Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ANAK YANG BELUM BERUMUR 12 (DUA BELAS) TAHUN PADA TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN DI POLRESTA PADANG Suryadinata LBN Gaol; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.806

Investigators, social counselors and professional social workers must work together and coordinate with each other so that the stages as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Who Are Not Yet 12 Years Old, the initial initiative for implementing this government regulation in The investigator's hand is supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or put in LPKS. The type of research used in this study is an empirical juridical approach and is descriptive analysis in nature. The roles of Investigators, Community Counselors and Professional Social Workers have their respective roles in coordinating the decision making of perpetrators of children under the age of 12 as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Underage Children 12 years old. the initial initiative for implementing these government regulations lies in the hands of investigators supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or admitted to LPKS.

Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak Yang Belum Berumur 12 (Dua Belas) Tahun pada Tingkat Penyidikan di Polresta Padang Suryadinata LBN Gaol; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.898

Investigators, social counselors and professional social workers must work together and coordinate with each other so that the stages as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Who Are Not Yet 12 Years Old, the initial initiative for implementing this government regulation in The investigator's hand is supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or put in LPKS. The type of research used in this study is an empirical juridical approach and is descriptive analysis in nature. The roles of Investigators, Community Counselors and Professional Social Workers have their respective roles in coordinating the decision making of perpetrators of children under the age of 12 as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Underage Children 12 years old. the initial initiative for implementing these government regulations lies in the hands of investigators supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or admitted to LPKS.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Oleh Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan, Perlindungan Anak, Pengendalian Penduduk, dan Keluarga Berencana (Dp3ap2kb) Kota Padang Trisanti Trisanti; Aria Zurnetti; Khairani Khairani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.916

Children are very vulnerable to becoming victims of crime, many children are targets of acts of violence. In Padang city violence against children in 2021 there was 63 cases of violence recorded. Based on Article 59 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, local governments are obliged to provide protection for child victims. This research focuses on two issues, First: How is the legal protection of child victims of violent crimes committed by DP3AP2KB Padang City, Second: How is the implementation of legal protection for child victims of violent crimes committed by DP3AP2KB Padang City.This study uses empirical juridical research methods with analytical descriptive characteristics. Sources were obtained from interviews, reports and documents. Secondary data comes from related laws and regulations, articles, journals, and internet sites. The results of the research, First, the legal protection carried out by DP3AP2KB is to provide consulting services and legal process assistance to ensure the fulfillment of children's rights so that they can recover and be able to carry out social functions in their environment, social field. Second, the implementation of legal protection for child victims of violent crimes by DP3AP2KB experienced several obstacles, namely a lack of human resources, a lack of special experts such as child clinical psychologists and a lack of budget, facilities and infrastructure. so it must coordinate with other agencies.

Pertimbangan Penuntut Umum Memilih Tempat Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Dalam Mendakwa Pelaku Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana di Luar Daerah Hukumnya Pada Surat Dakwaan Register Perkara: Pdm-15/Ppjng/Eoh.2/03/2021 Yunita Eka Putri; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.940

Public Prosecutor is a prosecutor at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia who is authorized by law to conduct prosecutions, which process includes the authority to compose indictments. In exercising this authority, Article 15 and Article 137 of the Criminal Procedural Code (KUHAP) provide limitations for Public Prosecutors to conduct prosecutions within their jurisdictions, however, in practice it is found that Public Prosecutors indict criminal offenders who committed crimes outside their given jurisdiction (extra-jurisdictional). To study this phenomenon and its legal consequences, this research examines the consideration of the Public Prosecutor at Padang Panjang District Prosecutor's Office who indicted the perpetrator of criminal offense outside its given jurisdiction, as found in indictment No. PDM-15/PPJNG/Eoh.2/03/2021 on behalf of the defendant Aziarlis Bin Ameh Pgl Ziar, by employing empirical legal research methods based on primary data obtained by interviewing related Judges, lawyer and Public Prosecutors and also based on secondary data obtained through literature studies of various regulations and references that are analyzed qualitatively. This study finds that despite the restrictions imposed by KUHAP, extra-jurisdictional indictment is made possible through several provision in legislation, including Article 2 paragraph (3) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 concerning the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia. This study also recommends that the Supreme Court should consistently apply Article 4 paragraph (1) of Law No. 49 year 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 2 Year 1986 concerning General Courts, which is included as a consideration in Chief Justice Decree No. 200/KMA/SK/X/2018.

Penyidikan Tindak Pidana di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan oleh Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Provinsi Sumatera Barat Zaifi Surya Gemilang; Aria Zurnetti; Khairani Khairani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1006

Criminal activities in the labor industry are illegal acts carried out by laborers, employers, or other persons not affiliated with the firm that face criminal penalties under the Criminal Code, Manpower Law, and/or other legislation, either alone or in combination. In the course of Civil Servant Investigators' criminal inquiries in the labor sector. The Manpower and Transmigration Service (Disnakertrans) employs Civil Servant Investigators who carry out their work in accordance with the Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and the Regulation of the Chief of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2010 concerning Investigation Management by Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS). Both laws provide authority for their operations. It seems sense in this instance that PPNS Disnakertrans's inquiry is coordinated with the police as well. One of the issues preventing the inquiry from operating at its best in its execution is the ineffective coordination. The following issues may be created based on the backdrop of the aforementioned difficulties: 1. How are criminal investigations in the area of labor being carried out by Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) of the Manpower and Transmigration Office of West Sumatra Province? 2. What are the challenges facing the Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) of the Manpower and Transmigration Office of the Province of West Sumatra in carrying out criminal investigations in the area of labor? Based on the study's descriptive methodology and empirical juridical approach, the following conclusions may be drawn from it: 1. The implementation of criminal investigations in the field of labor by PPNS Disnakertrans is a series of: examination, processing of crime scenes, Sprindik, SPDP, examination of witnesses and suspects, completion and submission of Case Files to be submitted by PPNS to the public prosecutor through police investigators. 2. The obstacles experienced by PPNS Disnakertrans in carrying out criminal investigations in the field of labor are the lack of supervisors and PPNS both in quantity and quality. In addition, the lack of facilities and infrastructure as well as limited budget are obstacles in the investigation. SOPs that are not fully implemented and lack of coordination between PPNS and the Police as Korwas are obstacles found in the implementation of criminal investigations in the field of labor. For better implementation of investigations, PPNS Disnakertrans West Sumatra must be able to improve coordination with Police Investigators. In addition, Disnakertrans is expected to be able to overcome internal obstacles so that the enforcement of criminal acts in the labor sector can run even better.

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Banyak Orang Pada Kasus Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg Vananda Putra; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1100

The rise of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, and the very dangerous impacts they cause, can even destroy the socio-cultural, political, moral and legal pillars of national security, so in reality overcoming these disgraceful acts must be done in extraordinary ways, So it is appropriate to say that criminal acts of corruption are included in extraordinary crimes. No. Corruption is often committed jointly, criminal law already regulates criminal acts of joint conduct or what is called participation (deelneming). However, often in proving criminal acts of corruption, the prosecutor does not develop the existence of other perpetrators who can be held accountable. The problems in this research are 1) What is the form of error and criminal responsibility of each perpetrator in criminal acts of corruption committed by many people (Case Study Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg 2) How is the Evidence in the Case Corruption committed by many people in Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg. 3) What are the considerations of the Panel of Judges in Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg? This type of research is normative juridical research, using a statutory and conceptual approach, with primary and secondary data collection techniques. Based on the results of research and discussion, the concept of criminal acts committed jointly in corruption crimes is if the criminal act of corruption is committed by more than one person or two more people who together have the intention or desire for the act to be carried out. The conclusion of this research is that the decision of the Padang High Court is correct, because it strengthens the decision of the Corruption Crime Court at the Padang District Court Number 46/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN.Pdg, but the responsibility of other perpetrators who participated in the crime corruption in this case, still not held accountable.

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana di Bawah Ancaman Minimum Khusus Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak. (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Payakumbuh Nomor 120/Pid.Sus/2022) Khofifah Kusuma Wardani; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1338

The norms of judge's consideration are regulated juridically in Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that a judge, when imposing a crime on a defendant, may not impose the crime unless there are at least two valid pieces of evidence, so that the judge has confidence that a crime actually occurred and the defendant is guilty of doing it. The case that often occurs is child molestation as regulated in Article 81 of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. The purpose of legal regulations regarding child molestation is to protect child victims from perpetrators of these crimes. In its application, discrepancies were found between written legal rules and those applied by judges. Another case of child molestation that occurred and that the author examined was in Payakumbuh, case number 120/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. This is quite unfortunate with the existence of SEMA Number 1 of 2017, because ultimately it is not SEMA that clarifies or provides guidance to Judges, but rather disrupts the legal order and tries to create new norms in the midst of existing norms. The conclusions (1) The judge's considerations from the "justice side" which are guided by SEMA Number 1 of 2017 according to the author have not paid attention to considerations of philosophical, juridical, sociological, educative, preventive, corrective and repressive aspects of imposing a crime below the special minimum for the crime of child molestation. . (2) It is realized that evidence in the form of the defendant's own confession does not always prove the truth. Confession sometimes does not guarantee that the defendant actually committed the act charged. Therefore, the Judge's own confidence is needed. The suggestions that the author makes are (1) Judges in making legal considerations are expected to be able to make them more comprehensively, especially in the case of SEMA Number 1 of 2017. (2) it is recommended that every member of the community take an active role in preventing and dealing with the problem of sexual abuse, such as Immediately report to the authorities if you see and find out.

Law Enforcement Model of Village Fund Corruption Through Adat Criminal Law Approach and Local Wisdom in West Sumatera Aria Zurnetti; Nani Mulyati
Nagari Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.116-127.2022

Corruption in Indonesia has its own characteristics. Corruption crimes committed at the village level have caused losses to state finances. Countermeasures against corruption in village funds are required to be effective and firm, in order to be able to resolve and to reduce the number of corruption in the future. This paper discusses the pattern of corruption in West Sumatra, especially in the cities of Solok and Pariaman, and discusses the prevention model used against corruption. The methodology used to answer these problems is normative juridical research. The results of the study found that the pattern of corruption tended to vary in each region, such as double budget, mark-up, unilateral withdrawal of nagari funds by nagari administrators. However, there is a pattern that is always found in every case, namely not making a deposit of tax collection results, the tax money is intentionally not deposited and used for personal interests which causes state financial losses. Furthermore, countermeasures are taken repressively using Indonesian criminal law, as well as preventively by establishing a nagari regulation that uses a customary criminal law approach. West Sumatra has its local wisdom that is still alive and well maintained, even the community respects customary criminal law more than positive law, therefore preventive efforts by using the customary criminal law approach are expected to be able to create nagari that are free from corruption. In an effort to prevent corruption of village funds and Village Fund Allocation (ADD) by village officials, the government of Nagari Situjuah Batua, Situjuah Limo Nagari District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency, West Sumatra, made legal rules based on customary law. The regulation is stated in the Situjuah Batua Nagari Regulation Number 8 of 2019 concerning Prevention of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism Based on the Salingka Nagari Customary Law

Penerapan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Ridwan Syafaat Yori; Aria Zurnetti; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1782

Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Selanjutnya ditulis Perja No.15 Tahun 2020) memberikan kewenangan kepada Jaksa untuk menghentikan penuntutan terhadap perkara tindak pidana berdasarkan restorative justice dengan tujuan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula bukan berorientasi pada pembalasan. Penerapan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice yang dilakukan Jaksa Penuntut Umum di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan dalam perkara tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan yang diatur Pasal 363 ayat (1) ke 5 KUHP diancaman dengan pidana penjara paling lama 7 tahun tidak sesuai dengan syarat batas ancaman pidana maksimal penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf B Perja No.15 Tahun 2020 yang menyatakan bahwa ancaman penjara tidak lebih dari 5 tahun.

Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Sebagai Saksi Tindak Pidana Pencabulan di Wilayah Hukum Kejaksaan Negeri Agam Reza Tri Putra Aldrin; Aria Zurnetti; Nilma Suryani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2101

Children need special protection to maintain their dignity and dignity, in accordance with the objectives of the Criminal Justice System in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The Prosecutor's Office and other child protection institutions as part of the criminal justice sub-system, play a role in helping and protecting child victims as witnesses in trials. According to Article 1 Number 8 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, namely Protection is all efforts to fulfill rights and provide assistance to provide a sense of security to Witnesses and/or Victims which must be carried out by the Witness and Victim Protection Institute (LPSK) or other institutions in accordance with the provisions of this Law. The problem is that in one of the cases in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Prosecutor's Office, on the agenda of the witness examination (evidence) at the Lubuk Basung District Court, the victim's child's statement as a witness is different from the information in the Examination Report (BAP) in the case file made by the West Sumatra Police Investigator. This caused the defendant to be acquitted by the Lubuk Basung District Court Judge who was previously prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor for 15 (fifteen) years. Therefore, the defendant was proven innocent because the victim's child's testimony as a witness could not convince the judge that the defendant had committed a criminal act of obscenity. In this case, it can be seen whether the victim's child received intervention from another party when he became a witness so that his statement at trial was different from the information in the Examination Report (BAP) in the case file. The formulation of the problems discussed in this study is 1. How is the implementation of legal protection for child victims as witnesses to criminal acts of abuse in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Attorney's Office 2. What are the obstacles faced by the Prosecutor in implementing legal protection for child victims as witnesses to criminal acts of abuse in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Attorney's Office? The research method used is empirical legal research (empirical juridical) which is supported by research in the Jurisdiction of the Agam District Attorney's Office. The results of the study show that the implementation of legal protection for child victims as witnesses to criminal acts of abuse in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Prosecutor's Office has been accompanied by professional social workers, but the legal protection for the victim's child has not been maximized because there is still intervention from certain parties so as to affect the victim's child's testimony in the trial. The obstacle faced by the prosecutor is that the victim's child is limited in providing Testimony, the public prosecutor found it difficult to prove the charges at trial, the defendant did not admit to his actions. This makes it difficult for the Public Prosecutor to prove at trial and carry out legal protection for the victim's child as a witness.

Title

Found 56 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 56 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 56 Documents
Search