bantuan kecerdasan buatan dapat dilindungi hak cipta sepanjang terdapat kontribusi kreatif manusia yang substansial, sedangkan karya yang dihasilkan sepenuhnya oleh kecerdasan buatan tanpa keterlibatan kreatif manusia tidak memenuhi kualifikasi sebagai ciptaan. Perlindungan hukum tersedia melalui mekanisme preventif dan represif, namun masih terdapat kekosongan hukum terkait kriteria operasional kontribusi kreatif manusia. Sebagai rekomendasi, pemerintah perlu menetapkan pedoman teknis melalui peraturan pelaksana untuk memperjelas kriteria kontribusi kreatif manusia dalam pencatatan dan perlindungan ciptaan berbasis kecerdasan buatan guna menjamin kepastian hukum. Abstract: This study aims to analyze the legal status of works generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence within Indonesia's intellectual property rights system and to formulate appropriate legal protection mechanisms. The provisions of copyright legislation are examined through systematic, extensive, and teleological interpretation in order to address issues concerning originality and the subject of authorship. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, case, and historical approaches. Data were obtained through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which were analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation methods. The findings indicate that the legal status of artificial intelligence-based works is determined by the presence of human creative contribution. Based on the interpretation of Article 1 Point 2 in conjunction with Article 1 Point 3 of Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, works generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence may be protected under copyright law insofar as substantial human creative contribution is present, whereas works produced entirely by artificial intelligence without any human creative involvement do not qualify as copyrightable works. Legal protection is available through both preventive and repressive mechanisms; however, a legal vacuum persists with respect to the operational criteria for determining human creative contribution. As a recommendation, the government should establish technical guidelines through implementing regulations to clarify the criteria for human creative contribution in the registration and protection of artificial intelligence-based works, thereby ensuring legal certainty.
Co-Authors Abbas, Ilham Amin, Fadlullah Amiruddin Amiruddin Andi Azhar Apri Nuryanto Arifin, Muhammad Ya'rif Arsy, Muhammad Artha Mahindra Diputera Asriati Asriati, Asriati Bahrun, Khairul Bali, Muhammad Mushfi El Iq Bima, Muhammad Rinaldi Busthami, Dachran Deasy, Deasy Yuni Pratiwi Eka Saputra. B, Imran Hamzah, Yuli Adha Indri Handayani, Indri Mamonto, Moch Andry Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, Moch. Andri Wikra Wardhana Mangerengi, Arianty Anggraeni Muhammad Ilyas Muhammad Nur Pratama, Arizqi Ihsan Rahman, Ali rasyid, cindyramadani Razak, Askari Roni Sinaga Sabrina, Purwanti Lelly Setiadi, Ade Suryani, St. Wahida Wahida Wardhana Mamonto, Moch Andry Wikra Yahya Darmawan Yoga Pratama