Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.397
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Delegasi Yure Humano LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum
Muhammad Amin Saleh Al-Habsy
Universitas Mpu Tantular
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Restrictions on Government Officials and Government Agencies in Filing Judicial Review Petitions Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XXII/2024 R. Chresno Wahyu Widodo; Muh. Amin Saleh; Mas Agus Priyambodo; Appe Hutauruk
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/5hp30m76

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of restricting government officials and government agencies from filing petitions for reconsideration (Peninjauan Kembali/PK) in State Administrative Court disputes following Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XXII/2024. Prior to this decision, government officials acting as defendants in administrative disputes were entitled to seek reconsideration against final and binding court judgments. However, this legal remedy was frequently criticized for delaying the execution of judicial decisions and weakening legal protection for citizens. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The study analyzes relevant legislation, Constitutional Court decisions, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature to evaluate the legal rationale and implications of the new restriction. The findings indicate that the Constitutional Court’s decision strengthens the principles of legal certainty, judicial finality, and effective legal protection by preventing the misuse of petitions for reconsideration as a mechanism to postpone the enforcement of final judgments. Nevertheless, the restriction also raises constitutional concerns regarding equality before the law and the government’s right to legal remedies. From the perspectives of John Rawls’ theory of justice, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive legal theory, and Philipus M. Hadjon’s theory of legal protection, the restriction constitutes a proportional legal policy that balances the interests of the state and citizens while reinforcing the State Administrative Court’s role in safeguarding constitutional rights. The study concludes that Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XXII/2024 represents an important development in Indonesian administrative procedural law by enhancing legal certainty and promoting more effective judicial protection for the public
Implementation and Effectiveness of Online Dispute Resolution as an Alternative Mechanism for Resolving E-Commerce Consumer Disputes in Indonesia Siska Septiana; Muh. Amin Saleh; Muhenri Sihotang; Sendi Sanjaya
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/1s8qhs85

Abstract

The rapid growth of e-commerce in Indonesia has facilitated commercial transactions while simultaneously increasing the potential for consumer disputes, including non-conforming goods, delivery delays, personal data breaches, and breaches of contract by business actors. Resolving such disputes through litigation is often considered ineffective due to the significant costs, lengthy procedures, and time required. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as an alternative mechanism for resolving e-commerce consumer disputes in Indonesia and to examine its effectiveness in providing legal protection and legal certainty for the parties involved. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches. Data were collected through library research involving primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and analyzed using a descriptive qualitative method. The findings indicate that ODR offers several advantages, including faster, simpler, more efficient, and lower-cost dispute resolution compared to conventional mechanisms. However, the implementation of ODR in Indonesia has not yet been supported by specific regulations governing its procedures, legal enforceability, and the execution of settlement outcomes. Therefore, comprehensive regulations, standardized ODR mechanisms, and stronger integration with the national dispute resolution system are necessary to ensure effective legal protection, enhance public confidence in electronic commerce, and support the development of a secure, fair, and sustainable digital economy
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR COMPANIES HOLDING CERTIFICATES OF CULTIVATION RIGHTS Hapit Sugandi; Muh. Amin Saleh; Hotman Sinambela; Appe Hutauruk
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal vulnerabilities faced by holders of Land Use Rights (HGU) certificates, particularly those related to the phenomenon of land occupation by third parties and administrative obstacles in renewing rights, have the potential to harm the investment climate. This study aims to analyze legal protection efforts for companies holding HGU certificates based on Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations (UUPA) and examine legal certainty in the process of extending HGU certificates to ensure investment sustainability. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach through an analysis of Case Decision Number 90/Pdt.G/2024/PN Kis. HGU certificates provide preventive legal protection as a strong means of evidence, but in practice, repressive protection still faces obstacles in execution and judges’ interpretation of the social function of land. Legal certainty in HGU extensions is a crucial pillar for the sustainability of corporate investment, where the state is obliged to guarantee the stability of land ownership for rights holders who have fulfilled their constitutional obligations. This study recommends the need for synchronization of land regulations to simplify the bureaucracy of land use rights renewal in order to minimize agrarian disputes in the future.
A NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF SENTENCING FOR HUSBANDS WHO COMMIT ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST THEIR WIVES Supadmi; Muh. Amin Saleh; Hotman Sinambela; Appe Hutauruk
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of substantive criminal law regarding the crime of murder and to evaluate the ratio decidendi of the North Jakarta District Court panel of judges in imposing a criminal sanction on the defendant, Fauzan Fahmi (alias Ome). The primary issues examined include the legal provisions governing murder under Articles 338 through 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and the judges’ legal reasoning in determining the sanction for the defendant. The study employs a normative-juridical legal research method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The findings indicate that the regulation of murder within the Criminal Code is structured hierarchically based on the gradation of culpability (verwijtbaarheid). The application of Article 338 of the Criminal Code in this specific case was legally sound, as the intent to kill arose spontaneously due to provocation by the victim’s words, without a “cooling-off” period for reflection (in kalme beraad). The panel of judges imposed a 14-year prison sentence based on the cumulative fulfillment of all elements of Article 338, established through scientific crime investigation methods, specifically the Visum et Repertum (forensic medical report) and DNA testing. The judges’ sociological and philosophical considerations incorporated the Integrative Theory of Sentencing, balancing the social impact of the crime and the defendant’s status as a recidivist against the educational and corrective functions of sentencing.
A NORMATIVE JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION CONTAINING GAMBLING CONTENT Sularto; Muh. Amin Saleh; Hotman Sinambela; Appe Hutauruk
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Advancements in information technology have led to the emergence of various forms of electronic based crimes, one of which is the dissemination of electronic information containing gambling content. Such acts not only violate criminal law provisions but also negatively impact public order, morality, and the security of the digital space. This study aims to analyze the evidentiary process for online gambling crimes under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, examine judicial considerations in sentencing perpetrators who disseminate gambling related electronic information, and investigate evidentiary obstacles and their resolutions based on a specific case in South Jakarta. The research findings indicate that the evidentiary process relied on admissible evidence as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, supplemented by electronic evidence in accordance with the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. The panel of judges ruled that the defendant was legally and convincingly proven to have committed the crime of intentionally and without authorization distributing or making accessible electronic information containing gambling content. In rendering the verdict, the judges considered juridical aspects such as the fulfillment of criminal elements, evidence, and trial facts as well as non juridical aspects, including the defendant’s attitude, the impact of the act, and the objectives of sentencing. Evidentiary challenges included issues related to the nature of digital evidence, perpetrator identification, and the constantly evolving landscape of information technology. In conclusion, criminal liability for the dissemination of gambling related electronic information in the South Jakarta case was applied in accordance with prevailing legal provisions, specifically the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and Indonesian criminal law.
A NORMATIVE JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL SANCTIONS FOR GAMBLING OFFENSES Maria Prihadiyanti; Muh. Amin Saleh; Hotman Sinambela; Appe Hutauruk
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal sanctions for the crime of gambling under Indonesian positive law specifically Law Number 1 of 2023 and to examine judicial considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on gambling offenders, based on a specific gambling case in North Jakarta. The research employs a normative-juridical legal research method, utilizing both statutory and case-based approaches. The study relies on secondary data, comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection was conducted through literature review, while data analysis was performed qualitatively by elaborating on and correlating criminal law provisions, legal theories, and the judicial considerations found in the court ruling under study. The findings indicate that legal sanctions for gambling offenses in Indonesian positive law are established in Articles 303 and 303-bis of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and updated in Articles 426 and 427 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. These provisions distinguish between parties who offer gambling, provide the opportunity for it, or make a living from it, and those who merely take the opportunity to engage in gambling. In the North Jakarta gambling case, the judge considered juridical aspects namely the fulfillment of the elements of the offense, the presence of valid evidence, and the facts established during the trial. Additionally, the judge took into account non-juridical aspects, such as the defendant’s circumstances, the consequences of the act, and the objectives of sentencing.
Analisis Putusan BPSK DKI Nomor 002 Tahun 2025 Tentang Efektivitas Perlindungan Konsumen Faizal Faizal; Muh. Amin Saleh; Muhenri Sihotang; Appe Hutauruk
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i2.1049

Abstract

Globalisasi perdagangan telah mengubah paradigma transaksi masyarakat dari konvensional menjadi digital. Dinamika ini memunculkan risiko asimetri informasi dan ketimpangan posisi tawar (inequality of bargaining power), di mana konsumen sering berada pada posisi yang rentan akibat penyalahgunaan klausula baku (standard clause) oleh pelaku usaha. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif-analitis dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk perlindungan hukum preventif dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen melalui penegasan hak konsumen (Pasal 4), kewajiban pelaku usaha (Pasal 7), serta larangan mutlak pencantuman klausula baku eksonerasi (Pasal 18). Namun, efektivitas preventif ini dalam praktik masih menghadapi hambatan substansi, struktur, dan budaya hukum. Dalam studi kasus Putusan BPSK No. 002/A/BPSK-DKI/VIII/2025, terjadi kegagalan instrumen preventif di mana developer mencantumkan klausula baku sepihak dalam Surat Pemesanan Unit Kios (SPUK) yang menghanguskan seluruh uang muka konsumen senilai Rp113.800.000,- karena fasilitas Kredit Pemilikan Apartemen (KPA) ditolak bank. Melalui mekanisme represif (arbitrase), Majelis BPSK mengoreksi ketimpangan tersebut dan menyatakan klausula tersebut cacat substansi karena melanggar Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf c Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen serta tidak harmonis dengan Pasal 22H ayat (4) PP Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 yang membatasi potongan maksimal pembatalan KPA sebesar 10%.
Co-Authors adminojshukum Andri Kurnia Anggraeni, Yola Appe Hutauruk Bahori Ahoen Cahyo Priyono Denny Charles Sagala Faizal Faizal Farida Nur Amelia Fitriana Sari Florentinus Eko Yulianto FX Suyud Margono Hapit Sugandi Hotman Sinambela Ifyani Novita Ina Heliany Irene Puteri Alfani Sinaga Irene Puteri Alfani Sofia Sinaga Jopie Tommy Rompas Maria Prihadiyanti Marina R. Purba Mas Agus Priyambodo Muhammad Nur Muhenri Sihotang R. Chresno Wahyu Widodo Rintan Ayu Andini Ronaldo Sahat Tua Sendi Sanjaya Senny Tussytha Sigit Argo Hananto Siska Septiana Siti Wahyuningsih Sularto Supadmi Tarkam Suwirya Tri Heriyanto Yanto Kurnia Yustian Yustian