Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : EnviroScienteae

POTENSI DAN KAJIAN TIMBULAN SAMPAH PEMUKIMAN DI KAWASAN KOTA BANJARBARU (STUDI KASUS KELURAHAN GUNTUNG MANGGIS) Luh Putu Lilis Suliatini; Danang Biyatmoko; Udiantoro Udiantoro; Khairunnisa Khairunnisa
EnviroScienteae Vol 9, No 2 (2013): EnviroScienteae Volume 9 Nomor 2, Agustus 2013
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/es.v9i2.1988

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the potential of household waste generation in urban settlements smooth mangosteen, measure the density of household waste in urban settlements mangosteen smooth, determine the composition of household waste in urban settlements smooth mangosteen, analyzing the value of Recovery Factor (RF) of household waste settlements that can be recycled. The method used in this study is a survey method using questionnaires and community respondents in Manggis Village Guntung Banjarbaru City. Measurement of the amount of waste generation starts with determining the sampling site, the blunt Manggis Village. Retrieval based on the number of samples SNI 19-3964-1995 (National Standardization Agency, 1995) on the Sampling Method and Sample Measurement Generation and Waste Composition by simple random sampling, the sampling method of random members of the population, regardless of the strata in the population members (Riduwan, 2007), in this study the sampling time was 8 days in a row. Can result in waste generation residential households in the Village of mangosteen Guntung 157.77632 kg / capita. Waste density residential households in the Village Guntung get the mangosteen in the average yield of 92.2019 kg/m3 density. Composition of household waste in the Village Guntung mangosteen settlement can result in organic waste 71.4516%, followed by 11.3125% of plastic waste paper waste at 0.84587%, 0.80855% of glass waste, waste iron at 0, 55 977% and other waste of 7.46361%. Value Recovery Factor (RF) potential recycling 91.39% wet waste, plastic waste, waste iron, and 100.0% waste glass, waste paper and other garbage 0.000%.
Co-Authors - Asysyifa Abdi Fithria Abdi Fithria Abdi Fithria Abrani Abrani Adi Rahmadi Afiena Puspadini Afryanda Eka Bagaskara Agil Ramanda Raytodi Ahmad Faizin, Ahmad Algifari Musthofan Andi Harahap Ayu Manipa Ayu Novita Sari Badaruddin Badaruddin Badaruddin Badaruddin Beny Ristanto Danang Biyatmoko Dewi Permatasari Dewi, Emelda Fitrian Diana Ulfah Dwi Tratna Wibawa Eko Rini Indrayatie Eny Dwi Pujawati Eva Prihatiningtyas Fatkhunnisa Irkhamni Fazlul Wahyudi Firmansyah Firmansyah Fitria Naimatin Khasanah Fonny Rianawati Gusti Abdul Rahmat Thamrin Hamdani Fauzi Herman Herman Hidayatullah, Muhammad Indah Komala Sari Januar Arthani Jupri Mustofa Khairuddin Khairuddin Limbong, Melani Luh Putu Lilis Suliatini Lusyiani Lusyiani Maepadeapati Chitta Marni Marni Mirna Mirna Misin, Misin Mochamad Arief Soendjoto Mochamad Arief Soendjoto Monica Andriana Muhammad Arif Rahman Muhammad Dienul Hafiz Muhammad Faisal Mahdie Muhammad Faisal Mahdie Muhammad Fikri Fani Ansori Muhammad Helmi Muhammad Rizki Naparin, Muhammad Nida Hasanah Noor Mirad Sari Noorlinda Novianty Novyta Eka Setyarini Puspita, Dian Endah Rani, Syahrul Regina Putri Utami Rina Muhayah Noor Pitri Rina Muhayah Noor Pitri, Rina Muhayah Noor ROHMAH, FAIZATUR Roy Sandi Hasugian Shinta Ajar Shinta Uli Lumbantoruan Stephany Turnip Syamani D. Ali Syamsudin Syamsudin Syarifuddin Kadir Tri Sanjaya Udiantoro Udiantoro Violet Violet Burhanuddin Violet Violet Violet Violet Violet Violet Violet, Violet Widya Nurhasanah Yuda Pranata Yudha Pahing Perdana Yulicia , Zamrudhinda Minna Yuniarti Yuniarti Zainal Islami