Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Ulum

Judicial Disparities in Asset Confiscation Rulings in Online Trading Cases in Indonesia: A Maqashid al-Shariah Analysis Sahnaz Kartika; Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution; Hasan Matsum
Al-Ulum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024): Al-Ulum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/au.v24i1.6900

Abstract

This study examines the disparity in court rulings concerning the status of confiscated assets in online trading crime cases. The Banten High Court Decision No. 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT BTN ordered the return of assets to victims, whereas the Bandung High Court Decision No. 1/Pid.Sus/2023/PT BDG ruled that such assets be confiscated for the state. This divergence generates legal uncertainty and raises fundamental questions of justice. The research aims to critically assess the extent to which these rulings are consistent with the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, particularly the principle of ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of property). A normative legal approach is employed, drawing on statutory analysis, judicial decisions, and comparative perspectives. The findings indicate that the Banten ruling more closely reflects ḥifẓ al-māl by safeguarding victims’ property rights, while the Bandung ruling risks undermining justice, as the state did not directly incur losses. Beyond highlighting this jurisprudential inconsistency, the study underscores the urgency of harmonizing regulatory frameworks so that the principle of ḥifẓ al-māl can be systematically integrated into Indonesian criminal justice practice, thereby advancing substantive justice and strengthening public trust in the law.
Idealitas Pancasila dan Realitas Maqashid Syariah Miskari; Mhd. Syahnan; Hasan Matsum
Al-Ulum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023): Al-ULum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/au.v23i2.4234

Abstract

This study discusses the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, which is not a religious state, but the Pancasila, produced based on a formulation of taste, nobility, customs, culture, religion, and beliefs that exist and grow in Indonesia. Because Pancasila was born from the womb of the Indonesian nation, even though the majority of the population is Muslim, Pancasila has succeeded in establishing itself as the basis of the state, state philosophy, and state ideology for many years now. It shows how powerful and great Pancasila is. However, recently, Pancasila has again clashed with Islam. Pancasila is considered a taghut system, created by infidels, and a secular system that is no longer relevant to the life of the Indonesian nation, which is predominantly Muslim. This research uses a qualitative approach with literature research methods. Primary and secondary data are from books, articles, news, and journals. The theory used in this research is the maqashid sharia approach as a cognitive, open, comprehensive, hierarchical, multidimensional, and purposeful system. Hence, it is found that the ideality of Pancasila rests on the reality of the Indonesian nation's activities in implementing the substantive values of Pancasila and Islam, not on its format. So, it was found that Pancasila and Islam met simultaneously in protecting their people, especially in protecting religion, soul, reason, property, lineage, and honor.