Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : BIOEDUSCIENCE

Perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains Biologi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Berdasarkan Tingkat Akreditas Sekolah Luthpi Safahi; Budhi Akbar; Anah Selvianah; Yuni Astuti; Devi Anugrah
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 3 No 2 (2019): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.327 KB) | DOI: 10.29405/j.bes/32106-1113651

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan keterampilan proses sains (KPS) Biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi A dengan siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi B. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kausal kompratif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMA Swasta di Jakarta Barat Wilayah 1 Kecamatan Cengkareng tahun ajaran 2015/2016 yang berjumlah ±1.680 siswa. Pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan teknik Cluster Random Sampling dan terpilih empat sekolah SMA Swasta dua Sekolah Akreditasi A (40 orang) dan dua Sekolah Akreditasi B (40 orang). Penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Januari – Juni 2016. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes objektif KPS yang terdiri dari 34 soal. Data penelitian dianalisis menggunakan Uji-t. Hasilnya menunjukkan thit (4,60) > ttabel (0,975) (1,99), Hipotesis ditolak, sehingga ada perbedaan keterampilan proses sains Biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi A dengan siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi B.
Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis Siswa melalui Strategi Pemberian Feedback Pembelajaran Sistem Ekskresi: - Yuni Astuti; Siti Aulia Febrianti; Budhi Akbar; Luthpi Safahi
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 5 No 3 (2021): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.719 KB) | DOI: 10.22236/j.bes/537767

Abstract

Background: The ability to think analytically is one part of higher-order thinking skills, which should be owned by students according to the reference in the curriculum. Giving feedback is one of the efforts to support students' analytical thinking skills. Methods: The research used is Quasi-Experimental, with a Posttest-Only Control Design. The sampling technique used was Cluster Random Sampling. The research instrument was used through a test in the form of a description of 6 questions integrated into three indicators of analytical thinking ability (Differentiating, Attributing and Organizing). Results: showed that the average value of posttest analytical thinking ability in the experimental class was 63.67, which was greater than the control class, which was 56.63. Hypothesis testing through t-test at the 5% significance level obtained the value of tcount = 2.13 while ttable = 2.00, it is mean that tcount > ttable then H0 is rejected. Conclusions: The conclusion that can be formulated is that giving feedback has a significant effect on students' analytical thinking skills on the excretory system material, with the highest achievement indicator of analytical thinking ability achieved by indicators attributing.
Perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains Biologi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Berdasarkan Tingkat Akreditas Sekolah Luthpi Safahi; Budhi Akbar; Anah Selvianah; Yuni Astuti; Devi Anugrah
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 3 No 2 (2019): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29405/j.bes/32106-1113651

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan keterampilan proses sains (KPS) Biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi A dengan siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi B. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kausal kompratif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMA Swasta di Jakarta Barat Wilayah 1 Kecamatan Cengkareng tahun ajaran 2015/2016 yang berjumlah ±1.680 siswa. Pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan teknik Cluster Random Sampling dan terpilih empat sekolah SMA Swasta dua Sekolah Akreditasi A (40 orang) dan dua Sekolah Akreditasi B (40 orang). Penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Januari – Juni 2016. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes objektif KPS yang terdiri dari 34 soal. Data penelitian dianalisis menggunakan Uji-t. Hasilnya menunjukkan thit (4,60) > ttabel (0,975) (1,99), Hipotesis ditolak, sehingga ada perbedaan keterampilan proses sains Biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi A dengan siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi B.
Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis Siswa melalui Strategi Pemberian Feedback Pembelajaran Sistem Ekskresi: - Yuni Astuti; Siti Aulia Febrianti; Budhi Akbar; Luthpi Safahi
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 5 No 3 (2021): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/j.bes/537767

Abstract

Background: The ability to think analytically is one part of higher-order thinking skills, which should be owned by students according to the reference in the curriculum. Giving feedback is one of the efforts to support students' analytical thinking skills. Methods: The research used is Quasi-Experimental, with a Posttest-Only Control Design. The sampling technique used was Cluster Random Sampling. The research instrument was used through a test in the form of a description of 6 questions integrated into three indicators of analytical thinking ability (Differentiating, Attributing and Organizing). Results: showed that the average value of posttest analytical thinking ability in the experimental class was 63.67, which was greater than the control class, which was 56.63. Hypothesis testing through t-test at the 5% significance level obtained the value of tcount = 2.13 while ttable = 2.00, it is mean that tcount > ttable then H0 is rejected. Conclusions: The conclusion that can be formulated is that giving feedback has a significant effect on students' analytical thinking skills on the excretory system material, with the highest achievement indicator of analytical thinking ability achieved by indicators attributing.
Perbedaan Keterampilan Proses Sains Biologi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Berdasarkan Tingkat Akreditas Sekolah Luthpi Safahi; Budhi Akbar; Anah Selvianah; Yuni Astuti; Devi Anugrah
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 3 No 2 (2019): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29405/j.bes/32106-1113651

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan keterampilan proses sains (KPS) Biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi A dengan siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi B. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kausal kompratif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMA Swasta di Jakarta Barat Wilayah 1 Kecamatan Cengkareng tahun ajaran 2015/2016 yang berjumlah ±1.680 siswa. Pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan teknik Cluster Random Sampling dan terpilih empat sekolah SMA Swasta dua Sekolah Akreditasi A (40 orang) dan dua Sekolah Akreditasi B (40 orang). Penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Januari – Juni 2016. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes objektif KPS yang terdiri dari 34 soal. Data penelitian dianalisis menggunakan Uji-t. Hasilnya menunjukkan thit (4,60) > ttabel (0,975) (1,99), Hipotesis ditolak, sehingga ada perbedaan keterampilan proses sains Biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi A dengan siswa sekolah menengah atas akreditasi B.
Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis Siswa melalui Strategi Pemberian Feedback Pembelajaran Sistem Ekskresi: - Yuni Astuti; Siti Aulia Febrianti; Budhi Akbar; Luthpi Safahi
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 5 No 3 (2021): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/j.bes/537767

Abstract

Background: The ability to think analytically is one part of higher-order thinking skills, which should be owned by students according to the reference in the curriculum. Giving feedback is one of the efforts to support students' analytical thinking skills. Methods: The research used is Quasi-Experimental, with a Posttest-Only Control Design. The sampling technique used was Cluster Random Sampling. The research instrument was used through a test in the form of a description of 6 questions integrated into three indicators of analytical thinking ability (Differentiating, Attributing and Organizing). Results: showed that the average value of posttest analytical thinking ability in the experimental class was 63.67, which was greater than the control class, which was 56.63. Hypothesis testing through t-test at the 5% significance level obtained the value of tcount = 2.13 while ttable = 2.00, it is mean that tcount > ttable then H0 is rejected. Conclusions: The conclusion that can be formulated is that giving feedback has a significant effect on students' analytical thinking skills on the excretory system material, with the highest achievement indicator of analytical thinking ability achieved by indicators attributing.