Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI SIKAP ILMIAH PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMA DI KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Endang Sri Handayani; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw with the concept map, cooperative learning model Jigsaw without a concept map, and the direct instruction model with a review of the scientific attitude of students towards learning achievement. This type of research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. This research was implemented in the month of September 2013 to November 2013. The X grade students of Senior High School in Kudus Regency with 2013/2014 academic year was the population of this research. The instrument used to collect the data were UAN, scientific attitude questionnaire, and mathematics achievement tests with the topic of quadratic equation in the form of multiple choice. Test requirements include test data analysis used Lilliefors test for normality and homogeneity test used the Bartlett test. Analysis of the data used two-way variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusion of this study were: (1) cooperative learning model Jigsaw with the concept map has better mathematics learning achievement than the cooperative learning model Jigsaw without a concept map and the direct instruction model, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw without a concept map has mathematics learning achievement as good as the direct instruction model; (2) the high scientific attitude students have better mathematics learning achievement than the medium and low scientific attitude students, the medium scientific attitude student have mathematics learning achievement as good as the low scientific attitude students; (3) there is no interaction between learning model to the level of scientific attitude of students towards mathematics learning achievement; (4) there is no difference between the learning achievement of students in each level of the scientific attitude for each learning model.Keywords: cooperative learning model , Jigsaw , concept maps , scientific attitude

ANALISIS BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN POLYA PADA POKOK BAHASAN PERSAMAAN KUADRAT (Penelitian pada Siswa Kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sragen Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014) Harlinda Fatmawati; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Triyanto Triyanto
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract : This research aims were to describe: (1) students’ level of critical thinking, (2) students’ process of critical thinking in problem solving based on Polya, (3) factors influencing students’ process of critical thinking. This was a descriptive qualitative research. Subject of the research was students grade X AP 1 of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sragen consisting of four students. Subject was selected using purposive sampling. Instrument of collecting data were observation, problem solving test and interview. Validity of the data was tested using triangulation method. The data were analyzed by: (1) classifying the data in level of critical thinking based on indicators of critical thinking stated by Ennis; (2) analyzing each critical thinking level based on four steps of Polya’s problem solving; (3) analyzing factors influencing students’ process of critical thinking. From the research on 36 students, the results of students’ level of critical thinking are 19.4% for critical thinking level 0, 72.2% for critical thinking level 1, 5.6% for critical thinking level 2 and 2.8% for critical thinking level 3. Students’ process of critical thinking in (a) understanding problems, critical thinking level 0 was not able to construct point of the problems and reveal the facts, critical thinking level 1, 2, and 3 were able to construct point of the problems and reveal the facts; (b) making a plan, critical thinking level 0 was not able to detect the bias and determine theorem in solving problems, critical thinking level 1 was not able to detect the bias but was able to theorem in solving problems, critical thinking level 2 and 3 were able to detect the bias and determine theorem in solving problems; (c) carrying out the plan, critical thinking level 0 was not able to solve problems as the planning, critical thinking level 1, 2 and 3 were able to solve problems as the planning; (d) looking back the completed solution, critical thinking level 0 and 1 were not able to select logical argument and to draw conclusion, however, critical thinking level 1 was able to solve the problems using another method, critical thinking level 2 was not quite able to select logical argument and to draw conclusion, but it was able to solve the problems using another method, and critical thinking level 3 was able to select logical argument, to draw conclusion and to solve the problems using another method. Factors influencing students’ process of critical thinking are students were not accustomed to solve story problems so that they were not able to understand the problems, students found it difficult to construct Mathematics model, and students were accustomed to solve questions using only one method.Key words: Critical thinking, Polya’s problem solving, Process of critical thinking, Level of critical thinking.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH PADA POKOK BAHASAN LIMIT FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT PESERTA DIDIK SMA NEGERI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Dian Ratna Ariyani; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract : The purposes of the research were to know: (1) which learning models -think pair share cooperative learning model with scientific approach (TPS SA), think pair share cooperative learning (TPS), and direct learning model (DL)-that will give the best learning mathematics result; (2) which level of students adversity quotient (AQ) -quitter, camper, and climber-that will give the best mathematics learning result; (3) which learning models -TPS SA, TPS, and DL- that will give the best learning mathematics result at categories AQ; (4) which level of students AQ -quitter, camper and climber- that will give the best learning mathematics result at categories learning models. The research used a quasi-experimental designed with population was all students of eleventh grade science in Banyumas in the academic year 2013/2014. The technique sampling was stratified cluster random sampling. The instrument used to collect the data was a questionnaire of AQ and math achievement tests. Hypothesis test used two way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the analysis we concluded: (1) TPS SA provided a better learning achievement than only TPS and direct learning, TPS provided a better learning achievement than direct learning; (2) climber students had a better learning achievement than camper and quitter, camper had a better learning achievement than a quitter; (3) for climber students, TPS SA, TPS, and direct learning provided the same good learning performance, for camper students, TPS SA provided a better learning achievement than TPS and direct learning, TPS provided a better learning achievement than direct learning, for quitter students, TPS SA, TPS, and direct learning provided the same good learning performance; (4) in TPS SA, climber students had an academic achievement as good as camper students, climber students had a better learning achievement than quitter students, camper students had a better learning achievement than quitter students, in TPS, climber students had a better learning achievement than quitter and camper, camper students had a better learning achievement than quitter, in direct learning, climber students had a better learning achievement than quitter and camper, camper students had academic achievement as good as quitter.Keywords: Cooperative Learning, Scientific Approach, Think Pair Share with scientific approach, Adversity Quotient (AQ).

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN STRATEGI PETA KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL SISWA Westi Bilda; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Gatut Iswahyudi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the spatial intelligence students. The type of this research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of the VIII class of MTsN Ngawi Regency in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of the research consisted of 314 students and were taken through stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used were spatial intelligence test and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1) NHT and mind concept gives better mathematics achievement than NHT model and direct learning model, and NHT model gives the same mathematics achievement as direct learning. 2) The high spatial intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than midlle and low spatial intelligence students, midlle spatial intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than low spatial intelligence students, 3) For NHT and mind concept and NHT, students having high, moderate and low spatial intelligence have the same achievement. For direct learning model, students having high spatial intelligence had better achievement than students having moderate and low, then, students having moderate spatial intelligence have better achievement than students having low spatial intelligence. 4) For students having high and moderate spatial intelligence NHT and mind mapping concept model, NHT and direct instructionl model have the same effect toward students’ achievement. For students having low spatial intelligence, NHT and mind concept gives better learning achievement than NHT. NHT gives better learning achievement than direct learning model. NHT gives the same learning achievement as direct learning model.Keywords: NHT, mind mapping concept, spatial intelligence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL), DAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING (CL) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA Berti Okta Sari; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the PBL, DL, and CL models results in a better achievement in mathematics; (2) which students of the students with high, moderate, and low interpersonal intelligences have a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each interpersonal intelligence, which learning model of the PBL, DL, and CL models results in a better achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students of the students with high, moderate, and low interpersonal intelligences have a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Bengkulu Selatan Regency, Bengkulu Province in Academic Year 2014/2015. The samples of research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The balance test of research used the one-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The pre-requisite test of ANAVA used Lilliefors’s normality test, Bartlett’s homogeneity test. The proposed hypotheses of research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of research are as follows: 1) the PBL model results in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the DL and CL models, and the DL model results in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the CL model; 2) the students with the high interpersonal intelligence have a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low interpersonal intelligences, and the students with the moderate interpersonal intelligence have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low interpersonal intelligence; 3) in each interpersonal intelligence level, the PBL model results in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the DL and CL models, and the DL model results in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the CL model; 4) in each learning model, the students with the high interpersonal intelligence have a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low interpersonal intelligences, and the students with the moderate interpersonal intelligence have a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low interpersonal intelligence.Keywords: Problem-based learning, discovery learning, cooperative learning, interpersonal intelligence, learning achievement in Mathematics

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBER HEAD TOGETHER (NHT), JIGSAW II DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Stefy Erlinda Novalia; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on student’s mathematics achievement viewed from emotional quotient. The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Jigsaw II, and TPS. This research was a quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all of the eighth grade students of the State Junior High School in Sukoharjo. The instrumentsused to collect data were mathematics achievement and emotional quotient questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. From the research, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Learning by using cooperative learning model of Jigsaw II and NHT gave better mathematics learning achievement than learning by using cooperative learning model of TPS, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT gave better mathematics learning achievement than learning by using cooperative learning model of TPS. (2) Students who have high emotional quotient gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have middle and low emotional quotient, students who have middle emotional quotient gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low emotional quotient, (3) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw II, students who have high and middle emotional quotient gave better mathematics learning achievement with the students who have low emotional quotient. On the cooperative learning model of NHT, students who have high emotional quotient gave better mathematics learning achievement with the students who have low emotional quotient. On the cooperative learning model of TPS, students who have high, middle and low emotional quotient gave the same mathematics learning achievement. (4) On the high emotional quotient, using cooperative learning model of learning by Jigsaw II, NHT and TPS gave the same mathematics learning achievement. On the middle emotional quotient, using cooperative learning model of learning by Jigsaw II gave better mathematics learning achievement with learning by using cooperative learning model of TPS. On the low emotional quotient, using cooperative learning model of learning by Jigsaw II, NHT and TPS gave the same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Cooperative learning model, Jigsaw II, NHT, TPS, mathematics learning achievement, emotional quotient.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) BERBANTUAN WINPLOT DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI APLIKASI TURUNAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA Wawan Wawan; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Gatut Iswahyudi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the reasoning abilities of the students. The models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 × 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of Senior Secondary Schools of Purworejo in academic year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 235 students consisted of 80 students in the first experimental class, 77 students in the second experimental class and 78 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and test of mathematical reasoning ability. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) The students with the high mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low mathematical reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning ability. (3) In each mathematical reasoning ability category, the cooperative learning model of the Winplot-assisted STAD type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (4) In each learning model, the students with the high mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the moderate and low mathematical reasoning abilities, and the students with the moderate mathematical reasoning ability had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those with the low mathematical reasoning ability.Keywords: STAD, Winplot, TAI, direct learning, mathematical reasoning, and learning achievement in mathematics.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK PESERTA DIDIK Santi Widyawati; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Gatut Iswahyudi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the TSTS model, the NHT model, and the direct learning model resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (2) which students of the students with mathematical-logical, interpersonal, and linguistic intelligence had a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each category of the multiple intelligences, which learning model of the TSTS model, the NHT model, and the direct learning model resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students of the students with mathematical-logical, interpersonal and linguistic intelligence had a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of Junior Secondary Schools of Metro City. The size of the samples was 269 students. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and questionnaire of multiple intelligences. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The TSTS model resulted in a better learning achievement than the NHT model and direct model, and the NHT model resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2) The students with mathematical-logical intelligence had a better learning achievement than those with interpersonal and linguistic intelligences, and the students with interpersonal intelligence had a better learning achievement than those with linguistic intelligence. 3) In the students with mathematical-logical intelligence, the TSTS model resulted in a better learning achievement than the cooperative learning model of the NHT model, the TSTS model and the NHT model resulted in the same learning achievement as the direct learning model. In the students with interpersonal intelligence, the TSTS model resulted in the same learning achievement as the NHT and direct learning models, and the NHT model resulted in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. In the students with linguistic intelligence, the TSTS and the NHT model sresulted in the same learning achievement as the direct learning model. 4) In the TSTS model, the students with mathematical-logical intelligence had the same learning achievement as those with interpersonal intelligence but had a better learning achievement than those with linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence had the same learning achievement those with linguistic intelligence. In the NHT model, the students with mathematical-logical, interpersonal, and linguistic intelligences had the same learning achievement. In the direct learning model, the students with mathematical-logical intelligence had a better learning achievement than those with interpersonal and linguistic intelligences, and the students with interpersonal intelligence had the same learning achievement as those with linguistic intelligence. Keywords: TSTS, NHT, multiple intelligences.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH PADA POKOK BAHASAN TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMA SE-KOTA SALATIGA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Kristin Yulianti; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to know: (1) which learning models - discovery learning, problem based learning and direct learning model - that will give the best learning mathematics result; (2) which level of students creativity- high, medium, or low- that will give te best mathematics learning result; (3) which learning models - discovery learning, problem based learning and direct learning model - that will give the best learning mathematics result in each creativity categories; (4) which level of students creativity- high, medium, or low- that will give the best mathematics learning result in each learning models. The research used a quasi-experimental designed by using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell sizes. The population of this research are all X grade students of Senior High School in Salatiga 2013/2014. The sampling technique being used in this research was stratified cluster random sampling. The results show as follows. (1) Mathematics learning achievement using guided discovery model and problem based model show similar result which is better than using direct learning model. (2) Students with high level of creativity show better learning achievement than those of low level creativity. Students with high and medium level of creativity show the same learning achievement. Students with medium and low level of creativity show the same learning achievement. (3) On students with high level of creativity, guided discovery and problem based learning models show the same result, and guided discovery learning model results in better achievement compares to direct learning model. Problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. On students with medium level of creativity, guided discovery, problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. On students with low level of creativity, guided discovery, problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. (4) In guided discovery model, students with high and medium level of creativity show the same learning achievement, however students with high level of creativity have better achievement than students with low level of creativity. Students with medium and low level of creativity show the same learning achievement. Using problem based learning model, students with high, medium and low level of creativity show the same achievement. In direct learning model, the result of the three creativity categories also show the same learning achievement.Keywords: guided discovery model, problem based learning model, creativity

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI (TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION) BERBANTU MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN ADOBE FLASH 8.0 PADA MATERI POKOK SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/20 Intan Novia Sari; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one of the learning model gave a better achievement between of the TAI assisted by adobe flash 8.0, TAI, and conventional; (2) which one of the students with students learning motivation categories had a better achievement between students with high, moderate or low learning motivation; (3) in each the students learning motivation categories, which one of the learning models gave a better achievement in mathematics between TAI assisted by adobe flash 8.0, TAI, or conventional; (4) in each the learning models, which one of the students learning motivation had a better achievement in mathematics between the students with high, moderate, or low students learning motivation.The type of the research was a quasi experimental research method. The population of the research was the seventh class students of State Junior Secondary School at Sukoharjo regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. They were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and questionnaire of the students learning motivation. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TAI assisted by adobe flash 8.0 results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TAI and conventional, the TAI model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than conventional. 2) The students with the high learning motivation had the same achievement as the students with moderate learning motivation, the students with the moderate learning motivation had the same achievement as the students with low learning motivation and the students with the high learning motivation had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the students with low learning motivation. 3) In each students learning motivation, the TAI assisted by adobe flash 8.0 results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TAI and conventional, the TAI model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than conventional. 4) In each learning model, the students with the high learning motivation had the same achievement as the students with moderate learning motivation, the students with the moderate learning motivation had the same achievement as the students with low learning motivation and the students with the high learning motivation had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the students with low learning motivation.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization model, Adobe Flash 8.0, and students learning motivation.

Title

Found 53 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 53 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 53 Documents
Search