Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Mardiyana Mardiyana
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Education Mathematics

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 53 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING (RT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMA/MA NEGERIDI KABUPATEN KETAPANG PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT Rahman Haryadi; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate:  (1) which learning model produces students’ better mathematics learning achievement, Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), or conventional learning model; (2) which students’ have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning creativity; (3) viewed from learning models, which students’ have better mathematich learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low learning cretivity; (4) viewed from their creativity level, which learning model produces better mathematich learning achievement RT, PBL, or conventional model. This study was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The population was the students of XI class, State SMA/MA in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Province in year academic 2013/2014. The samples were taken through stratified cluster random sampling technique. The entire samples were 312 students comprising 101 students for the first experimental group, 108 students for the second experimental group and 103 students for control group. The data were collected through the mathematical achievement tests and the learning creativity questionnaires. The hypothesis testing employed  unbalanced two ways of ANOVA. The results of the study are as follows. (1)  RT produced students’ better mathematics learning achievement than PBL and conventional models; PBL produced the same mathematical achievement as conventional model. (2) The students with high learning creativity had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low learning creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity. (3) Treated with RT, the students with high creativity learning  had better mathematics learning achievement than those with medium and low creativity; the students with medium creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; treated with PBL, the students with high, medium, and low learning creativity had the same achievement; treated with conventional model, students with  high  creativity  had the same achievement as those with medium; the students with high creativity had better achievement than those with low creativity; the students with medium creativity had the same achievement as those with low creativity; (4) Viewed from their high learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional  model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their medium learning creativity, students treated with RT had better mathematics learning achievement than those treated with PBL and conventional model; those treated with PBL had the same achievement as those treated with conventional model. Viewed from their low learning creativity, students treated with RT, PBL and conventional had the same  mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: RT, PBL, learning creativity, the mathematical achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI POKOK HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Nur Ikawati; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10036

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the student Adversity Quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Group Investigation with scientific approach (GI-S), the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair Share with scientific approach (TPS-S), and model of classical learning with scientific approach (K-S). The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all students of Junior High School in Bantul regency on academic year 2014/2015. The samples of  the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaires of AQ. The hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The results of the research are as follows. 1) GI-S gives better mathematics achievements than TPS-S, and both gives better mathematics achievements than K-S. 2) Students with AQ type of climber have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of camper and type of quitter, while students with AQ type of camper have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of quitter. 3) For GI-S and TPS-S, students with AQ type of climber and type of camper have the same mathematics achievements, and students with AQ type of climber and type of camper gives better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of quitter. For K-S, students with AQ type of climber have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of camper and type of quitter, and both have the same mathematics achievements. 4) For students with AQ type of climber and type of quitter, GI-S, TPS-S, and K-S gives the same mathematics achievement. For students with AQ type of camper, GI-S and TPS-S gives the same mathematics achievements, and both gives better mathematics achievements than K-S.Keywords: GI, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ 
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL KESEBANGUNAN BERDASARKAN PROSEDUR NEWMAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL (Penelitian dilaksanakan di Kelas IX SMPN 1 Paguyangan Kabupaten Brebes) An Nur Ami Widodo; Imam Sujadi; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20238

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of this research was to identify the types of students error at 9th grade of SMPN 1 Paguyangan in solving similarity by using Newman’s error analysis procedure from spatial ability. The type of this research is a qualitative research. Subject’s selection procedure was by using purposive sampling. There are 6 subjects in this research. Data collection technique was task-based interviews. The validity was determined by time triangulation. The data analysis was Miles and Huberman model including reduction, data displays, and conclusion. The results of this research showed as follows. The types students with low spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were: reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding errors. The types students with medium spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were: transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The types students with high spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were : transformation error.Keywords: types of error, Newman procedure, spatial ability.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz KH Addin Zuhrotul ‘Aini Agung Putra Wijaya Agus Supriyanto An Nur Ami Widodo Anggrahini Anggrahini Annisa Swastika Arsa’ad Kurniadi Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin Berti Okta Sari Budi Sasomo, Budi Budi Usodo Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro Dian Ratna Ariyani Eka Fitria Ningsih Endang Sri Handayani Faradila Thalib Gatut Iswahyudi Harlinda Fatmawati Heri Cahyono Hirtanto Hirtanto Ika Wulandari Imam Sujadi Intan Novia Sari Isna Nur Lailatul F Isnandar Slamet Kristin Yulianti Marchamah Ulfa Mika Ambarawati Muslikhah Muslikhah Nanndo Yannuansa, Nanndo Nastiti Rahayu Noviana Sukma Dewi Nur Ikawati Pradipta Annurwanda Prihastini Oktasari Putri Puji Rahayu Rahman Haryadi Ratnasari Ratnasari Rini Dewi Safitri Riyadi Riyadi Ronald Manibuy Santi Widyawati Sri Subanti Stefy Erlinda Novalia Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sumanah Sumanah Suprapto Suprapto Suryanto Suryanto Sutrima Sutrima Suyono Suyono Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Triyanto, Triyanto Wahyu Utomo Wawan Wawan Westi Bilda, Westi Widyana Wahyuningtyas YAFITA ARFINA MUTI Yolan Kusumaningtyas Yustinus Murdoko Zaotul Wardi