Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Status Hukum Pagar Laut dan Implikasinya Bagi Hak Masyarakat Pesisir Lentri Larasati Suwignyo; Haris Retno Susmiyati; Wiwik Harjanti
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6798

Abstract

The phenomenon of sea fences in coastal waters raises legal issues because there are currently no specific regulations governing their status within the Indonesian legal system, even though the utilization of marine space is already regulated by various laws and regulations. This study aims to analyze the legal framework regarding the existence of sea fences within the context of marine spatial planning and coastal zone management in Indonesia, as well as their implications for the rights of coastal communities. The study employs a normative legal research method utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through a descriptive-qualitative method. The findings indicate that sea fences constitute a form of marine space utilization that must comply with regulations concerning marine spatial planning, coastal zone management, and marine space utilization mechanisms. Although not specifically regulated, the construction of sea fences cannot be undertaken arbitrarily; it must align with spatial plans and applicable regulations. The presence of sea fences—which restrict public access to marine space—conflicts with the principle of state control as stipulated in Article 33, Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and potentially infringes upon the rights of coastal communities to utilize marine space.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Perusahaan Tambang Bartubara Atas Kerusakan Rumah Warga : Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Argosari Kecamatan Samboja Barat Winda Febriani; Haris Retno Susmiyati; Wiwik Harjanti
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3308

Abstract

Coal mining activities in Argosari Village have generated both economic benefits and negative impacts on the surrounding community, including damage to residents’ houses due to vibrations, blasting activities, and land subsidence. These conditions raise legal issues regarding the mining company’s civil liability, particularly in relation to land lease agreements between the company and residents. This study aims to analyze the company’s civil liability and examine the legal implications of land lease agreements without written evidence from the perspective of Indonesian civil law. This research uses a socio-legal approach that examines not only legal norms but also the implementation of law in society. The findings indicate that affected communities consist of residents with land lease agreements and residents without contractual relationships with the company. The absence of written evidence prevents the application of liability based on breach of contract, making tort liability the appropriate legal mechanism. The company’s forms of compensation include financial compensation, house repairs, construction of new houses, and land restoration in areas affected by landslides. This study highlights the importance of legal certainty and community protection in mining activities.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Berdasarkan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Kasus Penjualan Lahan tanpa Hak Waode Noor Hasanah; Haris Retno Susmiyati; Wiwik Harjanti
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3309

Abstract

The Borneo Orangutan Survival (BOS) Samboja Lestari Foundation is the rightful owner of the conservation area that was the subject of an unauthorized land sale, as stated in Criminal Case No. 71/Pid.B/2025/PN Trg. These actions raise legal issues because they have the potential to harm the party holding rights to the land and undermine the interests of environmental and wildlife conservation. Although the case has been prosecuted criminally, the civil aspects related to unlawful acts and forms of compensation for the aggrieved party still require further examination. This study employs a doctrinal (normative) legal method using a legislative and case-law approach. The legal materials consist of primary sources—such as laws and court decisions—and secondary sources—such as books, journals, and previous research. These materials are analyzed qualitatively using a prescriptive method to address the legal issues under investigation. The research findings indicate that the sale of land within the BOS Samboja Lestari Foundation’s conservation area constitutes a tort under Article 1365 of the Civil Code, encompassing an unlawful act, fault, damage, and a causal relationship, thereby giving rise to civil liability separate from criminal sanctions as stated in Judgment No. 71/Pid.B/2025/PN Trg. The recommended form of redress is restitution through the restoration of the land to its original condition (restitutio in integrum) to restore the ecological function of the area and compensate the BOS Samboja Lestari Foundation for its losses.