Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.493
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal EUGENIA Jurnal Teknik Sipil DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal Analytica Islamica JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH JURNAL MERCATORIA Jurnal Borneo Humaniora JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum NOMOI Law Review Narra J Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Journal of Social Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) International Journal of Application on Economics and Business Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Binamulia Hukum ULJLS
Robert Robert
FTI Tarumanagara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTOR YANG GAGAL MELAKUKAN DUE DILIGENCE SEHINGGA TERJEBAK INVESTASI BODONG Suryani, Ummi; Sirait, Ningrum N.; Robert, Robert
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4718

Abstract

Abstract: Due diligence prior to investing, whether conducted independenly by investors or with the assistance of legal consultants, is a form of precautionary action to avoid fraudulent/illegal invesments. The Financial Services Authority’s efforts in preventing fraudulent/illegal invesment through socialization and education to the public are essential for ensuring legal protection for investors. The methodology employed in this thesis is a normative juridical research method, which refers to legal norms and is conducted through library research. This study is descriptive in nature, and the data analysis method used is qualitative. The research findings reveal that the legal aspect of due diligence by investors in invesment activities involves the participation of legal consultants, with the investor acting as the implementer of the due diligence process. This is done to assess and consider invesment opportunies, thus preventing involvement in fraudulent invesments. The Financial Services Authority’s actions in regulating and supervising investors to perform due diligence in order to prevent fraudulent invesments are in accordance with Law  Number 4 of 2023 on the Development and Strengthening of the Fnancial Sector, amending Law Number 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authory. Legal protection for investors who fail to conduct due diligence and fall victim to fraudulent invesments can be viewed from the perspective of personal responsibility and the responsibility of the legal consultants if their services were utilized. Keyword: Invesment, Due Diligence, Legal Protection Abstrak: Due diligence dapat dilakukan oleh investor secara mandiri dan menggunakan jasa konsultan hukum adalah sebagai bentuk tindakan investor agar terhindar dari investasi bodong/illegal. Tindakan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam pencegahan investasi bodong/illegal dengan cara sosialisasi dan edukasi kepada masyarakat, sehingga perlindungan hukum terhadap investor dapat dilaksanakan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normative, yaitu metode yang mengacu pada norma hukum yang dilakukan dengan studi Pustaka. Penelitian ini memiliki sifat deskriptif. Metode Analisa data yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa aspek hukum pelaksanaan due diligence oleh investor dalam kegiatan investasi adalah dengan melibatkan konsultan hukum dan investor sebagai pelaksana dari proses due diligence tersebut. Hal ini dilakukan untuk pemeriksaan dan pertimbangan investor agar terhindar dari investasi bodong. Tindakan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam menerapkan pegaturan dan pengawasan investor dalam melaksanakan due diligence untuk mencegah investasi bodong adalah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan atas Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuagan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap investor yang gagal melakukan due diligence sehingga terjebak investasi bodong dapat dilihat dari segi tanggungjawab mandiri dan tanggungjawab konsultan hukum apabila menggunakan jasa konsultan hukum. Kata kunci: Investasi, Due Diligence, Perlindungan Hukum  
Legal Challenges of PT Industri Nabati Lestari in Stabilizing National Cooking Oil Prices through the Minyakita Program: An Analysis of Price Increases Exceeding the Highest Retail Price Tarigan, Klaudius Epikuri Loga; Sukarja, Detania; Robert, Robert
Ultimate Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Law and Society
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/uljls.v2i2.23349

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of price increases in Minyakita, a government-sponsored affordable cooking oil program, which have exceeded the Highest Retail Price (HET) set under Ministry of Trade Regulation No. 18 of 2024. The Minyakita program, involving PT Industri Nabati Lestari (INL), was introduced to stabilize national cooking oil prices and ensure consumer protection. However, field observations indicate distribution violations, hoarding practices, and sales above the regulated HET. This research analyzes the legal aspects of the Domestic Market Obligation (DMO), the effectiveness of HET regulation from the perspective of consumer protection under Law No. 8 of 1999, and the legal measures available to PT INL in addressing the challenges associated with implementing the Minyakita program. The study adopts a normative-empirical legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that the HET policy has not been fully effective due to fluctuating CPO prices and high production costs, which impose significant financial burdens on producers. Consequently, a more realistic adjustment of the HET is necessary, alongside stronger enforcement mechanisms against distribution violations and the optimization of digital monitoring systems such as SIMIRAH. These measures are crucial to achieving a balance between producer interests and consumer protection.
Legal Study On Foreign Ownership In The Oil Palm Plantation Sector From The Perspective Of Indonesia’s Economic Sovereignty Situmorang, Patricia Catheleene Joty; Sukarja, Detania; Robert, Robert
Ultimate Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Law and Society
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/uljls.v2i2.23450

Abstract

Palm oil plantations are a leading Indonesian commodity with a strategic role. Foreign investment activities are subject to Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning Investment and Presidential Regulation No. 10 of 2021, which was later amended by Presidential Regulation No. 49 of 2021. Under these regulations, palm oil plantations do not require restrictions on capital ownership, meaning they can be fully owned by foreigners. This research addresses the legal aspects of foreign investment in the palm oil plantation sector, examines whether the size of foreign ownership correlates with the challenges posed by palm oil plantations, and examines whether existing regulations regarding Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), particularly in the palm oil plantation sector, are effective in ensuring economic sovereignty. Using normative legal research methods. The results indicate that the environmental and social impacts of palm oil plantations are not directly correlated with the company's ownership structure but rather relate to the company's operational practices and approach to local communities. Furthermore, although the state does not limit the size of foreign capital ownership, its presence in maintaining economic sovereignty is manifested in policies related to restrictions and obligations, such as those related to land rights, where investors can only hold a Cultivation Use Rights (HGU) for a specific period, and obligations regarding plasma plantation development and land allocation. This research also shows that regulations in oil palm plantations still require improvement to address overlapping and disharmonious regulations.  
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Kewenangan Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) Sebagai Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia Kennedy, Kennedy; Sunarmi, Sunarmi; Robert, Robert
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6511

Abstract

Kewenangan BHP sebagai Pengurus dalam perkara PKPU di Indonesia masih belum jelas. Undang-undang PKPU telah mengatur mengenai siapa saja yang dapat diangkat menjadi Pengurus. Ketentuan tersebut dapat dilihat dari Pasal 234 ayat 3 UU PKPU. Dalam Pasal tersebut sudah disebutkan secara jelas mengenai siapa saja yang dapat diangkat menjadi Pengurus PKPU yaitu Orang Perseorangan yang berdomisili di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia. Permasalahan adlaah Bagaimana Ketentuan Hukum terhadap Penetapan Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia? Bagaimana Kewenangan Balai harta Peninggalan sebagai Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia? Bagaimana kepastian hukum terhadap kewenangan Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam perkara PKPU. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penlitian normatif dengan berdasar pada data sekunder dari hasil analisis diketahui penerapannya di lapangan terdapat 3 putusan dimana Hakim pada Pengadilan Niaga menunjuk Balai Harta Peninggalan sebagai pengurus dalam perkara PKPU yaitu nomor 33/pdt sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan ; nomor 4/pdt sus-PKPU/2023/PN Niaga Medan dan nomor 22/pdt/sus-PKPU/2020 PN Niaga Medan. Dalam hal ini 3 putusan Hakim menafsirkan bahwa BHP juga berwenang melakukan tugas pengurusan sebagaimana bunyi dari Pasal 69 ayat 1 angka 5 dimana kata pengurusan dianggap sama seperti Pengurus dalam perkara PKPU.
THE AUTHORITY OF THE CURATOR IN GENERAL SEIZURE OVER UNPAID PRELIMINARY SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT (PPJB) OBJECTS IN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BANKRUPTCY (A STUDY OF COMMERCIAL COURT DECISION NO. 29/PDT.SUS-GLL/2022/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) Silitonga, Artanti; Sunarmi, Sunarmi; Robert, Robert
Journal Analytica Islamica Vol 15, No 1 (2026): ANALYTICA ISLAMICA
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/jai.v14i3.27986

Abstract

This study examines the authority of curators in enforcing general seizure (sita umum) over objects of Sale and Purchase Binding Agreements (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli/PPJB) that have not been fully paid in the bankruptcy of a Limited Liability Company, based on the Commercial Court Decision No. 29/Pdt.Sus-GLL/2022/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The main issue addressed is whether unpaid PPJB objects may be included in the bankruptcy estate (boedel pailit) and the extent of the curator's authority in managing and settling such objects. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches by analyzing Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, along with relevant court decisions. The findings indicate that unpaid PPJB objects are, in principle, part of the bankruptcy estate since ownership rights have not been fully transferred, thereby granting the curator authority to impose general seizure and conduct management and settlement actions. Nevertheless, the exercise of such authority must consider the principles of justice and legal protection for good-faith buyers. The court's decision clarifies the legal standing of PPJB in bankruptcy proceedings and delineates the scope of the curator's authority.
IMPLIKASI HUKUM KETIDAKAKTIFAN KOPERASI TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PENGURUS: STUDI PADA DINAS PERDAGANGAN DAN KOPERASI UKM KABUPATEN LABUHANBATU UTARA Rizki , Sauki; Sukarja, Detania; Robert, Robert
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v5i3.4370

Abstract

The inactivity of cooperatives constitutes a significant legal issue, particularly in relation to the accountability of cooperative management. Although an inactive cooperative no longer conducts business activities, it legally remains a corporate entity as long as its dissolution has not been formally executed in accordance with statutory provisions. This condition creates legal uncertainty, as cooperatives are expected to continuously perform their economic and social functions. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of cooperative inactivity on the liability of cooperative managers and to examine the role of the Department of Trade and Cooperatives for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Labuhanbatu Utara Regency in supervising and fostering inactive cooperatives. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by empirical data, obtained through document analysis and interviews, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the inactive status of a cooperative does not eliminate the legal and civil liability of its management. Cooperative managers remain responsible for the management and administration of the cooperative as stipulated in Articles 31 and 34 of Law Number 25 of 1992 on Cooperatives, particularly when losses arise due to negligence or intentional misconduct. Furthermore, the Department of Trade and Cooperatives for MSMEs plays a strategic role through guidance, supervision, governance assistance, capacity building for managers, and periodic monitoring and evaluation. These efforts aim to encourage cooperative revitalization or, where necessary, lawful dissolution to ensure legal certainty, protect members and third parties, and promote sustainable cooperative development.
ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KEBIJAKAN PEMBERIAN INSENTIF BAGI PERUSAHAAN YANG MELAKSANAKAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DAN LINGKUNGAN Abdi, Aiko Alamnasroh; Sirait, Ningrum Natasya; Robert, Robert
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 9, No 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5933

Abstract

Abstract: The obligation to implement Social and Environmental Responsibility (TJSL) in Indonesia has been regulated by law, but regulations regarding the provision of incentives for companies that implement it have not been comprehensively formulated. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness of TJSL policies in encouraging corporate compliance while increasing the attractiveness of national investment. This study aims to analyze the regulation of TJSL incentives in the Indonesian legal system, assess the urgency of providing incentives from the perspective of legal certainty and ease of doing business, and compare them with policies implemented in Singapore. This study is a normative legal study with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using the theory of legal certainty, development law theory, and comparative law theory as analytical frameworks. This study shows that the regulation of TJSL incentives in Indonesia is still limited, not systematically integrated with investment and ease of doing business policies, and has not been designed as a strategic instrument to encourage optimal corporate participation. In contrast, Singapore implements a more structured approach through a combination of fiscal and non-fiscal incentives aligned with sustainable development policies and improving the investment climate. Therefore, reformulating CSR incentive policies in Indonesia is necessary to create legal certainty, increase the effectiveness of CSR implementation, and strengthen national competitiveness and investment attractiveness. The formulation of clear, measurable, and integrated incentives will make CSR not only a legal obligation but also a strategic instrument for sustainable economic development. Keywords: Social and Environmental Responsibility, Incentives, Legal Certainty, Ease of Doing Business, Comparative Law. Abstrak: Kewajiban pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan (TJSL) di Indonesia telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, namun pengaturan mengenai pemberian insentif bagi perusahaan yang melaksanakannya belum dirumuskan secara komprehensif. Kondisi ini menimbulkan persoalan mengenai efektivitas kebijakan TJSL dalam mendorong kepatuhan korporasi sekaligus meningkatkan daya tarik investasi nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan insentif TJSL dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, menilai urgensi pemberian insentif dalam perspektif kepastian hukum dan kemudahan berusaha, serta membandingkannya dengan kebijakan yang diterapkan di Singapura.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan menggunakan teori kepastian hukum, teori hukum pembangunan, dan teori perbandingan hukum sebagai kerangka analisis. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan insentif TJSL di Indonesia masih bersifat terbatas, tidak terintegrasi secara sistematis dengan kebijakan investasi dan kemudahan berusaha, serta belum dirancang sebagai instrumen strategis untuk mendorong partisipasi korporasi secara optimal. Sebaliknya, Singapura menerapkan pendekatan yang lebih terstruktur melalui kombinasi insentif fiskal dan non-fiskal yang selaras dengan kebijakan pembangunan berkelanjutan dan peningkatan iklim investasi. Atas dasar hal tersebut reformulasi kebijakan insentif TJSL di Indonesia diperlukan guna menciptakan kepastian hukum, meningkatkan efektivitas pelaksanaan TJSL, serta memperkuat daya saing dan daya tarik investasi nasional. Perumusan insentif yang jelas, terukur, dan terintegrasi akan menjadikan TJSL tidak hanya sebagai kewajiban hukum, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen strategis pembangunan ekonomi berkelanjutan. Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan, Insentif, Kepastian Hukum, Kemudahan Berusaha, Perbandingan Hukum.
Co-Authors Abdi, Aiko Alamnasroh Adiputra, I Gede Adli Fahmi Lubis, Muhammad Agustono Ariska, Jeffrey Ahmad, Muhammad Taufik Habibillah Ibnu Alvi Syahrin Ayu Wulandari Damanik, Wiwin Bella Azigna Purnama Brodjonegoro, Sakti R. Budi Mulyadi BUDIMAN GINTING Danial, M Meddy Dicky M. Rizal, Dicky M. Dwiaji, Iqbal W. Febriyanto, Toni Gustaf Hutabarat, Andy Helyanto, Helyanto Hendri, Ahmad Z. Heriyanto, Didik S. Hutabarat, Andy Gustaf Hutagalung, Jessica Imelda Putri Johannes E. X. Rogi Kennedy, Kennedy Lantang, Evayanti Tirtania Lemmy, Muhammad Ilham Akbar Liliana, Belinda Luzman, Raedi A. Mahmud Mulyadi MAHMUL SIREGAR Mardiah S. Hardianti N, Jimmy NINGRUM NATASYA SIRAIT Nur Arfian, Nur Nurhayati Nurhayati Pasaribu, Hendri Goklas Pikatan, Narpati W. Pratama, Angga DM. Rizki , Sauki S. D. Runtunuwu Sarpawi, Sarpawi Shaleh, Sabillal Silitonga, Artanti Sirait, Ningrum N. Situmorang, Patricia Catheleene Joty Sri Suryawati Sukarja, Detania Sunarmi Sunarmi Suryani, Ummi Tarigan, Klaudius Epikuri Loga Utama, Rizki Angga Yefta Pamandungan Yogahutama, Noka