Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTOR YANG GAGAL MELAKUKAN DUE DILIGENCE SEHINGGA TERJEBAK INVESTASI BODONG Suryani, Ummi; Sirait, Ningrum N.; Robert, Robert
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4718

Abstract

Abstract: Due diligence prior to investing, whether conducted independenly by investors or with the assistance of legal consultants, is a form of precautionary action to avoid fraudulent/illegal invesments. The Financial Services Authority’s efforts in preventing fraudulent/illegal invesment through socialization and education to the public are essential for ensuring legal protection for investors. The methodology employed in this thesis is a normative juridical research method, which refers to legal norms and is conducted through library research. This study is descriptive in nature, and the data analysis method used is qualitative. The research findings reveal that the legal aspect of due diligence by investors in invesment activities involves the participation of legal consultants, with the investor acting as the implementer of the due diligence process. This is done to assess and consider invesment opportunies, thus preventing involvement in fraudulent invesments. The Financial Services Authority’s actions in regulating and supervising investors to perform due diligence in order to prevent fraudulent invesments are in accordance with Law  Number 4 of 2023 on the Development and Strengthening of the Fnancial Sector, amending Law Number 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authory. Legal protection for investors who fail to conduct due diligence and fall victim to fraudulent invesments can be viewed from the perspective of personal responsibility and the responsibility of the legal consultants if their services were utilized. Keyword: Invesment, Due Diligence, Legal Protection Abstrak: Due diligence dapat dilakukan oleh investor secara mandiri dan menggunakan jasa konsultan hukum adalah sebagai bentuk tindakan investor agar terhindar dari investasi bodong/illegal. Tindakan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam pencegahan investasi bodong/illegal dengan cara sosialisasi dan edukasi kepada masyarakat, sehingga perlindungan hukum terhadap investor dapat dilaksanakan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normative, yaitu metode yang mengacu pada norma hukum yang dilakukan dengan studi Pustaka. Penelitian ini memiliki sifat deskriptif. Metode Analisa data yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa aspek hukum pelaksanaan due diligence oleh investor dalam kegiatan investasi adalah dengan melibatkan konsultan hukum dan investor sebagai pelaksana dari proses due diligence tersebut. Hal ini dilakukan untuk pemeriksaan dan pertimbangan investor agar terhindar dari investasi bodong. Tindakan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam menerapkan pegaturan dan pengawasan investor dalam melaksanakan due diligence untuk mencegah investasi bodong adalah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan atas Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuagan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap investor yang gagal melakukan due diligence sehingga terjebak investasi bodong dapat dilihat dari segi tanggungjawab mandiri dan tanggungjawab konsultan hukum apabila menggunakan jasa konsultan hukum. Kata kunci: Investasi, Due Diligence, Perlindungan Hukum  
Legal Challenges of PT Industri Nabati Lestari in Stabilizing National Cooking Oil Prices through the Minyakita Program: An Analysis of Price Increases Exceeding the Highest Retail Price Tarigan, Klaudius Epikuri Loga; Sukarja, Detania; Robert, Robert
Ultimate Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Law and Society
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/uljls.v2i2.23349

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of price increases in Minyakita, a government-sponsored affordable cooking oil program, which have exceeded the Highest Retail Price (HET) set under Ministry of Trade Regulation No. 18 of 2024. The Minyakita program, involving PT Industri Nabati Lestari (INL), was introduced to stabilize national cooking oil prices and ensure consumer protection. However, field observations indicate distribution violations, hoarding practices, and sales above the regulated HET. This research analyzes the legal aspects of the Domestic Market Obligation (DMO), the effectiveness of HET regulation from the perspective of consumer protection under Law No. 8 of 1999, and the legal measures available to PT INL in addressing the challenges associated with implementing the Minyakita program. The study adopts a normative-empirical legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that the HET policy has not been fully effective due to fluctuating CPO prices and high production costs, which impose significant financial burdens on producers. Consequently, a more realistic adjustment of the HET is necessary, alongside stronger enforcement mechanisms against distribution violations and the optimization of digital monitoring systems such as SIMIRAH. These measures are crucial to achieving a balance between producer interests and consumer protection.
Legal Study On Foreign Ownership In The Oil Palm Plantation Sector From The Perspective Of Indonesia’s Economic Sovereignty Situmorang, Patricia Catheleene Joty; Sukarja, Detania; Robert, Robert
Ultimate Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Law and Society
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/uljls.v2i2.23450

Abstract

Palm oil plantations are a leading Indonesian commodity with a strategic role. Foreign investment activities are subject to Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning Investment and Presidential Regulation No. 10 of 2021, which was later amended by Presidential Regulation No. 49 of 2021. Under these regulations, palm oil plantations do not require restrictions on capital ownership, meaning they can be fully owned by foreigners. This research addresses the legal aspects of foreign investment in the palm oil plantation sector, examines whether the size of foreign ownership correlates with the challenges posed by palm oil plantations, and examines whether existing regulations regarding Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), particularly in the palm oil plantation sector, are effective in ensuring economic sovereignty. Using normative legal research methods. The results indicate that the environmental and social impacts of palm oil plantations are not directly correlated with the company's ownership structure but rather relate to the company's operational practices and approach to local communities. Furthermore, although the state does not limit the size of foreign capital ownership, its presence in maintaining economic sovereignty is manifested in policies related to restrictions and obligations, such as those related to land rights, where investors can only hold a Cultivation Use Rights (HGU) for a specific period, and obligations regarding plasma plantation development and land allocation. This research also shows that regulations in oil palm plantations still require improvement to address overlapping and disharmonious regulations.