Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.351
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bestuur Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Konstitusi PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Constitutional Review Lex Scientia Law Review Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Jurnal Konstitusi International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS) TEKAD : Teknik Mengabdi Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Muchamad Ali Safaat
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Urban Farming for Food Security Enhancement in Tunjungsekar Using a 3D-FDM Selective Compliance Articulated Robot Arm Maulana, Eka; Nabawi, Naufal; Nusantoro, Goegoes Dwi; Safa'at, Muchamad Ali
TEKAD : Teknik Mengabdi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.tekad.2026.05.1.3

Abstract

Indonesia faces significant food security challenges driven by rapid population growth, urbanization, and agricultural land conversion. Malang City, with a dense population and ranked 42nd in the national Food Security Index (IKP), requires innovative approaches to strengthen urban agriculture. This community service program, conducted in Tunjungsekar Village, Lowokwaru District, introduced a modern urban farming system as a practical solution. The implementation included the construction of an ergonomic greenhouse using galvanum hollow and esther steel frames, along with the deployment of a 3D-FDM-based SCARA robot integrated with kinematics, PID control, and the Internet of Things (IoT) for automated irrigation and plant care. The results demonstrated a 40% increase in community participation from the initial discussion phase to installation, reflecting growing awareness and enthusiasm toward urban farming practices. This innovation not only improved efficiency and productivity but also contributed directly to the enhancement of Malang City’s Food Security Index. Furthermore, the robotic urban farming model is expected to be replicated in other urban areas as a strategic effort to support national food self-sufficiency programs and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The Existence of Amicus Curiae in Constitutional Court Decisions: A Participation Theory Perspective Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum; Muchamad Ali Safa’at; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.429

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis peran dan dampak amicus curiae dalam mendorong proses peradilan yang partisipatif di Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui teori partisipasi. Sebagai mekanisme non-litigasi, amicus curiae memperkaya perspektif peradilan, khususnya dalam kasus-kasus kepentingan publik, dengan memberikan pandangan hukum yang imparsial. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa amicus curiae meningkatkan kualitas putusan, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas, sehingga memperkuat peran Mahkamah dalam mempromosikan sistem hukum yang demokratis dan inklusif. Penelitian ini menyoroti bagaimana amicus curiae mendukung proses peradilan yang partisipatif di Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan menggunakan teori partisipasi. Awalnya berkembang dalam perencanaan kota, teori ini menekankan pada inklusivitas dan akuntabilitas dalam pengambilan keputusan. Diakui dalam Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, amicus curiae memberikan pandangan imparsial yang berbeda dari Para Pihak Terkait, sehingga memastikan keterwakilan masyarakat yang beragam dalam proses hukum. Kehadiran amicus curiae meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan kualitas putusan peradilan. Teori partisipasi selaras dengan perannya dalam mendorong masukan publik yang beragam untuk mencapai hasil hukum yang seimbang. Kasus-kasus penting, seperti persidangan Soeharto, menunjukkan nilai praktisnya dalam memastikan keadilan peradilan. Institusionalisasi amicus curiae memperkuat nilai-nilai demokrasi dan partisipasi publik dalam peradilan. Amicus curiae memainkan peran strategis dalam meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan inklusivitas peradilan di Mahkamah Konstitusi.Kata kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Amicus curiae, Partisipasi Publik, Transparansi, Akuntabilitas This study analyzes the role and impact of amicus curiae in fostering participatory judicial processes within the Constitutional Court through participation theory. As a non-litigation mechanism, amicus curiae enrich judicial perspectives, particularly in cases of public interest, by providing impartial legal insights. Findings reveal that amicus curiae enhances decision quality, transparency, and accountability, reinforcing the Court’s role in promoting a democratic and inclusive legal system. This study highlights how amicus curiae support participatory judicial processes within the Constitutional Court, using participation theory. Initially rooted in urban planning, this theory emphasizes inclusivity and accountability in decision-making. Recognized under Article 5 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009, amicus curiae provide impartial insights distinct from Related Parties, ensuring diverse societal representation in legal processes. The inclusion of amicus curiae enhances judicial transparency, accountability, and decision quality. Participation theory aligns with its role in fostering diverse public input for balanced legal outcomes. Notable cases, such as the Soeharto trial, demonstrate its practical value in ensuring judicial fairness. Institutionalizing amicus curiae strengthens democratic values and public participation in the judiciary. Amicus curiae plays a strategic role in enhancing judicial transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in the Constitutional Court. Its alignment with participation theory underscores its importance in promoting constitutional justice and addressing public interest cases.Keywords: Constitutional Court; Amicus curiae; Public Participation, Transparency, Accountability
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Aan Eko Widiarto Adithya Tri Firmansyah R Agnes Harvelian Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri Arssa, Ria Casmi Demas Brian W Dhenasya Sukma Hardaningtyas Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Dhia Al-Uyun Elfa Murdiana Fadli, Moh. Fajar Laksono Fajar Laksono Suroso Fajar Laksono Suroso, Fajar Laksono Fatih, Sholahuddin Al Goegoes Dwi Nusantoro I Dewa Gde Mayun Permana I Nyoman Nurjaya Indah Dwi Qurbani Mardian Wibowo Maulana, Eka Milda Istiqomah Muhammad Nur Nabawi, Naufal Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Nurul Aprianti Rachmad Safa’at Rahmat, Al Fauzi Rahmatika, Nur Auliya Rayhan, Alendra Nauval Mufti Riana Susmayanti Shinta Hadiyantina Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sudarsono Sudarsono Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Uyun, Dhia Al