Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.814
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Hukum Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Buletin Ilmiah Nagari Membangun Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Syntax Transformation UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities (AIJOSH) El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi Lareh Law Review Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology
Aria Zurnetti, Aria
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 57 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 57 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Banyak Orang Pada Kasus Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg Putra, Vananda; Danil, Elwi; Zurnetti, Aria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1100

Abstract

The rise of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, and the very dangerous impacts they cause, can even destroy the socio-cultural, political, moral and legal pillars of national security, so in reality overcoming these disgraceful acts must be done in extraordinary ways, So it is appropriate to say that criminal acts of corruption are included in extraordinary crimes. No. Corruption is often committed jointly, criminal law already regulates criminal acts of joint conduct or what is called participation (deelneming). However, often in proving criminal acts of corruption, the prosecutor does not develop the existence of other perpetrators who can be held accountable. The problems in this research are 1) What is the form of error and criminal responsibility of each perpetrator in criminal acts of corruption committed by many people (Case Study Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg 2) How is the Evidence in the Case Corruption committed by many people in Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg. 3) What are the considerations of the Panel of Judges in Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg? This type of research is normative juridical research, using a statutory and conceptual approach, with primary and secondary data collection techniques. Based on the results of research and discussion, the concept of criminal acts committed jointly in corruption crimes is if the criminal act of corruption is committed by more than one person or two more people who together have the intention or desire for the act to be carried out. The conclusion of this research is that the decision of the Padang High Court is correct, because it strengthens the decision of the Corruption Crime Court at the Padang District Court Number 46/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN.Pdg, but the responsibility of other perpetrators who participated in the crime corruption in this case, still not held accountable.
Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana di Bawah Ancaman Minimum Khusus Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak. (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Payakumbuh Nomor 120/Pid.Sus/2022) Kusuma Wardani, Khofifah; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Zurnetti, Aria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1338

Abstract

The norms of judge's consideration are regulated juridically in Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that a judge, when imposing a crime on a defendant, may not impose the crime unless there are at least two valid pieces of evidence, so that the judge has confidence that a crime actually occurred and the defendant is guilty of doing it. The case that often occurs is child molestation as regulated in Article 81 of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. The purpose of legal regulations regarding child molestation is to protect child victims from perpetrators of these crimes. In its application, discrepancies were found between written legal rules and those applied by judges. Another case of child molestation that occurred and that the author examined was in Payakumbuh, case number 120/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. This is quite unfortunate with the existence of SEMA Number 1 of 2017, because ultimately it is not SEMA that clarifies or provides guidance to Judges, but rather disrupts the legal order and tries to create new norms in the midst of existing norms. The conclusions (1) The judge's considerations from the "justice side" which are guided by SEMA Number 1 of 2017 according to the author have not paid attention to considerations of philosophical, juridical, sociological, educative, preventive, corrective and repressive aspects of imposing a crime below the special minimum for the crime of child molestation. . (2) It is realized that evidence in the form of the defendant's own confession does not always prove the truth. Confession sometimes does not guarantee that the defendant actually committed the act charged. Therefore, the Judge's own confidence is needed. The suggestions that the author makes are (1) Judges in making legal considerations are expected to be able to make them more comprehensively, especially in the case of SEMA Number 1 of 2017. (2) it is recommended that every member of the community take an active role in preventing and dealing with the problem of sexual abuse, such as Immediately report to the authorities if you see and find out.
Penerapan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Ridwan Syafaat Yori; Aria Zurnetti; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1782

Abstract

Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Selanjutnya ditulis Perja No.15 Tahun 2020) memberikan kewenangan kepada Jaksa untuk menghentikan penuntutan terhadap perkara tindak pidana berdasarkan restorative justice dengan tujuan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula bukan berorientasi pada pembalasan. Penerapan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice yang dilakukan Jaksa Penuntut Umum di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan dalam perkara tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan yang diatur Pasal 363 ayat (1) ke 5 KUHP diancaman dengan pidana penjara paling lama 7 tahun tidak sesuai dengan syarat batas ancaman pidana maksimal penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf B Perja No.15 Tahun 2020 yang menyatakan bahwa ancaman penjara tidak lebih dari 5 tahun.
Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Sebagai Saksi Tindak Pidana Pencabulan di Wilayah Hukum Kejaksaan Negeri Agam Reza Tri Putra Aldrin; Aria Zurnetti; Nilma Suryani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2101

Abstract

Children need special protection to maintain their dignity and dignity, in accordance with the objectives of the Criminal Justice System in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The Prosecutor's Office and other child protection institutions as part of the criminal justice sub-system, play a role in helping and protecting child victims as witnesses in trials. According to Article 1 Number 8 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, namely Protection is all efforts to fulfill rights and provide assistance to provide a sense of security to Witnesses and/or Victims which must be carried out by the Witness and Victim Protection Institute (LPSK) or other institutions in accordance with the provisions of this Law. The problem is that in one of the cases in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Prosecutor's Office, on the agenda of the witness examination (evidence) at the Lubuk Basung District Court, the victim's child's statement as a witness is different from the information in the Examination Report (BAP) in the case file made by the West Sumatra Police Investigator. This caused the defendant to be acquitted by the Lubuk Basung District Court Judge who was previously prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor for 15 (fifteen) years. Therefore, the defendant was proven innocent because the victim's child's testimony as a witness could not convince the judge that the defendant had committed a criminal act of obscenity. In this case, it can be seen whether the victim's child received intervention from another party when he became a witness so that his statement at trial was different from the information in the Examination Report (BAP) in the case file. The formulation of the problems discussed in this study is 1. How is the implementation of legal protection for child victims as witnesses to criminal acts of abuse in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Attorney's Office 2. What are the obstacles faced by the Prosecutor in implementing legal protection for child victims as witnesses to criminal acts of abuse in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Attorney's Office? The research method used is empirical legal research (empirical juridical) which is supported by research in the Jurisdiction of the Agam District Attorney's Office. The results of the study show that the implementation of legal protection for child victims as witnesses to criminal acts of abuse in the jurisdiction of the Agam District Prosecutor's Office has been accompanied by professional social workers, but the legal protection for the victim's child has not been maximized because there is still intervention from certain parties so as to affect the victim's child's testimony in the trial. The obstacle faced by the prosecutor is that the victim's child is limited in providing Testimony, the public prosecutor found it difficult to prove the charges at trial, the defendant did not admit to his actions. This makes it difficult for the Public Prosecutor to prove at trial and carry out legal protection for the victim's child as a witness.
Urgensi Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum dalam Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam Pengulangan Tindak Pidana: (Studi kasus terhadap Perkara Nomor 3/Pid.Sus Anak/2022.PN.Pnn dan Nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022.PN.Pnn) Apred Zenegger, Tigor; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Zurnetti, Aria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2185

Abstract

Persoalan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah penerapan diversi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan setelah terjadi pengulangan kejahatan dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia dan pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh hakim untuk menerapkan diversi kepada anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum ketika terjadi pengulangan kejahatan terhadap pelaku yang sama. Adapun penelitian yang digunakan dengan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif bersifat deskriptif analitis, Dalam menerapkan diversi Anak yang melakukan tindak pidana dan telah dijatuhi pidana oleh hakim dengan putusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap, selanjutnya melakukan tindak pidana lagi, berdasarkan Penjelasan Pasal 7 ayat (2) Undang-undang SPPA maka tidak dapat diupayakan diversi. Demikian pula dengan tindak pidana sebelumnya yang telah dilakukan diversi, maka tidak dapat diupayakan diversi lagi apabila anak melakukan tindak pidana lagi, Namun dalam penerapannya terjadi diversi terhadap pengulangan pidana sebagaimana dalam penetapan Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Painan dalam perkara nomor 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Pnn dan nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Pnn, terhadap perkara pertama terkait perlindungan anak dan yang kedua terkait penganiayaan anak, meski demikian kedua perkara terselesaikan dengan diversi. Oleh karena itu agar semua komponen bangsa terutama penegak hukum yang menangani kasus-kasus anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum betul-betul menghayati, menyadari dan menerapkan ide Diversi ini demi kelangsungan hidup yang baik bagi anak selaku generasi penerus bangsa yang tidak mesti dan tidak perlu diterapkan prosedural hukum seperti orang dewasa.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Lembaga Pengumpul Zakat yang Tidak Memiliki Izin di Sumatera Barat Afdilla, Andra; Zurnetti, Aria; Yasniwati, Yasniwati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2218

Abstract

Abstract: The Government of the Republic of Indonesia through Law Number 23 Year 2011 on Zakat Management prohibits unauthorized institutions to collect zakat because it has the potential to misuse the collected zakat funds. The collection of zakat funds by unauthorized institutions in West Sumatra Province has the effect of losing public trust in making zakat payments and zakat funds that have been collected by unauthorized institutions have the potential to fund other criminal activities such as terrorism movements that threaten the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia. The formulation of this research problem are: (1) How is the criminal law enforcement against unauthorized zakat collecting institution based on Law Number 23 Year 2011 on Zakat Management by law enforcement officials in West Sumatera? 2) How are the efforts that have been made in law enforcement against criminal acts of zakat management by unauthorized zakat collecting institution in West Sumatera? This research was conducted with sociological juridical research methods and the data sources of this research were primary data and secondary data, data collection techniques were carried out by interview and analyzed qualitatively. The conclusions of this study are 1) Criminal law enforcement against unlicensed zakat collection institutions based on Law number 23 of 2011 concerning zakat management by law enforcement officials in West Sumatra is carried out by the West Sumatra Regional Police which is influenced by legal factors, law enforcers, facilities, society, and culture. 2) Efforts that have been made in criminal law enforcement against unlicensed zakat collection institutions based on Law number 23 of 2011 concerning zakat management in West Sumatra are penal efforts and non-penal efforts (Socialization). Keyword: Zakat, Law Enforcement, Crime, Illegal Institution
Legalitas Penyadapan Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jaksa Guna Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi  Dolansyah, Gugi; Zurnetti, Aria; Yoserwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/h3wr5n40

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi merupakan kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crime) yang merugikan keuangan negara dan merusak tatanan sosial-ekonomi masyarakat. Upaya pemberantasannya memerlukan metode yang luar biasa pula, salah satunya melalui penyadapan (intersepsi). Namun demikian, praktik penyadapan yang dilakukan oleh jaksa dalam proses penanganan tindak pidana korupsi masih menuai perdebatan, terutama terkait dengan aspek legalitasnya, mengingat Undang-Undang Kejaksaan tidak secara eksplisit memberikan kewenangan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis: (1) kedudukan penyadapan dalam pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi; dan (2) legalitas penyadapan oleh jaksa dalam penanganan perkara korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyadapan termasuk dalam alat bukti petunjuk berupa dokumen elektronik sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) dan dapat digunakan dalam pembuktian kasus korupsi. Namun, agar sah dan memenuhi prinsip due process of law, penyadapan oleh jaksa harus mendapat izin dari Ketua Pengadilan Negeri dan dilakukan sesuai dengan prosedur hukum yang berlaku. Dengan demikian, legalitas penyadapan oleh jaksa tetap dimungkinkan secara terbatas dan bersyarat. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan adanya penguatan regulasi yang secara tegas mengatur kewenangan penyadapan oleh kejaksaan guna mencegah penyalahgunaan dan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia dalam proses penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi.
Co-Authors Afdilla, Andra Apred Zenegger, Tigor Awilda Awilda Awilda, Awilda Chandra, Yonatan Iskandar desky, teku ananta Dolansyah, Gugi Efendi, Roni Efendi, Roni Efren Nova Elda, Edita Elwi Danil Fachrie, Yogie Fadhilah Sabri Fadhilah Sabri Febrian Akhirama Saputra Fengki Andreas Fengki Andreas Gaol, Suryadinata LBN Gemilang, Zaifi Surya Ghifari, Teguh Harfiani, Putri Salsa Henni Muchtar Herri Hendra Intania Iqbal, Tavialsyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Kamila Hesti Kevin Lie Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Khofifah Kusuma Wardani Khoirunnisa, Umni Kusuma Wardani, Khofifah LBN Gaol, Suryadinata Maulana Fajri Adrian Maulana Fajri Adrian Mukhti, Putri Cempaka Najmi Najmi Najmi Najmi, Najmi Nani Mulyati Nilma Suryani Nurjannatul Fadhilah Oktriadi Kurniawan Putra, Vananda Putri Cempaka Mukhti Raihany, Farras Audia Reza Tri Putra Aldrin Rias, Irzal Ridwan Syafaat Yori Riki Afrizal Saputra, Febrian Akhirama Sinaga, Risa Putri Siska Elvandari Suharizal Sukmareni Sukmareni Sukmareni Sukmareni, Sukmareni Suryadinata LBN Gaol Suryadinata LBN Gaol Teguh Sulistia Trisanti Trisanti Trisanti, Trisanti Vananda Putra Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yonatan Iskandar Chandra Yoserwan Yulia Susanti, Yulia Yunita Eka Putri Yunita Eka Putri Zaifi Surya Gemilang